Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12th February 2006, 03:18
marsyao marsyao is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 162
marsyao
Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel and sinking of Marat

Klaus, Soviet battleship Marat was already heavily damaged in a sorties on Sep 16, hit by a 500-kg bomber dropped by the commander of III/StG 2 Hauptmann Ernst-Sigfried Steen, because lack of material and time to repair the damage, it was decided Marat would be used as a floating battery inside Kronstadt, many of her sailor was re-deployed as infantry. Then in the Luftwaffe air raid on Sep 23, Marat was hit by 3 1000-Kg bomb, one was dropped by Oberleutnant Hans-Ulrich Rudel of III/Stg 2, the other was dropped by Oberleutnant Lothar Lau, the StG 2 technical officer, it was not certain who dropped the third bomb, and it looked like it was the bomber dropped by Oberleutnant Lau caused the most serious damage on the battleship's bow, however the battleship did not sink, the reason was simple, the water was too shallow to allow such a large warship to sink, only one of the turret of guns could resume fire after the damage, which resume fire support almost immediately, after repair, eventually all of Marat's guns were put back to action,and the warship itself could slowly moving in the navy base, however Marat was never sailed to ocean in the war time.
Rudel's destory and cruiser claimed could not be confirmed by Soviet loss records.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12th February 2006, 12:25
Juha's Avatar
Juha Juha is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,448
Juha is on a distinguished road
Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel and sinking of Marat

Hello marsyao
are you sure that also the bow or "A" turret in RN parlance, was reactivated? My understanding has been that the A-turret was smashed in the explosition and not repaired, otherwise I agree with your description, meaning that the mid-ship turrets (B and C) were later repaired, or was it that only B turret needed more extensive repairs, and the stern or D turret was able to resume fire almost immediately after the hits.
If the bow turret was repaired, have you info when it was able to fire again?

Regards
Juha
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12th February 2006, 19:21
marsyao marsyao is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 162
marsyao
Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel and sinking of Marat

oops, Juha, you are correct,"A" turret did not come back to service
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 6th May 2020, 21:48
Andrey Kuznetsov Andrey Kuznetsov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 902
Andrey Kuznetsov will become famous soon enough
Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel and sinking of Marat

Quote:
Originally Posted by marsyao View Post
Then in the Luftwaffe air raid on Sep 23, Marat was hit by 3 1000-Kg bomb, one was dropped by Oberleutnant Hans-Ulrich Rudel of III/Stg 2, the other was dropped by Oberleutnant Lothar Lau, the StG 2 technical officer, it was not certain who dropped the third bomb, and it looked like it was the bomber dropped by Oberleutnant Lau caused the most serious damage on the battleship's bow
Maybe my reaction not-so-quick (14 years have passed), but what is the evidence that namely Lothar Lau most likely inflicted the fatal damage to "Marat"?

Best regards,
Andrey
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net