![]() |
|
Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
P-38 Canopy
Would anyone know why the P-38, despite it's long active service and numerous model upgrades, never had it's canopy changed from it's antiquated hinge system to a bubble top?
Visibility alone would have been greatly enhanced. As well as ease of manufacture.
__________________
"Somewhere out there is page 6!" "But Emillo you promised ....... it's postpone" ASWWIAH Member |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: P-38 Canopy
For its time, the P-38 had pretty good rearward visibility - no fuselage behind you. This would have made a bigger difference that getting rid of a few thin frames. A one-piece canopy wouldn't have made as big a difference as it did on conventional aircraft
Blown one-piece canopies back in the day were state of the art for plastic manufacturers. They were quite expensive, and relatively few manufacturers could make them. Maybe the P-51 and P-47 soaked up all the production capacity. When DH began to manufacture the DHC1 in the UK in the early post war period, they went back to a framed canopy because of price and delivery issues of blown canopies at the time. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
P 38 Mission Known 13 February 1945 | Peglar | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 2 | 14th February 2009 18:27 |
Messerschmitt 109E/F canopy Info? | pstrany | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 10 | 9th September 2008 23:00 |
Me 109 canopy with slot at the top?! | Roger Gaemperle | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 29 | 7th November 2007 00:27 |
Jettisoning canopy of Spitfire - possible or not. | Dominik | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 8 | 16th June 2007 08:03 |
Fw 190F-9 canopy question | Morten Jessen | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 19 | 28th March 2005 08:42 |