![]() |
|
|||||||
| Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Interpretation of Luftwaffe Loss Statistics
...could it be contct to enemy in the air?! they could have been lost by aa-fire, so from the ground, haven´t had contact with an enemy in the air.
all the best jim |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Interpretation of Luftwaffe Loss Statistics
No idea how an aircraft can be lost through enemy action without enemy contact, but I wonder if that can be compared to the statistics showing aircraft destroyed or damaged by enemy aircraft, and dividing them between those observed by enemy and not.
For example: _ an aircraft shot down during a battle will be observed by the enemy _ an aircraft taking one bullet in the engine, that seized 15 minutes and 100 km later and ending in a ditching/failed force-landed in/near friendly land will be an aircraft destroyed by enemy aircraft without being observed by the enemy |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Interpretation of Luftwaffe Loss Statistics
Rod, Jim & Laurent
Me as a German native would explain it as follow: An operational fighting-unit(Jäger, Bomber, Schlachtflieger) is flying an operational mission. This is called Feindflug, Feindeinsatz. While flying this mission, they have contact with enemy a/c and losses due to this enemy a/c, the losses are described as "mit Feindberührung". All losses like mechanical failures without an appearance of the enemy during a "Feindflug" are described as "ohne Feindberührung" A good question is, if anti-aircraft fire, which caused a loss during a Feindflug, would have been described as "mit Feindberührung", too. On my opinion, I would rather say, that "mit Feindberührung" was a loss to any enemy action while on a Feindflug. Best regards ! Horst Weber |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Interpretation of Luftwaffe Loss Statistics
Thanks, Horst, for the detailed explanation.
What was the difference between a Feindflug and a Frontflug?
__________________
Dénes |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Interpretation of Luftwaffe Loss Statistics
In some sets of OKL statistics losses due to enemy action are classified as either with enemy contact (Feindberührung) or without enemy contact (ohne Feindberührung).
Does it say Feindberührung in full? I only ask because the monthly stats talk about losses mit or ohne Feindeinwirkung. So enemy action rather than enemy contact. That means you could lose a plane to enemy action without leaving the ground (e.g. in an air raid, or even from artillery fire). I'd have thought that a loss to enemy action on a non-operational flight would still show up in the Qen. Qu. loss returns as "(H)" rather than "(F)" = Feindflug, whereas in the monthly loss/arrival figures it would show as a loss mit Feindeinwirkung. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Luftwaffe loss 25 August 1941? | bill norman | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 2 | 16th March 2010 09:08 |
| Luftwaffe loss over the North Sea, 24th June 1941 | Hans Nauta | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 2 | 6th December 2009 09:43 |
| A Luftwaffe Loss?? | Nostalgair | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 2 | 18th January 2008 23:12 |
| Luftwaffe GQM loss list experiences | Boris Ciglic | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 18 | 7th October 2005 17:17 |
| Luftwaffe loss 15.08.1942 | Melvin Brownless | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 4 | 1st July 2005 20:17 |