Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 29th November 2010, 23:14
richard.k richard.k is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sioux Lookout, Canada
Posts: 93
richard.k
Re: The momentous cost of Bomber Command.

3 Squadrons from the RCAF contingent in Africa attacked Foggia railyards with an average load of 4,500 lbs of ordinance from between 8 to 10,000 feet in mid August 43 at night with Wellington X's. Looking though other August attacks, there was nothing above 10,000 feet and some crews down to as low as 6,000 feet. Bombing accuracy would obviously be better, defences lighter. I wouldn't relish the thought of pounding over the Ruhr at between those heights, day or night. A whole different ball game.
Richard
  #82  
Old 30th November 2010, 00:25
Kutscha Kutscha is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,102
Kutscha
Re: The momentous cost of Bomber Command.

Quote:
And please remember that this large bomb could be carried by the 54 Mosquito B Mk IVs that were modified by BC with a bulged bomb bay. So I believe the Mosquito was up to fulfilling the Transportation Plan had that aircraft been available in numbers - which it would have been in the absence of BC.
That would be 20 B.Mk IVs, not 54.

That would be the 4000lb 'blast' bomb, the Cookie. BC didn't modify the Mosquito, deHavilland did. deHavilland also built a few 'pregnant' B. Mk XIs of the 54 built and 390 'pregnant' B.Mk XVIs.

Bomb load was 4 x 500lb bombs.

Tell us Tony how the Mosquito could have been built in greater numbers. To carry a similar weight of bombs as the Lancaster and Halifax on a mission, up to 7 times as many Mosquitoes would be required. Where were all these extra highly trained pilots and navigators to come from?
  #83  
Old 30th November 2010, 04:55
glider1 glider1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 66
glider1 is on a distinguished road
Re: The momentous cost of Bomber Command.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kutscha View Post
That would be 20 B.Mk IVs, not 54.

That would be the 4000lb 'blast' bomb, the Cookie. BC didn't modify the Mosquito, deHavilland did. deHavilland also built a few 'pregnant' B. Mk XIs of the 54 built and 390 'pregnant' B.Mk XVIs.

Bomb load was 4 x 500lb bombs.

Tell us Tony how the Mosquito could have been built in greater numbers. To carry a similar weight of bombs as the Lancaster and Halifax on a mission, up to 7 times as many Mosquitoes would be required. Where were all these extra highly trained pilots and navigators to come from?
Depending on the range wanted Mossie's often carried 2 x 500lb bombs under the wing. The 'pregnant' mosquito could carry 6 x 500lb bombs internally.

The extra highly trained pilots and navigators would probably come from the crews not shot down in Lancasters and Halifax's. The Mosquito loss rate was a fraction of the Heavy Bombers and only heaven knows how many lives would have been saved.
  #84  
Old 30th November 2010, 09:00
Juha's Avatar
Juha Juha is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,448
Juha is on a distinguished road
Re: The momentous cost of Bomber Command.

Hello Glider
Lanc load to railway yards in France seems to have been 13 - 14 x 1000lb, 1 x 4000lb + 16 x 500lb or 18 x 500lb and in Western Germany 16 x 500 + 30 x 40lb, so one Lanc could carry a same load than 3 – 4 Mossies and that 13 – 14 x 1000lb load would have been uneconomical to divide to Mossies, unbulged Mk IV could carry 1 x 1000lb + 2 x 500lb, I’m not sure if even bulged bomb bay had enough width for 2 1000lb GPs. Marshalling yards were one of the target types which suited better to Lanc than Mossie or Boston.

Juha
  #85  
Old 30th November 2010, 09:38
Steve Smith's Avatar
Steve Smith Steve Smith is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kent
Posts: 609
Steve Smith is on a distinguished road
Re: The momentous cost of Bomber Command.

I thought this thread was finished, but it has sprung back to life.


For what we are about to receive !!!!!!!

Is it me or is this subject becoming somewhat stretched out and monotonous !!!
__________________
No.218(Gold Coast) Squadron Association Historian
  #86  
Old 30th November 2010, 10:04
Allan125 Allan125 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cornwall/UK
Posts: 250
Allan125 is on a distinguished road
Re: The momentous cost of Bomber Command.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Smith View Post
I thought this thread was finished, but it has sprung back to life.

For what we are about to receive !!!!!!!

Is it me or is this subject becoming somewhat stretched out and monotonous !!!
hi Steve

I have to agree with you and cannot see where we go from here!!

Allan
__________________
Allan Hillman
  #87  
Old 30th November 2010, 10:32
SES's Avatar
SES SES is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 05 ON LT 8
Posts: 709
SES
Re: The momentous cost of Bomber Command.

I concur. May I suggest this finishing note please:

RETURN AT DAWN



By Morris Marshall
(RNZAF Overseas, from Contact, Feb 1944)

The early dawn has seen their first homecoming,
Has seen them struggle grimly through the skies.
The skylark hearkens to the engines' pulsing
and feels akin to every man who flies.

The grazing beast lifts gentle eyes in wonder
To gaze upon the victors' brave return
But knows not of the dangers that beset them
Who flew into the dark of early morn.

And winging back from out the far horizons,
Now hidden deep in smoke from work well done
The bomber crews give thanks to One Almighty
Who gave them strength to battle till they won.


bregds
SES
  #88  
Old 30th November 2010, 12:25
CJE's Avatar
CJE CJE is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bordeaux (France)
Posts: 1,409
CJE
Re: The momentous cost of Bomber Command.

If everyone could use the standard police size, it would help to read each post without us having gaping zombie eyes at the end of the thread.

Merci.
  #89  
Old 30th November 2010, 14:57
John Beaman John Beaman is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
Posts: 2,155
John Beaman is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: The momentous cost of Bomber Command.

Well, I think this thread has outlived its usefulness. I'm closing it.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bomber Command failure at Urft Dam. tcolvin Allied and Soviet Air Forces 31 29th September 2012 18:44
Special Op Bomber - Bomber Command Memorial fundraising offer Steve Darlow Books and Magazines 0 12th October 2010 23:35
West Raynham Shrapnel and RAF Bomber Command Tapper Allied and Soviet Air Forces 2 16th April 2010 17:30
Searching for informations 22.11.1943 Dr.Who Allied and Soviet Air Forces 3 15th August 2007 12:33
VVS divisions Mike35nj Allied and Soviet Air Forces 2 7th August 2006 13:27


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:42.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net