Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #461  
Old 3rd January 2009, 17:41
dahiot daniel's Avatar
dahiot daniel dahiot daniel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rennes FRANCE
Posts: 166
dahiot daniel
Re: Friendly fire WWII

Quote:
Originally Posted by dahiot daniel View Post
Brian,

Here are three examples known to me.
05/08/1944. Lysander V9748. Shot taken by mistake for a Henschel 126.

http://www.absa39-45.asso.fr/5%20aou...k_anglais.html

08/08/1944. Albemarle P1501. Shot dead in error by 604 Sqn (Mosquito). mistaken for a Do 217.
http://www.absa39-45.asso.fr/9%20aout%2044/aout44.html

P-47 D-5 RE, serial 42-8491. Strafed the HQ of General Patton in Mayenne. It was shot for an anti-aircraft battery of 20 mm. Its pilot 1st Lt. Louis Alphonse G (KIA).


http://www.absa39-45.asso.fr/P47/p47.html
Link bad : new : http://www.absa39-45.asso.fr/9%20aout%2044/aout44.html
Reply With Quote
  #462  
Old 3rd January 2009, 17:54
Brian Brian is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Posts: 3,972
Brian is on a distinguished road
Re: Friendly fire WWII

Thanks once again Dahiot

Cheers
Brian
Reply With Quote
  #463  
Old 28th January 2009, 22:21
revell222 revell222 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3
revell222 is on a distinguished road
Re: Friendly fire WWII

No doubt you have got Lt Col GR Johnson's P-38 with its famous RAAF Boomerang shoot down and kill marking but what about Cundles' "Bad Angel" with its scoreboard with nine German, Italian, Japanese and one American symbol. Contact me at revell2000 (at) hotmail.com for picture sources if you haven't got them.
Reply With Quote
  #464  
Old 28th January 2009, 23:44
Brian Brian is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Posts: 3,972
Brian is on a distinguished road
Re: Friendly fire WWII

Many thanks Treble 2

Yes, I am aware of this incident and have seen a relevant photo but would appreciate references you imply.

Cheers
Brian
Reply With Quote
  #465  
Old 29th January 2009, 11:38
revell222 revell222 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3
revell222 is on a distinguished road
Re: Friendly fire WWII

Correction - name = Curdes. Actually two incidents. Give me your email or reply to mine and I will send you scans of pics etc.
Reply With Quote
  #466  
Old 29th January 2009, 15:27
Brian Brian is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Posts: 3,972
Brian is on a distinguished road
Re: Friendly fire WWII

Hi Treble 2,

Thanks - my e-mail address is

briancullauthor@fsmail.net

I look forward to seeing the scans.

Cheers
Brian
Reply With Quote
  #467  
Old 31st January 2009, 11:04
revell222 revell222 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3
revell222 is on a distinguished road
Re: Friendly fire WWII

Email sent with pictures.

It would be interesting if your book tried to make some estimates of aircraft lost from different causes.
1. I imagine non-operational losses would be the largest category for every airforce. Training, foolish aerobatics, mechanical failure etc.
2. Everyone knows about the enormous scores of the top Luftwaffe aces (even if they are discounted 50% they still make Allied ones look pale) but reason dictates that far more Luftwaffe aircraft must have been shot down than Allied ones.
3, Friendly fire must be a significant factor.
A difficult statistical challenge requiring much guesswork and assumptions - we will be interested to see the results though!
Reply With Quote
  #468  
Old 24th March 2009, 12:40
Laurent Rizzotti Laurent Rizzotti is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,917
Laurent Rizzotti is on a distinguished road
Re: Friendly fire WWII

Hi Brian,

Found another example of air-to-ground friendly fire: Verviers, Belgium, was on 11 October 1944 bombed by P-38s, killing 16 Belgian civilians and 4 GI's.

Source:
http://books.google.fr/books?id=f3RP...&lr=#PPA173,M1

Edited:

And another some days before on the other side of the world:

On 7 October 1944, two Indian M.L. (1118 and 1119) were sunk by friendly aircraft in "Indian waters" (or off Burma?) and 9 men were killed. On the same day several crew of other ML were also lost, maybe in the same attack

Source:
http://www.hmsmedusa.org.uk/HDML_Roll_of_honour.html
http://www.hmsmedusa.org.uk/HDML_Story_1944.html
http://www.naval-history.net/xDKCas1944-10OCT.htm

Last edited by Laurent Rizzotti; 24th March 2009 at 17:25.
Reply With Quote
  #469  
Old 25th March 2009, 16:08
Laurent Rizzotti Laurent Rizzotti is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,917
Laurent Rizzotti is on a distinguished road
Re: Friendly fire WWII

The link below (in French) is the copy of an article of the French "Revue Historique des Armées", the official history magazine of the French Army, written in 1985 and describing the French bomber attack against Sedan bridges on 14 May 1940.

http://pagesperso-orange.fr/xavier.d...er/revhist.htm

In the conclusion, the far more massive commitment and losses of the RAF Blenheim and Battles is evocated, but with comments I have not seen before:

"Quant au bombardement anglais, le récit repris partout de l’écrivain quasi officiel Peter Ellis est impressionnant : 73 Battle et 36 Blenheim seraient allés bombarder les ponts de Sedan et 45 auraient été abattus. Mais les comptes rendus britanniques que l’on trouve au SHAA à Vincennes font apparaître une grande incohérence de ce côté : confusion de lieu, bombardement de troupes françaises et de ponts en territoire ami, et méconnaissance là aussi du seul objectif valable ce jour-là : le pont de bateaux de Gaulier. C’est un autre point d’histoire à éclaircir."

My translation:
"Concerning the English bombers, the story repeated everywhere of the the quasi-official writer Peter Ellis is impressive: 73 Battle and 36 Blenheim were sent to bomb Sedan bridges and 45 were shot down. But the British reports that one can find at the SHAA at Vincennes shot great incoherency on RAF part: confusion of place, bombing of French troops and bridges in friendly territory, and ignorance of the only worthwhile goal that day the boatbridge of Gaulier. This is another historical point to be clarified."

OK, it's 25 years old but I wonder if there is something true there.
Reply With Quote
  #470  
Old 26th March 2009, 10:23
Brian Brian is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Posts: 3,972
Brian is on a distinguished road
Re: Friendly fire WWII

Hi Laurent

Many thanks and welcome back, your contibutions are most useful.

Cheers
Brian
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SWP Friendly Fire Franek Grabowski Japanese and Allied Air Forces in the Far East 13 8th February 2011 09:37
Friendly fire losses Nonny Allied and Soviet Air Forces 5 23rd May 2009 18:56
Just how good was German Flak Jon Allied and Soviet Air Forces 10 1st June 2005 05:12
wierd incident involving P47 and 'friendly fire' Lagarto Allied and Soviet Air Forces 0 26th March 2005 18:43
56th FG - friendly fire case on 4 May 1943 - info needed Lagarto Allied and Soviet Air Forces 28 12th March 2005 23:33


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 22:39.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net