|
The Second World War in General Please use this forum to discuss other World War Two related subjects not covered by the main categories. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
The Liberal View of the German Soldier
On 4 June 1940 Winston Churchill presented one of his famous speeches
to his Parliament and to the western world wherein he praises his armed forces and basically states that the success of the Wehrmacht in the battle for France (and Holland and Belgium) was based on superior numbers. This argument still is alive and well in the U.S. and the United Kingdom, and other countries. In this speech, which is published in the excellent book The Battle of France: Then and Now by Peter Cornwell, which anyone with an interest in the aspect of the air campaign should read, Churchill credits the success up to that point to the "Eight or nine armoured divisions, each of about 400 armoured vehicles of different kinds" and "the mechanised onslaught" of "a number of German divisions in lorries" and "behind them again there plodded the dull brute mass of the ordinary German Army and German people..." Churchill also credits the defense by the British Army of Boulogne and Calais of preventing the German Army from reaching Dunkirk before the British Expeditionary Force could be rescued and evacuated. Churchill claims that Calais was defended by 4000 British and 1000 French and that it took "four days of intense street fighting" for the German Army to take Calais. Churchill also claims that "At least two armoured divisions had to be sent to overcome them." The facts are much different than Churchill likes to portray them. The only division contronting the Allied forces in Calais was the 10th Panzer Division which was reinforced by the XIX corps artillery and the Stukas. The Panzer Brigade was prevented from taking part since the German higher commanders did not wish to sustain losses to their tank units which would be required to be used to advance on open terrain. The 10th PD had a Infantry Brigade of two rifle regiments (Schützen Regiment) and four rifle battalions were used in the assault with the assistance of the 90th recon battalion. The assault begain at day break on the 25th of May and was over at 1645 on 26 May. The 10th PD took a total of 13,000 prisoners. Also the halt order from Hitler is well known and this alone prevented Guderian from reaching Dunkirk and prevent the evacuation of over 330,000 troops. The German version of events if taken from the book Die Zehnte P.D.: Die Geschichte der 10. Panzer-Division by Albert Schick (1993). During the time I was in U.S. Army intelligence, I heard a NCO state his opinion that the ordinary German soldier lacked the necessary skills of initiative, knowledge, and drive that if the German officer commanding the unit were killed or otherwise incapacitated, the soldiers would not be capable of further action. This is the type of German soldier often portrayed by Hollywood and what unfortunately Hollywood portrays is often taken as fact and truth by even intelligent people. Many university professors also express such thoughts. When I attended the university, a professor of American Foreign Policy, stated that when German invaded the Soviet Union, the Germany Army was equipped with 35,000 tanks (!) (actually around 3500) and that this alone explained the rapid advance in 1941. The professor also claimed that Stalin tried to decline Lend-Lease aid except for aluminum. The University of Utah professors Ronald Smelser and Edward J. Davies II have written the book The Myth of the Eastern Front wherein they paint the picture that many Americans have been brainwashed by the Cold War when the only available view of the fighting on the Russian front came from apologists such as Heinz Guderian and Erich von Manstein and authors who wrote about such German servicemen and heroes such as Erich Hartmann and personal participants such as Otto Carius who they all tie to war crimes. The authors criticize those who admire and show a primary interest in the German armed forces (Wehrmacht) and call them gurus and romancers. These two authors seem to admire the Soviet armed forces (what do they label themselves?) and tend to denigrate the German soldiers. On page 24 of the book they describe "the picture of the Russian soldier that emerged was that of a patient, long-suffering, but also frequently a handsome, literate, innovative soldier who capable of great individual initiative." Then on page 14 the authors state that "Russian infantry also performed effectively whether working in formations or isolated and on their own." Then they make a comparison with the German soldiers who "floundered when cut off from their units just as they often struggled inadequatly when confronted with winter weather or difficult terrain." One popular author who also appeared as a guest on many documentaries was Stephen Ambrose, now deceased, who wrote several book and also made many fantastic claims which many have accepted as the gospel truth. On one occasion I heard him state that the Western Allies in Normandy were of equal numbers to the German forces and that in order to win the battle and campaign, the Allies had to "fight smarter." Ambrose liked to count all the soldiers in the German Army including support troops and only count Allied soldiers in actual combat units. Also he never mentioned the support of Allied airpower and the firepower provided by the various navies. Ambrose also liked to count the number of divisions in the German Wehrmacht and assumed all of then were at full strength. Again Niklas Zetterling provides some interesting statistics on the German military in his book Normandy 1944: German Military Organization, Combat Power and Organizational Effectiveness. Zetterling states that on 25 July 1944 the Allied armies in Normandy had a total of 1,452,00 soldiers facing about 380,000 German soldiers, a superiority of 3.8:1. The firepower was even greater. The Allies had 46 tanks for every 10 German tanks, a ration of 4.6:1. The history of the 12th SS Panzer Division consistently faced three British divisions until attrition forced them from the front line. Probably not even Rommel could have prevented a collapse. Ambrose once claimed that democracies produce better soldiers than do totalitarian governments. To him this alone explains the Allied victory. He makes this argument by producing false statistics. For example, he claims that the Americans in Bastogne during the Battle of the Bulge were outnumbered by a ratio of 10:1 but that the paratroopers prevailed against ten times their number. The actual ratio was 30,000 Germans against 20,000 Americans. The liberal establishment today continually tries to connect everyone in German military with war crimes as they try to do to the American serviceman in Iraq and Afghanistan. Years ago when several German soldiers were still living, including my uncle, I asked all of them if they were aware of war crimes being committed by their units in Russia. All of them stated they did not participate in war crimes or that they were even aware of war crimes committed by their fellow soldiers. This certainly is not evidence that their units did not commit violations of the laws of war, but the accusers certainly have not made their case that the German military was guilty as a whole of committing such crimes.
__________________
Sylvester Stadler Meine Ehre heisst Treue! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Quote:
Can we have the figures for 6 June 1944 and an explaination as to why the overwhelming German superiority was not decisive? It seems that number manipulation is not confined to your 'opponents'. It is just another 'we wuz outnumbered' excuse from one of the faithful. Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Well, I am not sure if the word liberal is used properly, but it is often used to describe a rather influential leftist ideology widespread in the West. It is a matter of fact, that those circles were either pro-Soviet or pro-communistic, and were instrumental in establishing several myths about Soviets. That said, the user, who is so ashamed of his name that is forced to use SS-man name as his cover, enters into the trap of German propaganda, which could be summarised that they were overwhelmed and not guilty. This is just ridiculous, but I am not sure if there is any sense in discussing this with the man.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Gentlemen please! The first post I find interesting and unusual. Even though you may disagree with the statements contained in it, surely they deserve a measured reply? I feel that the subject would benefit from the application of light, rather than heat. That way we lesser-informed mortals (and I am in that class) can learn. Thank you.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
There is no purpose in discussing anything with an anonymous nazi supporter, as this will lead only to spread nazi propaganda.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Quote:
Since you don't take me seriously, perhaps you won't even read this, but for other more interested serious persons here is the information re: 6 June in Normandy: Allies: Six divisions plus the three airborne divisions; 156,000 men were landed. I don't have statistics re: the number of tanks on the Allied side. Germans: 352 Infantry Division (12,734 men) 716 Security Division (Infantry) (7,771) 711 SD (7,242) 709 SD (12,320) Reserve: 21 PD (16,297) 12 SS PD (20,516) Total German: 76,880 men plus corps and HQ. The security divisions were static and did not have the firepower of regular infantry divisions. The two reserve armored divisions were released late and only the 21 PD engaged in combat with part of the division. So where is this German superiority in numbers on D-Day? BTW, I don't take anyone seriously who does not do his own research. To Franek G: I don't know why you enter discussions to which you have nothing to contribute.
__________________
Sylvester Stadler Meine Ehre heisst Treue! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Quote:
Quote:
Who outnumbered who? Quote:
You clearly (because of your excuse loaded opening post) belong to the group of people who believe 'you' lost only because everyone else ganged up on you....for no good reason either! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Plenty actually, but what for if you have no balls to use your own name.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Quote:
Discuss if you wish by reason, not by insult...
__________________
Ruy Horta 12 O'Clock High! And now I see with eye serene The very pulse of the machine; A being breathing thoughtful breath, A traveller between life and death; |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Quote:
Quote:
Based on the motorized forces and upfront supplies available, are you sure that if Hitler countermanded this halt order it would change the outcome? Quote:
Nationalism and xenophobia are pervasive worldwide, so what is your point? Quote:
The Hollywood portrayal of German soldiers is no less accurate than the highly-cliched characters portrayed in German-made films like STALINGRAD. The political correctness and unlikely situations put in the script were not very convincing. Thanks to novelists like Karl May, Luftwaffe pilots were more fascinated (some say obsessed) with American Western films than were American pilots. Today, not many Germans are aware of this and their ignorance makes me smile whenever I read about references to Cowboys and the Wild West in news reports from Germany. Achtung Indianer! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
looking for a german soldier | Von Alles | The Second World War in General | 2 | 1st February 2008 19:29 |
60 years after German KL Auchwitz-Birkenau | Mirek Wawrzynski | The Second World War in General | 10 | 7th January 2008 15:20 |
My library - you rate it! | generalderpanzertruppen | Books and Magazines | 8 | 24th November 2007 02:36 |
Foundation for German communication and related technologies | rob van den nieuwendijk | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 3 | 4th May 2007 23:57 |
Kaczmarek - a German view of the air war | FalkeEins | Links | 2 | 4th December 2006 18:27 |