Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 6th July 2007, 14:47
Franek Grabowski Franek Grabowski is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 2,443
Franek Grabowski is on a distinguished road
Re: Me 262 should have been used as a bomber?

Guys, guys, guys... Robert, Spitfire XIX was an unarmed PR aircraft. She had better altitude performance than any jet up into 1950s. Up to appearance of MiG-15 they were flying untouched over the Soviet territories and Soviets had somewhat better jets than Germans.
Kutscha, you certainly mean PR.XI. How could a Spitfire flying at about 14 kms been intercepted by a Me 262 able to reach 11,5 km?
  #62  
Old 6th July 2007, 16:15
Roger Gaemperle's Avatar
Roger Gaemperle Roger Gaemperle is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,064
Roger Gaemperle is on a distinguished road
Re: Me 262 should have been used as a bomber?

Nick

I understand that tactical value was not only limited to speed. Also, maneuverability and as you said how fast it could intercept, etc. is important. Nevertheless, due to the high speed of the jets they could reach a target much faster than e.g. a Me 109 once they were at the same level. Of course there are pros and cons of the Me 262 (low manouverability compared to piston engined aircraft, unreliable engines, etc.) but if it hadn't been a superior aircraft IN GENERAL and the Spitfire and Meteors far superior the Allied wouldn't have touched it after the war (e.g. only very few Me 109 K-4 were captured and tested after the war compared to Me 262s).
Of course, if you compare it with aircraft that were specifically designed for special roles (e.g. rocket interceptor, high altitude recon aircraft, pure fighter bomber, etc.) you will always find an aircraft superior in one specific feature: The P-51 was more maneuverable, the P-47 the more accurate fighter bomber, the Spitfire XIX the higher (and faster?) flying recon aircraft, the Me 163 the faster climbing fighter, the Lancaster the more weight carrying aircraft, etc. etc. So, there won't be an ultimate truth to this discussion but only arguments for and against one's point of view. And I don't want to say that one was better than the other as it is very difficult to compare aircraft that had different purposes.

What I just wanted to say is that IN MY OPINION (and I don't claim this to be the absolute truth neither) what caused the higher losses of Me 262 to Allied fighters than vice versa was the far superior number of enemy aircraft in the sky of the Reich at the end of the war. Of course there are many other factors that added to this: poor quality of training of young German pilots at the end of the war, unreliable technology, unexperience with flying jets at high speed, new tacticts, etc. etc. And even if the Germans had enough fuel, experienced pilots, sovereignty over their airspace, larger numbers of own fighter in the sky than Allied ones, there would still have been losses of Me 262, but I think the balance would have looked quite different. But as this is a "what if" question, nobody can answer it but just argue for or against it.

Franek, thanks for the correction. As I said, I am not a Spitfire expert and didn't even know that the XIX is an unarmed recon variant. Sorry for my ignorance.

Regards
Roger Gaemperle
  #63  
Old 6th July 2007, 19:56
Kutscha Kutscha is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,102
Kutscha
Re: Me 262 should have been used as a bomber?

Franek, the service ceiling of the PR XIX was 42,600ft (13km). Did they always fly at their service ceiling? Btw, the Spit XIV had the approx. same max speed at the same altitude (~26kft) as the PR XIX and had a service ceiling ~1000ft higher than the PR XIX.

http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spitfire-XIV-ads.jpg
  #64  
Old 6th July 2007, 21:36
Franek Grabowski Franek Grabowski is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 2,443
Franek Grabowski is on a distinguished road
Re: Me 262 should have been used as a bomber?

Roger, sorry for 'changing' your name, call it temporary mental disablement.
Otherwise I do not agree with the numerical superiority argument. It is a common excuse but I would hardly call it a decisive factor. At least not in the context.
Kutscha, in 1950s they flew at 14+ kms, perhaps at an earlier date they were not cleared for more. Nonetheless note that mentioned 13 km (have not checked it) is an operational altitude which is still 1,5 km more than the maximum ceiling of Me 262. Add to this obvious problems with intercepting the target and it means Spitfire 19 (post war marking) was untouchable.
  #65  
Old 6th July 2007, 21:39
CJE's Avatar
CJE CJE is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bordeaux (France)
Posts: 1,409
CJE
Re: Me 262 should have been used as a bomber?

Franek, OK, the PR Spit was out of reach.
But was it a decisive factor in winning the air war over the Reich? Obviously not. Outnumbering the LW was!
  #66  
Old 6th July 2007, 22:04
Andy Fletcher's Avatar
Andy Fletcher Andy Fletcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 777
Andy Fletcher
Re: Me 262 should have been used as a bomber?

If my memory serves me correctly didn't Eric Brown the famous British Test Pilot say the Me 262 was probably the best aircraft he had ever flown (I think it was during some documentary on Discovery). He flew practically all British aircraft types, as well as many American and Axis types.

However even if the aircraft possessed great performance it would count for nothing if plagued with serviceability problems, used in the wrong role, grounded due to lack of fuel or unavailable in sufficient numbers which the Me 262 often was.

A revolutionary aircraft but too little too late.
__________________
Per Speculationem Impellor ad Intelligendum
  #67  
Old 6th July 2007, 22:16
Juha's Avatar
Juha Juha is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,448
Juha is on a distinguished road
Re: Me 262 should have been used as a bomber?

Hello Andy
IIRC Brown's writings he wrote that the best planes he flew were Spitfire/Seafire and F-86 Sabre.
  #68  
Old 6th July 2007, 22:30
Andy Fletcher's Avatar
Andy Fletcher Andy Fletcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 777
Andy Fletcher
Re: Me 262 should have been used as a bomber?

Hi Juha,

Like I said I was going on memory and TV interviews/documentaries are often edited so that comments are quoted out of context. Maybe he said "one of the best" aircraft he had ever flown or the "best Axis type".

Thanks for the correction
__________________
Per Speculationem Impellor ad Intelligendum
  #69  
Old 6th July 2007, 22:52
Graham Boak Graham Boak is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 1,683
Graham Boak is on a distinguished road
Re: Me 262 should have been used as a bomber?

I seem to have lost my last two posts.

At the risk of wandering too far from the point, can I point out that the ability to fly reconnaissance missions anywhere over enemy territory, with little or no effect interference: to see what the enemy has got, where it is placed, what he is doing with it, and the results of your own actions; certainly should have been decisive. Not THE decisive effort, but one of the most important. I would also point out that being outnumbered did not seem to be a problem to the Germans earlier in the war. Simply being outnumbered was not decisive in itself.
  #70  
Old 6th July 2007, 23:19
ArtieBob ArtieBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sharps Chapel, TN USA
Posts: 448
ArtieBob will become famous soon enoughArtieBob will become famous soon enough
Re: Me 262 should have been used as a bomber?

Just a quick note on outnumbering the Luftwaffe. IIRC, the Eastern front in the final stages of the war might have seemed a better area to demonstrate the effect of overwhelming numerical superiority against the Luftwaffe. However, using the Luftwaffe's own data, loss rates per mission were several times higher in the West versus the East. There are many factors which may have affected the numbers, but allied numeric superiority is probably overplayed and does not give enough weight the relative level of tactics, training and equipment opposing the Luftwaffe late in the war.

Best Regards,

Artie Bob
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KG51 Me 262 claims / confirmed kills & Me 262 9K+BH Roger Gaemperle Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 4 27th November 2017 21:44
Me 262 wn 111755 FRANCESCO M LENTINI Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 5 29th November 2006 02:53
VVS divisions Mike35nj Allied and Soviet Air Forces 2 7th August 2006 13:27
Losses of B-17's in RCM role paul peters Allied and Soviet Air Forces 4 15th February 2006 20:57
Bomber Aces Jim Oxley Allied and Soviet Air Forces 18 14th October 2005 19:46


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 13:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net