![]() |
|
Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
311 Czech Sqn Wellington: Mk.I or Mk.III?
Hi,
I am looking to make a specific Czech Squadron Wellington "C o KX" from 311 Sqn based in England from Tally Ho's decal sheet #8039: http://www.hannants.co.uk/search/?FULL=TY48039 It is the top aircraft in the link. The problem is the description says it is a MkIc, but it appears to have the fuselage sides with far fewer windows which, i thought, was more consistent with a MkIII. Does anyone know for sure which aircraft this was, and whether or not it had any particular features? Any help much appreciated. Kind egards, Nicholas |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 311 Czech Sqn Wellington: Mk.I or Mk.III?
The side windows are not specific to type. The Mk.III will have had the four-gun tail turret and Hercules engines.
I believe - but it needs checking - that the Rxxxx serial block are Mk.1s. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 311 Czech Sqn Wellington: Mk.I or Mk.III?
Quote:
many thanks for this - i suppose that makes sense. now one more question: are the Hercules engines visibly different? I already have the Trumpeter Mk.III kit (few windows), but obviously this may have the wrong engines. A kit bash is going to be expensive! Kind regards, nick |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 311 Czech Sqn Wellington: Mk.I or Mk.III?
The Pegasus is a single-row engine, the Hercules a double row. The engine cowlings do look different, if you look at them, though perhaps not as much as might be expected.
The lack of a two-gun rear turret might be a problem for you. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 311 Czech Sqn Wellington: Mk.I or Mk.III?
Hi Nicholas!
311st Squadron RAF was not "Czech" squadron! It was "CZECHOSLOVAK" squadron! Thanks! Milan |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: 311 Czech Sqn Wellington: Mk.I or Mk.III?
Nicholas,
The 311 Sqn was not using the Mark III version. It had IA, IC and X Wellingtons in possession during 1940-43 period. Regards, Michal |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 311 Czech Sqn Wellington: Mk.I or Mk.III?
Quote:
Slip of the tongue - apologies. No real excuse, especially as I seem to spend half my time correcting people when they ask my fiancee about "Czechoslovakia", and I tell them that they are now 2 countries, not one! (She is from Prague). Kind regards, Nick |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 311 Czech Sqn Wellington: Mk.I or Mk.III?
Hi Milan,
you are 100% right - the official name is "No. 311 (Czechoslovak) Bomber Squadron but I would like to note that in quite a lot of official documents (forms, reports, orders, etc.) written during the war the squadron is noted as "CZECH" only. I personally suppose it was only endeavour of clerks to shorten the text and nothing against the Slovaks;-) Pavel
__________________
http://cz-raf.webnode.cz |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 311 Czech Sqn Wellington: Mk.I or Mk.III?
Nick,
the Wellington R1598 KX-C had the side windows and it was Mk. IC (there are some photos proving this) serving with No. 311 Sq between March 41 and February 42 flying 51 sorties while being destroyed on overshoot, Cranwell, 23.1.43 with No. 3 OTU. Pavel
__________________
http://cz-raf.webnode.cz |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 311 Czech Sqn Wellington: Mk.I or Mk.III?
Perhaps they left off the Slovak part of the name in RAF wartime records, as the Slovak government was on the Axis side for much of the war?
__________________
Larry Hayward |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAF and RAAF ORBs available on the Web | Laurent Rizzotti | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 43 | 23rd October 2015 14:46 |
German claims and Allied losses May 1940 | Laurent Rizzotti | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 2 | 19th May 2010 11:13 |
Which Allied unit made the attack? | Mikael Olrog | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 8 | 31st January 2010 23:20 |
Spitfire losses January 22nd, 1943 | Jochen Prien | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 5 | 14th September 2006 01:35 |
Wellington T2473 9 Sqn | Willi Vrielink | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 3 | 9th February 2005 01:48 |