Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th December 2020, 10:37
Roger Gaemperle's Avatar
Roger Gaemperle Roger Gaemperle is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,064
Roger Gaemperle is on a distinguished road
Correct designation of Lichtenstein radar

Hello,

I have found variations of the FuG 220, FuG 202 and FuG 212 designations in various post-war books as well as wartime Allied intelligence reports. Which one is correct (i.e. used in German wartime documents)?

FuG 220: Lichtenstein SN2, SN 2, SN-2
FuG 202: Lichtenstein B/C-1, B/C, BC
FuG 212: Lichtenstein C1, C-1

Thanks!

Roger
__________________
www.vintageeagle.com

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 8th December 2020, 14:38
Revi16 Revi16 is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,313
Revi16 is on a distinguished road
Re: Correct designation of Lichtenstein radar

Perhaps the answers are in here?

https://www.cdvandt.org/D-Luft-T-4103-FuG%20202-Li.pdf
https://www.cdvandt.org/D-Luft-T-410...aet-FuG212.pdf
https://www.cdvandt.org/D-Luft-T-411...tehandbuch.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 8th December 2020, 14:42
Roger Gaemperle's Avatar
Roger Gaemperle Roger Gaemperle is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,064
Roger Gaemperle is on a distinguished road
Re: Correct designation of Lichtenstein radar

Thank you. I had checked these wartime manuals already, but they don't contain the code names, i.e. Lichtenstein etc.
__________________
www.vintageeagle.com

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 8th December 2020, 20:05
ju55dk's Avatar
ju55dk ju55dk is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,073
ju55dk will become famous soon enough
Re: Correct designation of Lichtenstein radar

FuG 220
BAMA

Junker

Last edited by ju55dk; 18th February 2021 at 17:26.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 8th December 2020, 22:36
Roger Gaemperle's Avatar
Roger Gaemperle Roger Gaemperle is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,064
Roger Gaemperle is on a distinguished road
Re: Correct designation of Lichtenstein radar

Thank you very much Junker! That's a very interesting document. Do you know the date when this was published? I assume sometimes late 1944 as the Streuwellen IV, V, VI are mentioned. Based on the document it seems that Taunus was linked to Streuwelle VI. I have not seen this in any other documents so far.

The indicated maximum range (5 km) is lower than what most other sources I found (post-war books and wartime Allied intelligence reports) stated. The consensus was about 8 km, but it seems that this is not correct and it was only 5 km.

I assume there was no similar data sheet for the B/C and C1?
__________________
www.vintageeagle.com

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 9th December 2020, 17:54
richdlc richdlc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 350
richdlc will become famous soon enough
Re: Correct designation of Lichtenstein radar

Roger - this link will be of interest. It's from the 'War Thunder' flight sim game but these guys seem to be uber geeks when it comes to knowledge. I am using some of this info for the chapter I am writing for our He 219 book

https://forum.warthunder.com/index.p...j-wrong-radar/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 9th December 2020, 19:07
ju55dk's Avatar
ju55dk ju55dk is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,073
ju55dk will become famous soon enough
Re: Correct designation of Lichtenstein radar

Sadly they are not that correct using the 2a to 2d suffix to FuG 220 wich was a post war invention by Greene.
They have no sources from Bundesarchiv.
Junker

Last edited by ju55dk; 10th December 2020 at 08:03.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10th December 2020, 04:42
David E. Brown's Avatar
David E. Brown David E. Brown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bedford, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 287
David E. Brown will become famous soon enough
Re: Correct designation of Lichtenstein radar

Jørn,

Interesting.

Gebhard Aders in his book uses these lowercase letter designations (Appendix 10). I wonder where he derived them from? What does Fritz Trenkle have to say on this in his book (not in my library unfortunately)? Presumably both gentlemen consulted official sources in their research. Nevertheless, perhaps the first three versions of the SN2 (i.e. a,b,c) did not use these designations, but it does appear that the “d” suffix was used - at least on the aircraft themselves.

Photographs reveal that in most cases features of the radar type was indicated on the fin of Ju88G-6s and Bf110G-4s (or also the nose of the He219). It was occasionally painted in black, but more often in white where it tended to be obscured by reflection or camouflage paint. Sometimes one sees simply a Roman numeral (IV, V, VI) with no other letters, other times with one or both letters in uppercase.

For example, I would interpret VD/R or V/DR in the following manner:
  • V = SN2 frequency range 5 (V)
  • D = SN2 “D” version (with slanted dipoles)
  • R = Rückwärts (rearward-looking attachment)

In addition to this use for the FuG 220 Lichtenstein SN2, such nomenclature was used on aircraft with the FuG 218 Neptun VR, and FuG 240 Berlin N 1a. It is interesting that the FuG 240 Berlin N 1a used a lower case letter as a designation per official documents.

Hopefully some information can be presented here to add clarity to determining if such designations were used officially or not.

Best,

David
__________________
"He has all of the virtues I despise and none of the vices I admire." W.S.C.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10th December 2020, 15:35
jschreiber jschreiber is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 131
jschreiber is on a distinguished road
Re: Correct designation of Lichtenstein radar

Hello

Based on Fritz Trenkle books, here a summary of the Lichtenstein family
Not certified typo free !

Regards

Jean Schreiber
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10th December 2020, 16:46
Matolion Matolion is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 90
Matolion is on a distinguished road
Re: Correct designation of Lichtenstein radar

Roman numeral (IV, V, VI) = the frequency band in which the radar operated
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Correct designation for French engine Mikael Olrog Allied and Soviet Air Forces 6 16th September 2016 04:56
Correct designation of the Klemm aircraft Recceswind Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 0 1st October 2010 22:45
Avia B.35 / Av 135 correct designation? ianatheling Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 1 29th April 2010 15:08
SG220 for Lichtenstein SN-2 radar dufleuve Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 1 21st June 2006 19:54
Invention of Radar Klaus Schiffler The Second World War in General 3 31st January 2006 21:43


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:01.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net