![]() |
|
Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re.: Strange 109 installation
Dear Gents,
some weeks ago, I ran across similar discussions about this 109 at My favourite discussion board named "Luftwaffe Bullet Board". Although picture is well-spreaded - obviously - nothing seems to be able to turn out in facts. Just an idea (possibly a silly one) that flashes My mind is the fact, that this installation mounted at a 109 for My eyes is somewhat offside by means of a spray-device. Why mocking up a fighter with a strange device like this, if only a tube-like technic may fit it's supposed application? So all in all My guestimate points to a trial installation af a torpedo mock-up. As well as others I do agree that this Messerschmitt wears a streched wing of the T-subtype. Just an idea. Kind regards Norbert |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Bf 109
Looking at the photo I would say that the device is unlikely to be a flame thrower or smoke layer as a much smaller tube could have been fixed to the fuselage underside to branch out either side of the tail, like the Ju88 flame thrower photo (which I think I saw in 'Modell magazin- War Album' 1-5).
I doubt it was a launch rail for a missile, as the underside is U shaped which does not correspond to the usual flat launch rails of the period, and the rail is not parallel with the line of flight and unusually is very close to the forward fuselage at the point the missile would leave the rail. The idea that it was a Hurricat type rail has already been discounted. If it was a refueling arm (and ahead of its time) it would make no sense in it being connected to a tanker flying below the Bf 109 and working against gravity! And why would the LW use a Bf 109 as the tanker when larger aircraft were available? If the device does not show a clear operational benefit to the Bf 109, the only explanation left, is that it was flight testing something for another aircraft design. It was quite common at the time for bits of a proposed aircraft to be attached to other for aerodynamic trials. Someone I hope will recognise the device as a strut of a large aircraft, a proposed 'Mistel' or even a leading edge of a wing / strut etc.
__________________
Larry Hayward |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FW190a-3 /A4 AGr123 in France 1943 1944. | Eric Larger | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 16 | 12th June 2011 09:29 |
Documentation of 2000HP Bf 109s of 1945 | Kurfürst | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 5 | 10th September 2009 12:15 |
Bf 109E Photo - Which unit? | BlackWolf3945 | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 2 | 29th September 2005 10:24 |
Eric Mombeek's Eismeerjäger Vol. 2 | Kjetil Aakra | Books and Magazines | 1 | 2nd February 2005 20:00 |
Spitfire Hurricane V the BF109e | Jon | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 6 | 21st January 2005 23:57 |