Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 4th March 2006, 17:27
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 129
Crumpp
Re: Half painted Fw 190 wing undersides - the purpose?

Quote:
15-20 lb on fighters
I think something got confused here. They have to be talking about per coat of paint on a small fighter.

Either that or our paint guy was refering too the total weight of the paint before he put it on the aircraft. I will find out.

Quote:
Comparison test had shown a gain of between 4 and 7 mph, with weight saving dependent on the aircraft size and model"..
Good stuff. So bare metal was the better of the finishes for US Aircraft. This would not be the first time US results were different from British results in aircraft testing.

Quote:
Naval aircraft continued their finishes,
Certainly. The ocean is the harshest enviroment on earth especially for metals. Corrosion protection is probably on a different priority level in comparision to land base aircraft. Painting and scraping is a career in the Navy.

http://www.gim.bnl.gov/misc/envtest/...corrosion.html

Quote:
Atmospheric corrosion is primarily due to moisture and oxygen but is accentuated by contaminants such as sulphur compounds and sodium chloride (salt spray) Corrosion of steel on a sea coast is 400 to 500 times greatrer than it is in a desert. Steel specimens 80 feet from a coast corroded 12 times faster than those 800 feet away. Salt is the chief contaminant.
I imagine life on a Carrier Deck is very tough on metal airframes.

All the best,

Crumpp
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 14th March 2006, 00:36
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 129
Crumpp
Re: Half painted Fw 190 wing undersides - the purpose?

Quote:
I think something got confused here.
Quote:
15-20 lb on fighters
I remembered to talk to Gary about this issue. I was confused. The paintjob added roughly 800lbs including interior finish to a B17. However on a P51 it only takes 4 gallons to completely paint the airplane.

Both the RLM and the USAAF used cellulose-nitrate based lacquers and the USAAF used Zinc Chromate Primer which is extremely heavy. The finish is thick and chips easily increasing drag.

While the milling of the German paints was much finer, it was their chemical engineering of the fillers that allowed the thinner, lighter, and equally smooth finish, combined with the fact they did not use a heavy metal based primer.

All the best,

Gene
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NEW BOOK - Fw 190 D Camouflage & Markings - Pt. 1 David E. Brown Focke-Wulf Fw 190D Camouflage & Markings 71 31st March 2014 00:16
What were the weight savings from removing FW 190 outer wing cannons? NickM Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 27 19th August 2005 17:06
Hungarian Fw 190 ? (E-Bay photo) Kari Lumppio Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 3 26th April 2005 22:40
Low altitude tests: P-47 vs. Fw 190 Six Nifty .50s Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 4 20th April 2005 01:13
The remarkable William Tex Ash, 24 March '42 Brendan Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 3 4th February 2005 19:55


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:59.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net