Ju 52 from KGrzbV.105 (Kiel-Holtenau april 1940)

[Jagdkommando]

Hi like-minded,

Maybe someone could provide some information about a JU52 from KGrzbV.105 with the kennzeichen BA+KK.

I know its faith, but I'm after its Wrk.nr. and the variant of this plane.

Was it 3mG4e ??


Thanks in advance,

Jagdkomm.

[RT]

I know its faith

Nd what is it this fate ??

Remi

[G.R.Morrison]

It may be WNr.6736, based on BA+KG being WNr.6732, and BA+KM was WNr.6738.

I'm afraid I cannot help with variant.

Hope this helps, GRM

[RT]

Nd 6748 was CN+BW

,,,,???

Something wrong here


Rémi

[G.R.Morrison]

I have no disagreement that WNr.6748 of 12./TG 2, 4V+KS was CN+BW (rudder code: H 4 K) – at least in the summer of 1943.

I don’t claim to have discerned any logic to Ju 52 Stammkennzeichen. Indeed, Ju 52/3mg4e WNr.6739 of Kurierst. 4 is recorded as RF+NB (lost 4.Feb 1943)

And WNr.6742 of KGr.z.b.V. 800, 8T+KK, was CO+GM (crashed 25.March 1943 after running short of fuel).

I cannot explain the apparent discrepancies – I merely report on what we have assembled in the db.

Sorry I cannot throw more light on this, GRM

[Tony Jones]

Hi

The c/n range 6701-6800 was built by JFM from 9-12/39 so this range was not in a stkz block, as was later production

Tony

[RT]

STKZ new system start sometime around summer 39, are you sure that for the autumn production they do not use it ?? As shown by BA+KG being WNr.6732, and BA+KM was WNr.6738.

...


Rémi

[Tony Jones]

Remi

I have 6734 as NE+TJ and 6731 as BA+KI, 6739 as RF+NB so an stkz block does not work here

Regards

Tony

[ju55dk]

It started late 1939. In the BA+K row there are Do 17 and W 34 and so on.

Junker