Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 3rd February 2005, 12:26
Norbert Neuser Norbert Neuser is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6
Norbert Neuser
Re.: Strange 109 installation

Dear Gents,

some weeks ago, I ran across similar discussions about this 109 at My favourite discussion board named "Luftwaffe Bullet Board". Although picture is well-spreaded - obviously - nothing seems to be able to turn out in facts.

Just an idea (possibly a silly one) that flashes My mind is the fact, that this installation mounted at a 109 for My eyes is somewhat offside by means of a spray-device. Why mocking up a fighter with a strange device like this, if only a tube-like technic may fit it's supposed application?

So all in all My guestimate points to a trial installation af a torpedo mock-up. As well as others I do agree that this Messerschmitt wears a streched wing of the T-subtype.

Just an idea.


Kind regards

Norbert
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 4th February 2005, 01:18
Larry Larry is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Middlesex, England
Posts: 1,016
Larry is on a distinguished road
Bf 109

Looking at the photo I would say that the device is unlikely to be a flame thrower or smoke layer as a much smaller tube could have been fixed to the fuselage underside to branch out either side of the tail, like the Ju88 flame thrower photo (which I think I saw in 'Modell magazin- War Album' 1-5).

I doubt it was a launch rail for a missile, as the underside is U shaped which does not correspond to the usual flat launch rails of the period, and the rail is not parallel with the line of flight and unusually is very close to the forward fuselage at the point the missile would leave the rail. The idea that it was a Hurricat type rail has already been discounted.

If it was a refueling arm (and ahead of its time) it would make no sense in it being connected to a tanker flying below the Bf 109 and working against gravity! And why would the LW use a Bf 109 as the tanker when larger aircraft were available?

If the device does not show a clear operational benefit to the Bf 109, the only explanation left, is that it was flight testing something for another aircraft design. It was quite common at the time for bits of a proposed aircraft to be attached to other for aerodynamic trials. Someone I hope will recognise the device as a strut of a large aircraft, a proposed 'Mistel' or even a leading edge of a wing / strut etc.
__________________
Larry Hayward
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FW190a-3 /A4 AGr123 in France 1943 1944. Eric Larger Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 16 12th June 2011 09:29
Documentation of 2000HP Bf 109s of 1945 Kurfürst Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 5 10th September 2009 12:15
Bf 109E Photo - Which unit? BlackWolf3945 Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 2 29th September 2005 10:24
Eric Mombeek's Eismeerjäger Vol. 2 Kjetil Aakra Books and Magazines 1 2nd February 2005 20:00
Spitfire Hurricane V the BF109e Jon Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 6 21st January 2005 23:57


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 00:19.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net