Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #37  
Old 26th June 2010, 10:29
Juha's Avatar
Juha Juha is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,455
Juha is on a distinguished road
Re: RAF and dive-bombing.

Hello Tony
if not fighter-bombers, light and medium bombers knocked out the numerous Seine bridges, what did that? Freeman in his Over the Beaches p. 65 claimed that “On the eve of invasion, 74 bridges leading into the landing area were destroyed or made impassable…” I’m not sure what are the real figures but one can see from German unit histories that the interdiction campaign in Normandy was a success. IMHO LW with its Stukas didn’t do it better on Crete, it had less resources but Commonwealth troops had much less AA protection than Heer in Normandy. And if you believe that Seine bridges were not defended, why Allied AFs suffered losses over them? Fighter bombers did also great work against German radar stations before D-Day, even if ALSO those were well defended. And as you know, LW Ju-87s found radar stations very difficult to knock out during the BoB, even if they had some success.

And I’m sure that there were numerous company commanders in Heer that prefer 10,5cm field howitzer over Ju-87, because it “was accurate, reliable and always available”. After all dive-bomber was even more weather restricted than fighter-bomber because it needed much higher minimum cloud base height than the latter.

I agree that dive-bomber was an accurate weaponsystem, but IMHO not a wonder-weapon that would have solved all those difficult problems which hindered air support with WWII technology. Warfare was team work and in the end it was still the “bloody infantry” which had to occupy the contested territory.

On armour, Il-2 was interesting a/c, its armour made it almost totally invulnerable to rifle-calibre fire, even if Finns used their rifle-calibre AAmgs to kill the rear-gunners of departing Il-2s, so infantry was defenceless against it. 20mm AAA was also rather helpless at the beginning but by increasing the proportion of AP-shells that problem was mostly overcome, the price was less destructiveness when firing at other a/c types. The price of armour protection was of course its weight and so bomb-load of Il-2 was small. I know that there was a set of appliqué armour for Typhoon, but I have no idea how widely it was used.

Juha

Last edited by Juha; 26th June 2010 at 10:45. Reason: added the armour part
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Friendly fire WWII Brian Allied and Soviet Air Forces 805 19th August 2026 07:23
107 Sqn RAF david.owens7@virgin.net Allied and Soviet Air Forces 13 23rd October 2019 00:40
9 April 1945: Me 262 claimed damaged by 617 RAF Squadron Lancaster gunner Roger Gaemperle Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 0 3rd August 2009 12:49
Placing the Bell P39 Aircobra. tcolvin Allied and Soviet Air Forces 158 22nd August 2007 12:12
Thunderbolts and Mustangs versus the Jagdwaffe (split topic) Ruy Horta Allied and Soviet Air Forces 98 9th August 2007 16:22


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:43.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2026, 12oclockhigh.net