Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12th July 2017, 22:59
Stig Jarlevik Stig Jarlevik is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,826
Stig Jarlevik will become famous soon enough
Heinkel 111 H WNr 5306

Hallo again

Since I was doing so great with my He 111 J post, I thought I was going to try my luck with a He 111 H

For some reason I have noted down WNr 5306 as a H-10 with STKZ NN+DM and completely w/o with FFS C 10 on 12.8.1943.
Trying to combine this wisdom with what I have on the 'real' 5306 (a H-2) is not easy (read impossible)

I am not asking you to answer where I did go wrong, but rather please set me straight with regard to STKZ NN+DM which I believe is the 'culprit'

Cheers
Stig
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13th July 2017, 06:32
ju55dk's Avatar
ju55dk ju55dk is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,073
ju55dk will become famous soon enough
Re: Heinkel 111 H WNr 5306

NN+DM He 111 H-10 Wnr 5306 with FFS C 19 AND LATER FFS C 22.

Junker
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13th July 2017, 07:11
Stig Jarlevik Stig Jarlevik is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,826
Stig Jarlevik will become famous soon enough
Re: Heinkel 111 H WNr 5306

Thanks Junker

The problem is that WNr 5306 was built as a H-2.
Was it converted, and if so when?

Since I also have a large number of reports for WNr 5306 as TQ+NX; LNS 1 (1.1.40-9.40); 2./Aufkl.Gr. 22 (dam 24.10.40); GrKFS 4 (3.42); KGrzbV 5 (4.42); BFS 5 (3.43-11.43) it is a bit hard to fit in the other details you provide and also its complete loss on 12.8.43

Cheers
Stig
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13th July 2017, 11:04
ju55dk's Avatar
ju55dk ju55dk is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,073
ju55dk will become famous soon enough
Re: Heinkel 111 H WNr 5306

Hi Stig.

You are right that there is something that don't add up with these 2 Skz. Wnr are not unique.

Junker
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14th July 2017, 00:32
Jim P. Jim P. is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,967
Jim P. will become famous soon enough
Re: Heinkel 111 H WNr 5306

I have the same issue with 'this' machine. Would the SKZ have been changed if the machine had been rebuilt??

He 111H-2, 5306, n.n., , , 2.(F), 22, , , , , 24-Oct-40, Crashed during taxiing., , Deutschland, Gen.Qu.6.Abt. (mfm #2)-Vol.3; BoB, T&N, p.694; Mason, p.457, , Lübeck, 35%, H, , ,

He 111H-, 5306?, n.n., , , , KGr.z.b.V. 5, , TQ+NX, TQ+NX, , 06-Apr-42, Attacked twice. Severely damaged in 2nd attack. Notlandung due to damage to both engines. Bf & Bm WIA., Right WNr.? SKZ mismatch with another loss for same WNr., Transportverbände/Eins.Osten, Gen.Qu.6.Abt. (mfm #6)-Vol.9; KTB Nr. 1 der KG.z.b.V. 5, , bei Baltinava, 70km südwestlich Ostrow, b, F, Bf Gefr. Gerhard Franke & Bm Uffz. Heinrich Henschen, ,

He 111, 5306?, Hau, vom, , , , Blindflugsch. 5, , TQ+NX, TQ+NX, , 24-May-42, FB entry., SKZ assigned in Nov-39 with Lw.Gr.Nachr.Sch. 1 at Welzow., Polen, FB vom Hau, , Fl.Pl. Semlin, -, H, , ,

He 111H-10, 5306, n.n., , , , Flzg.Führ.Sch. C 10, , NN+DM, NN+DM, , 12-Aug-43, Crashed due to pilot error. Sch Schug killed, Bm and 2nd Sch injured., , Lw.Bfh.Mitte/Deutschland, BA-MA Signatur RL 2 III/776, Flzg.Unfälle bei Schulen und usw., p.85; BA-MA Signatur RL 2 III/783, Flzg.Unfälle bei Schulen und usw., p.79; Salonen via TOCH on 19-Dec-11, , Fürstenwalde, 100%, H, Bm Uffz. Gerhard Zenker, Sch Uffz. Robert Schug & Sch Ogefr. Alex Sperling, ,
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14th July 2017, 03:33
edNorth edNorth is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,126
edNorth is on a distinguished road
Re: Heinkel 111 H WNr 5306

Just a thought, two penny. Not proof but just indication. TQ+ has me think it might be H-3 (and Trainer H-10 at later date) and similar to ATG built some He 111 H-3s with ferry registrations in TT+xx, TU+xx in 1939/1940 period before going "normal Stkz." - These were in 56xx range. There were other Tx+xx in range below - 5396 He 111 TG+KA Wekusta 2 - OPS shot down (100%) by 236 SQ at 1700 hrs, ditching at POS 4850N/1015W 23.09.1940. -Ed
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14th July 2017, 09:55
RolandF RolandF is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 935
RolandF is on a distinguished road
Re: Heinkel 111 H WNr 5306

Sounds reasonable. Looking at hte timeframe a "regular" StKz might have been applied when being rebuilt into a He 111H-10.

Regards
RolandF
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14th July 2017, 11:59
Stig Jarlevik Stig Jarlevik is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,826
Stig Jarlevik will become famous soon enough
Re: Heinkel 111 H WNr 5306

Gentlemen, thanks for the responses.

Jim
The situation seems to be even worse than I thought. Will have to check your input vs what I got already.
However (no proof) I doubt the STKZ changed if an airframe was modified, at least not when the modification was as small as in this case.

Ed/Roland
Volker Koos is absolutely certain that WNr 5306 was an ATG built H-2 and as such (if rebuilt) it should be rebuilt as a double stick trainer and designated H-10. As far as I can determine, no Heinkel 111 trainers were built from scratch. They were all modified airframes. I doubt this airframe was first modified into a H-3 and then again into a H-10.

But again I know too little to say anything further in this case.
But please keep on with your suggestions. I truly enjoy all of them

Cheers
Stig
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14th July 2017, 23:28
edNorth edNorth is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,126
edNorth is on a distinguished road
Re: Heinkel 111 H WNr 5306

Difference of H-2 and H-3 was armament fitted AFAIK
not really a conversion, matter of preference
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15th July 2017, 06:20
ju55dk's Avatar
ju55dk ju55dk is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,073
ju55dk will become famous soon enough
Re: Heinkel 111 H WNr 5306

Volker Koos is right. See attached LW document.

Junker

Last edited by ju55dk; 25th August 2018 at 17:23.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two Heinkel 111 J losses (with the same WNr 5050) Stig Jarlevik Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 23 5th August 2017 11:43
We need some help regarding KG 40 Bordeaux-Merignac hans_wittman Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 35 23rd September 2015 03:22
did the Heinkel 111 WNr 2214 participate to Guernica ? gilles collaveri Pre-WW2 Military and Naval Aviation 3 26th December 2012 08:49
Luftwaffe Ju 88 in Italy, July 1940 edNorth Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 12 16th August 2010 03:40
Heinkel He 111 WNr 677 Rune Rautio Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 0 16th October 2006 00:36


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:40.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net