|
Japanese and Allied Air Forces in the Far East Please use this forum to discuss the Air War in the Far East. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sheldon Sutton and the Consolidated PB4Y
Michael,
Here's a link to the VP-117 unit history page in the USN patrol squadron website: http://www.vpnavy.com/vp117_1940.html Go back a few pages and a lot of the other squadrons operating PB4Y-1s and -2s are listed, and the Coronado units too. Happy digging, ...geoff
__________________
- converting fuel into noise. |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Sheldon Sutton and the Consolidated PB4Y
Good evening Geoff,
why are the scorers of the PB4Y's so well-defined whereas the B-24 scorers were not ? Was is because stategic bombing was teamwork whereas the patrol bombers operated alone ? Cheers, Michael |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sheldon Sutton and the Consolidated PB4Y
The Navy gunners were not as imaginative as their Army counterparts?
__________________
George Kernahan |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sheldon Sutton and the Consolidated PB4Y
Michael,
It's a lot like @twocee says..... Analytically, it's the numbers game. B-24s operate in bigger formations (very big in ETO, medium size in MTO, near squadron size in CBI and SWPA). All those gunners shooting at a few fast moving fighters; if one fighter starts to smoke (or just rolls over and accelerates....causing increase in exhaust smoke), 50+ gunners will claim a kill (and we're not talking about any dishonesty, just the real belief that you shoot at something, it smokes and looks like it's going down, so you claim a hit or a kill). Navy PB4Y-1/-2s operate in small numbers, singles or pairs mostly on shipping patrols or ASW. Only occasionally in half-squadron numbers or more, for added numbers in actual bombing raids. The navy claims tend to be more accurately reported, as they have more time to see the result. That's a generalisation, but you get the overall picture. Remember also, that for bomber formation gunners in ETO, the effective range for a 50-cal means the fighter target is about the size of your thumbnail or fingertip to first knuckle with your arm outstretched. The attacking fighter may be the size of your pinkie-finger nail when it starts lobbing 20mm or 30mm cannon shells at you. So the action mostly happens a bit further away. From what I've read of the SWPA bomber ops, the Zeros came in close due to the slow firing nature of their 20mm cannons. Also a lot of the PB4Y kills occurred with them chasing the Japanese aircraft (including a few fighters!). So, I'm guessing much closer range, and hence better to observe actual results. Thinking 'while walking & talking, ...geoff
__________________
- converting fuel into noise. |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Sheldon Sutton and the Consolidated PB4Y
Good evening Gentlemen,
fascinatingly VPB-117 sunk more ships than it shot down planes. The ranking ship destroyer Arthur Elder sunk 19, has the tonnage of that tally ever been indicated ? Have a good start into the new week, Michael |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sheldon Sutton and the Consolidated PB4Y
A couple of pages on medals awarded to Arthur Grant Elder (follow arrows at bottom of 1st page to see 2nd page:
https://valor.militarytimes.com/hero/19110 |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Sheldon Sutton and the Consolidated PB4Y
Good evening RSwank,
thanks for the link. This is the first time I see a photo of Elder. Next month is my wedding anniversary and and the month after that my 42. birthday. Maybe I wish for this book: https://www.amazon.de/Mavis-Emily-PB...rmat=4&depth=1 I wish you a good start into the weekend, Michael |