![]() |
|
|||||||
| Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: About WW2 fighter aircraft firing power
The advantages of high muzzle velocity is not limited to the flat flight path of the projectile and sudden movements of the target (Janacek's point); because the time to reach target is shorter, also the needed lead is shorter and therefore the aiming error will be smaller as well.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: About WW2 fighter aircraft firing power
Quote:
However, with automatic guns, such as aircraft cannons, a round fired earlier, ie. in case of higher cyclic rate during a given time frame will reach the target earlier, than in a case of a higher velocity round fired at a slower cyclic rate. For practical applications, careful aiming and application of proper lead is less attractive than just let the target 'walked into' a sufficiently dense line of firepower applied - ie. point and shoot. Its a fail-proof method. There is a reason for using shotguns for hunting small game and birds with a high number of slow pellets instead of .223 bolt action rifles with 1200-1300 m/sec.
__________________
Kurfürst! - The Messerschmitt Bf 109 Performance Resource Site http://www.kurfurst.org/ |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: About WW2 fighter aircraft firing power
However, with automatic guns, such as aircraft cannons, a round fired earlier, ie. in case of higher cyclic rate during a given time frame will reach the target earlier, than in a case of a higher velocity round fired at a slower cyclic rate. For practical applications, careful aiming and application of proper lead is less attractive than just let the target 'walked into' a sufficiently dense line of firepower applied - ie. point and shoot. Its a fail-proof method. No, it is not! actively "Dragging" the bullet stream accross the target is much better than waiting for the target to fly threw. The neccessary ingreadient is that the shorter the ToF, the more likely you are to be able to score hits!
There is a reason for using shotguns for hunting small game and birds with a high number of slow pellets instead of .223 bolt action rifles with 1200-1300 m/sec. This argument is faseeshious on it's face! There are numerious reasons why it is not true! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Friendly fire WWII | Brian | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 803 | 8th July 2023 16:47 |
| Book on French AF 1939-40? | The_Catman | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 68 | 10th August 2008 16:58 |
| Airpower summary | Pilot | Post-WW2 Military and Naval Aviation | 0 | 23rd February 2007 16:11 |
| Aircraft performance curves | Christer Bergström | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 17 | 19th November 2005 22:49 |
| Fighter pilots' guts | Hawk-Eye | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 44 | 8th April 2005 15:25 |