Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 1st October 2010, 19:49
CJE's Avatar
CJE CJE is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bordeaux (France)
Posts: 1,409
CJE
Mk. XX vs Mk. 20

When did the British Air Ministry change the roman numerals of aircraft versions for arabic numerals?
And why?

Thanks in advance.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 1st October 2010, 20:11
Juha's Avatar
Juha Juha is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,448
Juha is on a distinguished road
Re: Mk. XX vs Mk. 20

IIRC sometimes 1942-43, and the change aplied only to future contracts. Why? A wild guess, the war and massive expansion of RAF had meant that smaller % of supply etc officers had got classical education in public schools, so roman numerals were potentially source of misunderstandings which might have had serious consequences.

Juha
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 1st October 2010, 20:50
Bill Walker's Avatar
Bill Walker Bill Walker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 324
Bill Walker is on a distinguished road
Re: Mk. XX vs Mk. 20

The change actually occurred in 1948. You may be thinking of the introduction of role prefixes (as in F.IX) which occurred in 1942. As for the reason, I suspect it was just easier to write the Arabic numerals, especially when you got up to numbers like XVIII. Also easier to tell apart 7 and 8 than VII and VIII.

I should add that the RCAF switched earlier, in 1945. This was largely due to mark number blocks being allocated in the 10s and 20s for licence built British aircraft in Canada. Can you picture the problems with hand written correspondence requesting what part numbers to use for the Mk. XXIV, XXV and XXVI?
__________________
Bill Walker
Canadian Military Aircraft Serials
www.rwrwalker.ca/index.htm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 1st October 2010, 22:35
Juha's Avatar
Juha Juha is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,448
Juha is on a distinguished road
Re: Mk. XX vs Mk. 20

Hello Bill
to the end of 1942 roman numbers, then new variants in Arabic numbers, from 1948 all a/c variants with Arabic according to Alfred Price. I also recall a 1943 letter from 5th Sea Lord to Air Ministry, which is quoted in Morgan’s & Shacklady’s Spitfire book, in which the Sea Lord used designation F.21, when talking on newest version of Spits in test-phase. He wanted a naval version of it as soon as possible, even if that meant non-folding wings. But it clearly isn't quite clear-cut. Price begin to use Arabic on Mk 18, M & S on F. 21.

Juha
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 2nd October 2010, 07:43
Pilot's Avatar
Pilot Pilot is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Srbija
Posts: 1,546
Pilot is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Mk. XX vs Mk. 20

Mk. XIX still used Roman number, all after the type 20 Spitfires used Arab numbers.
__________________
Srecko Bradic
Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com
Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com/forum
Owner: www.sreckobradic.com
Owner: www.warplanes-zine.com
Email: srecko.warplane@gmail.com
Skype: sreckobradic
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/LetLet...s/308234397758
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 2nd October 2010, 12:47
Graham Boak Graham Boak is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 1,682
Graham Boak is on a distinguished road
Re: Mk. XX vs Mk. 20

I suspect Juha's comment should be qualified to new variants planned after the end of 1942, for clearly new variants entered service with Latin numbers much later than that date.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 2nd October 2010, 13:16
Juha's Avatar
Juha Juha is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,448
Juha is on a distinguished road
Re: Mk. XX vs Mk. 20

Hello Graham
Price in his The Spitfire Story, year 2000 print, ie reprint of the 1995 revised edition, writes "From 1943 until 1948 the new a/c entering service carried arabic mark numbers while the older types retained their roman numerals."

IMHO it maybe would be better to replace "entering service" with "initiated during that period", if even that is entirely correct. Anyway I'm with Pilot and Morgan & Shacklady that initially Mk XVIII and Mk XIX were known with the roman mark numbers, but I'm not a Spitfire specialist.

Juha
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 2nd October 2010, 14:09
Pilot's Avatar
Pilot Pilot is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Srbija
Posts: 1,546
Pilot is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Mk. XX vs Mk. 20

Juha- I am also not very informed about Spitfire but in this moment I completing illustrations for the book about the recce Spitfires and gentleman who are authors state this mark for the Mk. XIX and the later was marked different. By the way- Alfred Price is great author.

Cheers
__________________
Srecko Bradic
Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com
Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com/forum
Owner: www.sreckobradic.com
Owner: www.warplanes-zine.com
Email: srecko.warplane@gmail.com
Skype: sreckobradic
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/LetLet...s/308234397758
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 2nd October 2010, 14:52
Kutscha Kutscha is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,102
Kutscha
Re: Mk. XX vs Mk. 20

There is also engines. There was the Merlin XX but the next Merlin was the 21.

The Mosquito used Roman numerals after B. XX.

I would think someone came to their senses, to keep the number of characters down. ie Mosquito NF. 38 > Mosquito NF. XXXVIII
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 2nd October 2010, 15:52
Graham Boak Graham Boak is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 1,682
Graham Boak is on a distinguished road
Re: Mk. XX vs Mk. 20

I suspect there may not be a single answer. To get away from Spitfires, as far as I know the Halifax continued to use Latin numbers up to the final A Mk.IX, which even as a idea post-dated 1943.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Luftwaffe losses in the east 20-30.01.1945 AreKal Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 36 20th April 2021 14:28
“Operation Pandemonium” Stephen Smith Allied and Soviet Air Forces 11 30th August 2011 22:23
Avro Anson Mk IV Neil Wakefield Allied and Soviet Air Forces 3 10th August 2007 20:43
Thunderbolts and Mustangs versus the Jagdwaffe (split topic) Ruy Horta Allied and Soviet Air Forces 98 9th August 2007 16:22
Mk. XXI or Mk. 21 CJE Allied and Soviet Air Forces 5 13th May 2007 14:12


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net