Ju 88 In lufthansa service

[Snautzer]

there must be sources i guess. Combining type wrknr and name, we get for now:

1. Lufthansa Ju88 S-3 WNr 331394 D-ASHJ „Panther"
2. Lufthansa Ju88 S-3 WNr 331397 D-ASHK „Wolf"
3. Lufthansa Ju88 S-3 WNr 331402 D-ASHM „Jaguar

Maybe Ednorth can trough in some thoughts on this

[andreas_v]

Hello!
The source for the information about Lufthansa's Ju 88 comes from the "Flugzeugverzeichnis Nr.53" (aircraftlist No.53) of the DHL, dated 5.März 1945. Faksimile of that list was published in Werner Bittner's "Die Lufthansa im Krieg-die Jahre 1939-1945", Volume 2

[Stig Jarlevik]

Originally Posted by andreas_v

Hello!
The source for the information about Lufthansa's Ju 88 comes from the "Flugzeugverzeichnis Nr.53" (aircraftlist No.53) of the DHL, dated 5.März 1945. Faksimile of that list was published in Werner Bittner's "Die Lufthansa im Krieg-die Jahre 1939-1945", Volume 2

Thanks

So now we know the details are correct.

Cheers
Stig

[edNorth]

Originally Posted by Snautzer

Maybe Ednorth can trough in some thoughts on this

"through in" "thoughts" humm.... If you go thrugh you are in at the same time. Yes, right. But cutting the ... english.

If I knew more, I possibly not tell.
As I don´t, I can. But see a possible fault .. (True or False).
So I do know. Also know of "others".
So I appear know more, but will say only this ...

DLH age 19 years (Jan 1926). About 2,7 lists per year.
(DLH formed 01.1926. List No. 53 - March 45).
One list every 4,4 months or so.
List No. 52 then was November 1944??
Does this list exist for confirmation?
Does it contain Ju 88´s?

Stig are "details that ere correct" which?

Ed "through in - now out!"
Not an attack or anything remotetly similar.

[Stig Jarlevik]

Originally Posted by edNorth

Stig are "details that ere correct" which?

The WNr vs registrations

Cheers
Stig

[edNorth]

Not seen any "confirmation" but possibly someone can forward this.
And now this happened. So "likely confirmed" but so far only based on one doc from above mentioned book.

[Snautzer]

Originally Posted by edNorth

"through in" "thoughts" humm.... If you go thrugh you are in at the same time. Yes, right. But cutting the ... english.

"
Not an attack or anything remotetly similar.

My only excuse is my phone is sometimes creating words that do not exist and i do not use a spellings checker. But thank you for the lesson and the answer.