Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #23  
Old 27th July 2007, 18:12
tcolvin tcolvin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Topsham, England
Posts: 422
tcolvin is on a distinguished road
Re: Placing the Fairey Battle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham Boak View Post
Does your claim that no CAS was provided on June 6th have any actual backing in fact? Of all the sorties flown, not a single one was CAS? Or is it linked to your attitude that whatever was provided was wrong, inadequate, and therefore dismissable? Of course, not all aerial support given to the Armies was CAS, or are you suggesting that if it isn't in sight of a soldier, it is not happening, and of no value if it is?
There was no CAS available to help the Suffolks take the Hillman concrete strongpoint that held up 3 Div throughout D-Day. Therefore Caen was not occupied and no airfield like Carpiquet became available for 2TAF.
There were lots of 2TAF RP Typhoons around on D-Day, but no forward air controller. There was a naval liaison officer with 3 Div but he was killed, so no 11-inch guns could be used. There was no Flak to worry Vengeances had they been released from target-towing duties in Devon. RP Typhoons were unavailable but were not the answer. Sherman tanks were available but likewise not the answer. Maybe bombs delivered by the Vengeances were also no answer, but they were the best bet after ships' guns.
The infantry should have had dive-bombers under command, as the Royal Artillery had Austers under command flown by gunners but supplied and serviced by the RAF. Gunner forward observation officers lived with the infantry battalions who felt they had their 'own' troop of three 25-pdrs. The FOO had only to call in an emergency and the troop would always drop what it was doing and come to the help of 'its' infantry battalion. If the threat was severe, the FOO could call on a battery, or a regiment, or higher. The FOO's decision was never questioned - unlike the case in the US Army which never trusted their FOO's with that discretion.
The Army tried to develop this kind of unit relationship between squadrons and brigades, and between sections and battalions. But the RAF always categorically refused. All they would allow was the permament allocation of a Group to an Army. So Typhoon pilots never met the infantry they supported, and never got their feedback.
The wrong aircraft with the wrong weapon in the wrong organisation gave the wrong result.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
12 SQUADRON FAIREY BATTLE L4949 malcolmjameswilson Allied and Soviet Air Forces 4 4th May 2007 18:15
Downed Fairey Battle D-RH Griffon Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 8 23rd July 2006 10:12
Battle Of Britain Books Jim Oxley Books and Magazines 3 13th March 2006 06:56
Claims identites Adam Allied and Soviet Air Forces 3 27th May 2005 01:05
Non-Operational Unit victories in the Battle of Britain Larry Allied and Soviet Air Forces 2 7th January 2005 00:05


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:28.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net