|
Post-WW2 Military and Naval Aviation Please use this forum to discuss Military and Naval Aviation after the Second World War. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: U.S. aircraft in Vietnam appear to have been extremely vulnerable to AAA
Bill Walker,
Everywhere I looked there were slightly different numbers, but some good numbers would be 1737 losses to hostile fire and 514 operational for the USAF. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: U.S. aircraft in Vietnam appear to have been extremely vulnerable to AAA
One has to look carefully at the various missions before drawing conclusions about vulnearbilty to AAA. The Thuds were dominantly in RP6 with arguably the most intensly concentrated AAA (small arms up to 23mm plus mostly radar tracking 37, 57 and 125 mm) and Sam's, as well as MiG's - all coordinated by BARLOCK radar system. The BARLOCK and gun laying and Fan Song Radar nets around the Sam sites created a hellacious interlocking defense capability.
The introduction of Weasels had a dramatic effect on both loss rates and target bombing effectiveness. The fast movers in the South (F-100's, some A4's, some F-4's) were subjected to lesser AAA (and less sophisticated) than around Hanoi. Steve was right about the overall per sortie loss rates but the preponderance of the high percentage losses were F-105s before the Weasels came to play in 1967.
__________________
" The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: U.S. aircraft in Vietnam appear to have been extremely vulnerable to AAA
If I remember right there was a TV programme in which a vet. said that low level attacks were often made on targets in valleys such as bridges with a narrow approach. He said everybody who had any weapon was just told to fire upwards at attacking aircraft which had to fly through this barrage accounting for many losses.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: U.S. aircraft in Vietnam appear to have been extremely vulnerable to AAA
Another aspect of the tactical environment that I've noticed in my reading is that, in the south, pilots would make up to five passes on a target. That sort of thing was foolish in WW2 but common in Vietnam. Still, the loss rate per sortie was much lower than in WW2 or Korea.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Re: U.S. aircraft in Vietnam appear to have been extremely vulnerable to AAA
IIRC Republic had put some hardening or fire suppression system in F-105 but because USAF wanted to cut down the unit price they were dropped out during production. Not the first or last time when peace time economics became very costly during wartime.
Juha |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: U.S. aircraft in Vietnam appear to have been extremely vulnerable to AAA
Remember, also that the F-105 was designed as a tactical nuclear bomber, not a sustained iron bombing machine, hence infrastructure systems for a different concept.
The A-1 was designed in WWII as a tactical support machine and soldiered on long after it should have. The F-4, in spite of upgrade attempts was designed as a Navy fleet intercepter for Soviet bombers, not a tactical bomber or even a dogfighter. Mr. Johnson's war forced many planes into roles they were never conceived for or designed for. US pilots did an incredible job making them work, anyway. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
403th sqn RCAF against II/JG53 on july 2nd 1944 | Flyingkag | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 8 | 13th April 2012 22:56 |
Re NAGr.13 let me start a new thread | RT | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 3 | 26th March 2010 18:53 |
Fighter pilots' guts | Hawk-Eye | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 44 | 8th April 2005 14:25 |
Luftwaffe fighter losses in Tunisia | Christer Bergström | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 47 | 14th March 2005 04:03 |
U.S. Naval Aircraft ferry squadron photos + doc.s | edwest | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 0 | 14th March 2005 01:27 |