|
Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: INformation concerning the Loss of Uffz. Johann Bauhuber - 31.12.1941
Hi Matti,
I guess an NVM outclasses the GQM for spelling of names, does the NVM indicate if these two were ethnic German, or allies serving in the Luftwaffe, Regards Brian Bines |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: INformation concerning the Loss of Uffz. Johann Bauhuber - 31.12.1941
In general, sorties designated as 'H' - Heimat basically refer to a non-combat flight as someone stated earlier - the literal translation of 'home' isn't applicable. It appears to apply to any training, courier, airfield orientation or other such type of flight where there was no expectation of contact with the enemy. On the other hand any standard patrol, escort or sortie where there existed potential for contact with the enemy might be expected were designated as 'F' - Feindflug. With the Schulen losses such flights where there may be contact with the enemy were designated as a flight type of 'E'. I haven't figured that one out yet. For general Schule flights there so no designation as far as the losses are concerned. It is, or can be, confusing.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: INformation concerning the Loss of Uffz. Johann Bauhuber - 31.12.1941
Thanks everyone who responded to my statements, and especially Brian who sent me a scan from his vast collection.
Looking at the document he works from, I can readily understand his problems but in this case I have to agree that NVM clerks probably were more careful than GQM with regard to spelling, but on the other hand, what do I know?... With regard to the Heimat flight I seem to be overruled by experience ( ) and accept that such flights not necessarily ment homeward bound trips. However since the crew were four pilots, I don't think it was an ordinary routine flight, but it feels better to fit into an resupply flight to bring back more frontline Bf's from some rear area depot. Thanks again Guys Cheers Stig |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: INformation concerning the Loss of Uffz. Johann Bauhuber - 31.12.1941
Stig, when I mentioned confusing? If you have any logbooks, note the different flight types - Platzflug, Sperrflug, Alarmstart, Kurierflug, etc. There's lots of them. And when there is a corresponding loss, Heimat or Feindflug as reported by the Gen.Qu. data, and trying to match that to the FB flight type? Some, such as Einsatz or Alarmstart are self-evident, but many of the others, Sheesh. I'm sure that there may be some here that know what all that means, but I'm not one of them.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Athens-Tatoi | Andy Mitchell | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 24 | 3rd May 2020 11:50 |
INformation Concerning the Loss of Uffz. Ludwig Heigl - 14.12.1944 | rickback4444 | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 1 | 1st December 2010 15:57 |
Information Concerning Loss of Uffz. Max Speck - 08.08.1943 | rickback4444 | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 6 | 22nd November 2010 22:06 |
Uffz Knopp loss JG53 | meunier | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 1 | 25th September 2006 13:50 |
Information regarding Johann Furst ZG1 | Andy F-P | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 0 | 2nd August 2005 08:01 |