![]() |
|
|||||||
| Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 15.8.40 Marlsham-Heath Erpr.Gr.210 vs 1 & 17 Sqdn question
Hi,
both squadrons were too late. They fought most likely with ZG26 and JG51. Robert |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 15.8.40 Marlsham-Heath Erpr.Gr.210 vs 1 & 17 Sqdn question
Both Squadrons were too late to prevent the bombing of Martlesham Heath, but were not too late to intercept Erprobungsgruppe 210 AFTER the raid. Can you tell me your source for the likely involvement of ZG 26 and JG 51?
__________________
Wir greifen schon an! Splinter Live at The Cavern, November 2006: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxOCksQUKbI Danke schön, Dank schön ich bin ganz comfortable! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 15.8.40 Marlsham-Heath Erpr.Gr.210 vs 1 & 17 Sqdn question
Quote:
Look at claims reported e.g. by III./ZG26, I,II./JG51. They were detailed to fly fighter sweeps in attack areas of KG2, KG3 and Erp.Gr.210 and III./ZG26 was most likely flying direct escort for one of those units. Regards Robert |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 15.8.40 Marlsham-Heath Erpr.Gr.210 vs 1 & 17 Sqdn question
Quote:
Sorry, Robert, 'most likely' cuts no ice with me at all. Do you have a source for direct escort to Erpr. Gr. 210 for the Martlesham Heath raid? Fighter sweeps in attack areas could mean hundreds of square miles quite easily, and then multiplied by the third dimensions of many thousands of feet... I ask all of this, not to demolish any point you make, but rather to know of the exact source, because those Erpr. Gr. 210 crew that I interviewed, all said that that raid was conducted without escort, and the 3. Staffel Bf 109s waded into the Hurricanes that managed to get at the formation following the attack (interview with Hintze, in particular).
__________________
Wir greifen schon an! Splinter Live at The Cavern, November 2006: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxOCksQUKbI Danke schön, Dank schön ich bin ganz comfortable! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 15.8.40 Marlsham-Heath Erpr.Gr.210 vs 1 & 17 Sqdn question
Hi,
this is my opinion. I know that III./ZG26 and II./ZG26 were airborne at this time and in rule twin-engined fighters were deployed rather on direct escort, whilst single-engined were detailed to fly mostly fighter sweeps (around this time). Of course I have no hard evidence that they were supporting Epr.Gr.210 - I think that the latter acted individually. III./ZG26 became engaged with fighters - it could be also that one of its Bf110s was claimed by 1 Sqn. And I don`t not know that Bf110 of Beudel was damaged by flak or fighter or it was just technical failure. Warm Regards Robert |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 15.8.40 Marlsham-Heath Erpr.Gr.210 vs 1 & 17 Sqdn question
Which losses fit well with claims by Priller and Haase?
TIA Rob Romero |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Friendly fire WWII | Brian | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 803 | 8th July 2023 16:47 |
| Operation Jubilee aircrew list | Steve49 | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 39 | 12th December 2010 23:00 |
| A question for John Vasco Erpr.Gr.210 | steve sheridan | Books and Magazines | 4 | 17th February 2005 01:52 |