Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th August 2010, 21:38
robert robert is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 1,923
robert is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: 15.8.40 Marlsham-Heath Erpr.Gr.210 vs 1 & 17 Sqdn question

Hi,

both squadrons were too late. They fought most likely with ZG26 and JG51.

Robert
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 8th August 2010, 22:44
John Vasco's Avatar
John Vasco John Vasco is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norwich, originally Liverpool
Posts: 1,229
John Vasco will become famous soon enough
Re: 15.8.40 Marlsham-Heath Erpr.Gr.210 vs 1 & 17 Sqdn question

Quote:
Originally Posted by robert View Post
Hi,

both squadrons were too late. They fought most likely with ZG26 and JG51.

Robert
Both Squadrons were too late to prevent the bombing of Martlesham Heath, but were not too late to intercept Erprobungsgruppe 210 AFTER the raid. Can you tell me your source for the likely involvement of ZG 26 and JG 51?
__________________
Wir greifen schon an!

Splinter Live at The Cavern, November 2006: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxOCksQUKbI

Danke schön, Dank schön ich bin ganz comfortable!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 8th August 2010, 23:12
robert robert is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 1,923
robert is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: 15.8.40 Marlsham-Heath Erpr.Gr.210 vs 1 & 17 Sqdn question

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Vasco View Post
Both Squadrons were too late to prevent the bombing of Martlesham Heath, but were not too late to intercept Erprobungsgruppe 210 AFTER the raid. Can you tell me your source for the likely involvement of ZG 26 and JG 51?
And can you tell me what losses were suffered by Erp.Gr.210 in this likely engagement?
Look at claims reported e.g. by III./ZG26, I,II./JG51. They were detailed to fly fighter sweeps in attack areas of KG2, KG3 and Erp.Gr.210 and III./ZG26 was most likely flying direct escort for one of those units.

Regards

Robert
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 9th August 2010, 19:10
John Vasco's Avatar
John Vasco John Vasco is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norwich, originally Liverpool
Posts: 1,229
John Vasco will become famous soon enough
Re: 15.8.40 Marlsham-Heath Erpr.Gr.210 vs 1 & 17 Sqdn question

Quote:
Originally Posted by robert View Post
And can you tell me what losses were suffered by Erp.Gr.210 in this likely engagement?
Look at claims reported e.g. by III./ZG26, I,II./JG51. They were detailed to fly fighter sweeps in attack areas of KG2, KG3 and Erp.Gr.210 and III./ZG26 was most likely flying direct escort for one of those units.

Regards

Robert
One Bf 110 damaged (Lt. Erich Beudel). All attacking aircraft of Erpr. Gr. 210 returned to Calais-Marck.

Sorry, Robert, 'most likely' cuts no ice with me at all. Do you have a source for direct escort to Erpr. Gr. 210 for the Martlesham Heath raid? Fighter sweeps in attack areas could mean hundreds of square miles quite easily, and then multiplied by the third dimensions of many thousands of feet...

I ask all of this, not to demolish any point you make, but rather to know of the exact source, because those Erpr. Gr. 210 crew that I interviewed, all said that that raid was conducted without escort, and the 3. Staffel Bf 109s waded into the Hurricanes that managed to get at the formation following the attack (interview with Hintze, in particular).
__________________
Wir greifen schon an!

Splinter Live at The Cavern, November 2006: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxOCksQUKbI

Danke schön, Dank schön ich bin ganz comfortable!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 9th August 2010, 19:25
robert robert is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 1,923
robert is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: 15.8.40 Marlsham-Heath Erpr.Gr.210 vs 1 & 17 Sqdn question

Hi,

this is my opinion. I know that III./ZG26 and II./ZG26 were airborne at this time and in rule twin-engined fighters were deployed rather on direct escort, whilst single-engined were detailed to fly mostly fighter sweeps (around this time). Of course I have no hard evidence that they were supporting Epr.Gr.210 - I think that the latter acted individually.
III./ZG26 became engaged with fighters - it could be also that one of its Bf110s was claimed by 1 Sqn.
And I don`t not know that Bf110 of Beudel was damaged by flak or fighter or it was just technical failure.

Warm Regards

Robert
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10th August 2010, 12:19
Rob Romero Rob Romero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 416
Rob Romero is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: 15.8.40 Marlsham-Heath Erpr.Gr.210 vs 1 & 17 Sqdn question

Which losses fit well with claims by Priller and Haase?

TIA

Rob Romero
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Friendly fire WWII Brian Allied and Soviet Air Forces 803 8th July 2023 16:47
Operation Jubilee aircrew list Steve49 Allied and Soviet Air Forces 39 12th December 2010 23:00
A question for John Vasco Erpr.Gr.210 steve sheridan Books and Magazines 4 17th February 2005 01:52


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:59.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net