|
Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
Quote:
As to P-47s shooting down experten like Rall - true. Rall ventured into the range of P-47s on May 12 and was shot down after he cornered Hub Zemke and nearly shot him down - around Frankfurt - just inside P-47 range. Note all the experten (and experienced fighter pilots) shot down from Frankfurt to Posnan and Brux and Schweinfurt by Mustangs as well as eliminating the Me 110 and Me 410 from truly effective sorties against bombers. The initial value of the Mustang is that it killed a LOT of LW experienced fighter pilots based in LF Reich which were pulled in from Ost and Sud fronts as reinforcement against 8th AF campaing against strategic targets. Note also that most of the air to air Jug kills in the west during 1943 were primarily Luftflotte 3 with JG2 and JG26 as well as western Germany based units of Mitte and then Reich. They weren't touching German pilots based in Central, Eastern and Southern Germany and particularly after the LW adopted the tactics of waiting to hit the bombers after they were out of P-47 escort range. In fact, the P-51B IMO completely neutralized the LW ability to a.) effectively resist 8th AF incursions anywhere in Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia and b.) contest air superiority over Normandy, and c.) regroup/re-train and re-deply more experienced fighter pilots. The numbers for ETO/USAAF ONLY 1942-May, 1945 - 8th and 9th AF Spitfire 15.0 P38 452.0 P-47 2,658.4 P-51 4,179.2 P-61 128.0 The 'crossover' point for the transisition from P-47 to P-51 as dominant ETO fighter occurred from Big Week to Big B, February 20, 1944 through March 8, 1944. Between Feb 20 and Feb 29 the Jug (all 8th and 9th AF P-47s combined) outscored the Mustang 140 to 64.5. From March 1 through March 8 the Mustangs (4 FG's, one with two days experience (355th), two with one and three weeks experience (357/4th) and one with three months (354FG) - outscored all 11 P-47 Groups (56, 78, 352, 353, 355(six days), 356, 358, 359, 361, 362, 365) - 108 to 86. By the end of March the tally for P-51s during March was 254 to 176 for the Jugs. April was 322 to 85 - Mustang over P-47. This does not include aircraft destroyed on the Ground by the P-51 in that period. From January through May the P-51 destroyed. count was 529 to 164.5 for the Jug. All in - 8th and 9th AF combined Jan 1 through May 31 leading up to control of the air over Normandy beaches P-47 Destroyed 764.5 air and 164.5 ground. The P-51 destroyed 1142.3 air and 529 ground. As to the thread - I do believe Daylight Strategic bombing was on a very short leash until the decision was made that the number one objective for the 8th and 9th AF was to eliminate LW resistance over the Normandy campaign - and even then the initiation of re-targeting deep strategic targets didn't occur until two P-38 and one P-51 Group was operational in January 1944.
__________________
" The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
Iran will probably air-burst a 25-megaton radio active sodium bomb at an altitude of 600 meters over central Paris. Peaceniks should be thankful that the U.S.A. is willing to spend its national wealth and the blood of its youth to keep the passive and complacent infidels of the world safe.
US probably to busy to find a blind chinese, in a dark cave, a moonless night at the moment , would be quite better for us to open some umbrella R. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
Quote:
__________________
" The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
Quote:
Let alone that you're assuming (a) Iran will one day have such a weapon; (b) a method of getting it to a point above Paris; and (c) any reason/desire to do so. And surely you can't be suggesting that France's nukes are no deterrent to conjectural Iranian nuclear aggression? If they aren't then why should you imagine that America's are? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
Really, Nick.
You should go back and read the entire thread focusing in particular on RT's two remarks, especially the first one he made on 19 February 2007 at 11:05, and concurrently consider some of RT's past postings here on 12 O'Clock High with their - and I am being very considerate here - less than favorable American flavor. For someone who bristles rather easily when unjustified mud is slung at the Brits, I would think you might afford the same consideration to others. Larry |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
Did the Luftwaffe every use there bombers to try to strike the 8th AF on the airfields in England to eliminate them? It seems even night raids would have taken out some of the bombers on the ground. They had to know the locations of the bases for the bombers and fighters. Killing civilians was a terrible waste of effort.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
That was out of Luftwaffe's ability, range limit of their bombers, lack of any large numbers of heavy bombers even close to the quality and number of the British night heavy bombers, navigation problem, the excellent British night air defense system, that simply would not do
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
The whole problem, is at which point nd which time we consider the things , 200 years ago no way to be US-frendly or just because brit-foe ??, 150 years it would be better to give some hand to the people South like the brits were ready to ??,100 years ago no way to be ... so much debts, 50 years ago one not really different history, today US probably find more way to be 'friend ' with China as with Europe China is considered at equal level Europe some good dog ,
R |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
Quote:
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
Quote:
But I agree: all of these is WAY off topic and I apologize for taking part in it. I would reply to RT's remark above, but I can't understand what he's saying. L. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Friendly fire WWII | Brian | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 803 | 8th July 2023 15:47 |
What was an ATF in 8th Air Force in 1944? | Larry | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 5 | 5th May 2007 17:31 |
A Question RE: 8th AF raid of April 29,1944 | NickM | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 3 | 25th August 2005 11:00 |
October 8th, 1943 - Attack on Bremen | Jochen Prien | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 4 | 20th July 2005 22:52 |
305 Sqn (Polish) Mosquito SM-G "RZ399" question | Kari Lumppio | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 4 | 9th February 2005 23:19 |