Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 30th August 2007, 21:04
Juha's Avatar
Juha Juha is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,448
Juha is on a distinguished road
Why DB-3f is counted as one of the old types on 22 June 41?

Hello
I wonder if someone can give a logical explanation why usually when in books the material situation of Soviet AF is given at the beginning of Operation Barbarossa only Pe-2, Il-2, LaGG-3, MiG-3 and Yak-1 are counted as new types and others as old types?

I can understand that I-15, I-15bis/I-152, R-5, R-Z and so on are described as old.

But IMHO it’s a bit more difficult to understand why newer versions of SB (production terminated IIRC in late 1940) and I-16 (production terminated in spring 1941, and at least M-63 powered versions were not so bad fighters after all) or I-153, which was accepted in large scale production c. Oct. 1938, initial deliveries in late spring 1939, in 1940 got more powerful engine and production not stopped until in 1941.

And I cannot understand no other reason than that they were not successes in service in that that the following planes are not included in list of new a/c:Yak-2, first flight in 1939, Yak-4, first flight in 1940 and still in production on 22 June 41 and Su-2, accepted in series production in Jan. 1940 and still in production on 22 June 1941.

And most astonishing thing is that DB-3f (later Il-4) , the mainstay of ADD (Soviet long-range bomber force) throughout the war and which stayed in production into 1945, is not included in the new a/c list and so is at least implicatively counted as an old type. There were some 1’100 of these bombers in strength on 22 June 1941. If one compare the production history of DB-3/DB-3f and He-111, it’s remarkable how similar they were in timing from first acceptance to service through major redesign (He-111P/H and DB-3f) to the end of production. And if one compares the specifications of DB-3f and Jumo-211 engined He 111 Hs they are remarkably similar. I think the only significant difference between them was that He-111H was easier to fly and more manoeuvrable but that doesn’t mean so much when we are comparing bombers.

IMHO this new/old type division was a way to partly explain away the catastrophe of Summer 1941 during Soviet time but why it is still in use?

I think that we all would think it odd if someone would write that LW attacked Soviet Union with xxx Bf 109 Fs and yyy Ju 88 A-4s plus with following old types zzz He-111s, aaa Ju-87 and so on. So why different criteria is in force when we are talking on Soviet AF?

Juha
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US aircaft types ferried on French carrier Bearn, June 1940? Sid Guttridge Allied and Soviet Air Forces 8 31st March 2007 00:33
Me 109 loss on June 21 1944 near Brunswick and Bernoske Roger Gaemperle Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 7 6th March 2007 13:11
Losses of 1./TG1 in France – June 1944. Henofred Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 0 25th October 2006 13:55
Second „Katyn Case” - 22-30 June 1941! Mirek Wawrzynski The Second World War in General 10 19th September 2005 21:41
Luftwaffe Aces KIA in Normandy in 1944 Christer Bergström Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 35 13th August 2005 21:10


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:33.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net