Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22nd August 2011, 11:54
BABIN BABIN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Angers, West of France
Posts: 215
BABIN
To Vickers Wellesley’s experts : technical questions

Hello,

Please have a look on the attached picture :

-
What is the use of both antennas : the right antenna (probably radio) and the circular antenna ?

-
I think the containers hooked under the wings, are bombs containers, not gas tanks … could you confirm ? additional question : could the Wellesleys hook, under their wings, simultaneously, bombs containers and gas tanks ?

-
It seems the machine gun of the rear gunner is a double-barelled machine gun …. is it possible ?

-
It seems, too, that an additional machine gun is installed into the fuselage, just under the circular antenna … is it correct, or is it an optical illusion ?

-
What is the “prominence”, under the front part of the fuselage ?

-
Sometimes, three men were part of the crew of the Wellesleys … where was located the seat of the third man ?

And a no technical question : to which Middle East RAF unit was delivered the Wellesley K8525 ?

Many thanks in advance

Pierre
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22nd August 2011, 12:05
Juha's Avatar
Juha Juha is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,445
Juha is on a distinguished road
Re: To Vickers Wellesley’s experts : technical questions

Hello Babin
not being Wellesley specialist and I don't even have time to dig out my Wellesley material but some short comment
the circular antenna is a normal direction finding antenna

Yes Wellesley carried its bombs in underwinging panniers

Twin rear gun wasn't standard but IIRC at least during the East-Africa Campaign at least in one Wellesley sqn they upgunned their a/c, for ex installed the side gun, so a twin rear mount is entirely possible

Juha
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22nd August 2011, 13:13
dp_burke dp_burke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 608
dp_burke is on a distinguished road
Re: To Vickers Wellesley’s experts : technical questions

The detail under the DF antenae whihc you thought might be a gun is the window structure. There was a trangular window made up from the geodetic structure on each side of the fuselage.

Do a google image search for Vickers Wellesley and you will see it much clearer on photos and models.

Perhaps you can read French better than me:
http://www.airwar.ru/image/idop/bww2...ellesley-2.gif


A well finished model of a Wellesley
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=...%3Divns&itbs=1

I explect that the third seat is inside whre the windows are.
__________________
regards
Dennis Burke
Foreign Aircraft in Ireland 1939-1945
http://www.ww2irishaviation.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22nd August 2011, 14:10
Graham Boak Graham Boak is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 1,680
Graham Boak is on a distinguished road
Re: To Vickers Wellesley’s experts : technical questions

K8525 went to 47 Sq.

The item under the forward fuselage looks like an oil cooler, as seen on other types of this period.

It could not carry extra tanks under the wings - and didn't need to.

I believe you are right about the forward-firing machine gun, but can't confirm it at the moment.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22nd August 2011, 21:10
Bill Walker's Avatar
Bill Walker Bill Walker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 324
Bill Walker is on a distinguished road
Re: To Vickers Wellesley’s experts : technical questions

Just a minor addition: the vertical strut in front of the circular ADF antenna is actually a mast. The antenna it supports is a piece of wire coming out of the fuselage, to the top of the mast, and then back to the fixed vertical fin. The long length was needed because of the low frequency (and therefore long wavelength) of radios of that time.
__________________
Bill Walker
Canadian Military Aircraft Serials
www.rwrwalker.ca/index.htm
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23rd August 2011, 11:54
BABIN BABIN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Angers, West of France
Posts: 215
BABIN
Re: To Vickers Wellesley’s experts : technical questions

Thank you very much to Juha, Graham, Dennis and Bill.

Pierre
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Couple of Vickers Wellington questions rpeck350 Allied and Soviet Air Forces 0 31st July 2008 02:00


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 00:54.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net