|
Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
Quote:
AFAIK the LW in their infinite wisdom didn't see the value in attcking UK airbases after dark when there was no realistic defense against low level Ju 88 oe Me 410 attacks.
__________________
" The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
The reason "there was no realistic defense against low level Ju 88 oe Me 410 attacks." was that no such scale of night attack occurred before, Luftwaffe could not expect to be so lucky next time.
Luftwaffe could not go after US airbase in UK in the daylight, that would be almost equal to commit suicide. In the night, the limitation of the navigation technology alone would prevent them from finding their target, besides, many US airbases for heavy bombers units located beyond the range of the German medium bombers anyway. And even they found the airport, what the chance their bombs could hit the target? From the experience from RAF, we all know the accuracy of the night time bombing was notoriously low. At last, let us do not forget the fact that RAF night air defense system was among the best in the WWII airforces |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
Quote:
As to 'effective night defense for low level attack? The NVA had the most capable AAA capability in a small area during VietNam and had no defense against F-111. So, the question is whether or not to risk the 0300-0500 strike from French/Dutch bases against the odds of finding the target? Note - I indicated Ju 88 and Me 410s which easily had the range to attack east Anglia targets through D-Day and for those based in southern, eastern and northern France - for some time afterwards - as long as unmolested by strafing fighters in daylight. Further re: night defenses - imagine Mossies and P-61s a.) trying to look down to capture a signal against the clutter and b.) make attacks on a/c flying 100-200 feet AGL? As to finding the airfield but not hitting the targets? ALL 8th AF fighters and bombers fueld the evening before the next mission. Hit One a/c with cannon fire and visibility will be "wonderful".
__________________
" The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
Are you suggesting large numbers of Me-410s and Ju-88s flew all the way from France and low countries to US airbases in UK at low level in the middle of the night then accuratley locate and hit the target ?or am I misunderstood what you said? Because I do not believe any of the WWII era airforces had the that kind of techonlogy.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
British night air defense system was not just “some AAAA units around the airport”, it included mosquito night intruders over continent, excellent radar system, when those “large amount of Me-410s and Ju-88s” reach the airspace even before the UK airspace, they would be detected for sure, than RAF night fighters, armed with the most advanced airborne intercept radar, would be put into action, Flaks from the coast all the way to the US airbases would open fire, what the chance do you think Germans would have?
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
You might want to look at the precedent of Luftflotte 2's bombers over the Corsican airfields on 12/13 May 1944. In early 1944 a significant bomber force had been assembled against Britain and could have included East Anglian bases amongst its targets. An airfield strike amongst the Steinbock city attacks might have succeeded as a one-off at least.
My question though is whether there was any technological barrier to the earlier introduction of the R4M air-to-air rocket? It was a stand-off, fire-and-forget weapon that any fighter could carry with relatively small aerodynamic penalty. A mass release of rockets may have had the potential to disrupt the American combat boxes (irrespective of any hits) prior to engaging with guns. Did nobody think of it in 1943, did it take too longer than expected to develop or was it that everyone went looking for big clumsy solutions? |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
Nick, because of the limitation of the technology in WWII, any night time attack could not be coordinated, in order to commit any kind of large scale and sustained attack on US airbases, Luftwaffe had to first solve the night time navigation problem, which was no way could be done by flying low level all the way from their airports in continent to UK, then come the another problem, how to overcome RAF night air defense system, we all know that Luftwaffe suffered very high losses in the Operation Steinbock, I simply do not see Luftwaffe had any chance, may be some small scale tactic success, no more than that.
By the way, was the WWII era air-to-air rockets were notorious for its inaccuracy? |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
Quote:
The R4M wouldn't have to be that accurate against USAAF combat boxes, if a large number could be released at once they might well have disrupted the formation enough to leave individual bombers more vulnerable to gun attack. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
I am a little confused, what USAAF combat boxes ? I think we were talking about Luftwaffe low level attack US airbases in the night, all of USAAF heavy bombers would be on the ground that time.
And as far as I know, in WWII it was not possible to maintain large formation in night time flying, any large scale of German night time attack would have to go in small group, two or three at best, at first they would suffer losses, possible very high losses, in the hand of British AAA and night figters, if the survivors were lucky enough to find the USAAF airport which I highly doubt, they had to go into attack one or two aircraft a time, there would be no coordination among each other, and would not cause any nearly serious damage. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Re: A 'what if' question RE: LW vs 8th AF
I know that the British radar was very good but the Germans could have caused a lot of trouble in other ways. Bombers mixing in with returning RAF bombers could have slipped into England for strikes. Even a captured B-17 or B-24 returning from a strike with a bomb load to an 8th AF base could have caused a very bad situation (a Trojan horse). The loss of one captured bomber for a massive strike on a base full of bombers would have been worth the trade off.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Friendly fire WWII | Brian | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 803 | 8th July 2023 15:47 |
What was an ATF in 8th Air Force in 1944? | Larry | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 5 | 5th May 2007 17:31 |
A Question RE: 8th AF raid of April 29,1944 | NickM | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 3 | 25th August 2005 11:00 |
October 8th, 1943 - Attack on Bremen | Jochen Prien | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 4 | 20th July 2005 22:52 |
305 Sqn (Polish) Mosquito SM-G "RZ399" question | Kari Lumppio | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 4 | 9th February 2005 23:19 |