|
Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Any dispute about interpreting the BofB?
I think the actual quote was "peace for our time" if we're being picky.
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any dispute about interpreting the BofB?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Kurfürst! - The Messerschmitt Bf 109 Performance Resource Site http://www.kurfurst.org/ |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Any dispute about interpreting the BofB?
Quote:
Quote:
From memory, RAF night fighters practically doubled their kills each month through the Blitz months of 1941. |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Any dispute about interpreting the BofB?
I don’t know the Kurfürst's source but both Morgan’s & Shacklady’s Spitfire. The History and Price’s The Spitfire Story show that Supermarine’s F.37/34 design had elliptic wings very early on when it still had only 4 mgs in its wings. For ex Price shows drawing based on Jan 1935 stage with elliptic wings and 4 mgs.
Juha Last edited by Juha; 1st October 2010 at 09:54. Reason: Correct a typo |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any dispute about interpreting the BofB?
Quote:
Quote:
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any dispute about interpreting the BofB?
Quote:
The March 1933 specification of the RLM - which ultimately lead to the 109 - specified either -a single, very powerful but heavy 2cm MG C/30 Motorkanone - two engine cowl-mounted 7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 17 machine guns, or - one lightweight, engine-mounted 2c MG FF cannon with two 7.92 mm MG 17s. Regardless, the competing German firms seems to have been putting with a twin cowl MG at the start (which was pretty much standard for the biplanes they replaced anyway), but the idea for heavier armament was there, from the start, and the technical aspects of the planes clearly anticipated such (see use of side mounted superchargers of the engines - this made engine mounted guns possible). The British AM's revision for specs for gun armement (8-gun batteries) came in April 1935.The French were also adopting engine mounted cannons for the fighters at about the same time, and the Soviets were absolute pioneers of cannon armament on their I-16s AFAIK. Quote:
The first Spits came into service August 1938, but production was so slow they couldn't even muster a full Squadron until the end of the year, when the cannon armed 109E production started. The Emil then very rapidly started to equip units - I believe a large number of airframes were already produced, they were waiting for the Daimler-Benz engines to arrive. The Jumo powered 109D, that was the sole type employed in September 1938 (780 or so in service) was rapidly replaced by Emils by the start of the war; in July 1939, there were already some 500 Emils (and 50 of the old Doras) in service, and this roughly doubled by the end of September 1939, with some 90% of the 1125 available day fighters being the most recent type (see: http://ww2.dk/oob/statistics/se30939.htm). In short, effectively (meaning: in meaningful numbers) cannon armed 109s and eight gun Hurricanes/Spitfires came into service at about the same time. Quote:
As for the E-1, it seems to have been produced parallel and with roughly the same production ratio as the cannon E-3 until early 1940, and made up about 35-40% of the force during BoB. I've always wondered why this was so; there's an early war propaganda picture showing two 109Es in flight, and the leader is flying a cannon E-3 while the wingman an all-MG E-1. I was wondering if there was some tactical doctrine behind it, stipulating that the leader responsible for the attack will be flying a heavier armed aircraft, with armament suitable against bombers, while a wingman with an armament more suitable against fighters will be protecting him..? It should be noted that it was an exception for a fighter to be armored until mid-1940, so MG armament would be still effective. IMHO it would worth looking at if JGs were equipped in such fashion, with an equal mix of E-1s and E-3s.
__________________
Kurfürst! - The Messerschmitt Bf 109 Performance Resource Site http://www.kurfurst.org/ |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Any dispute about interpreting the BofB?
Quote:
Leading pilots just picked up the newer and better crates, the wing men and newbies were assigned what was left, more often than not the hand me downs. However there was a concept of light and heavy fighters (no, the latter not being the Zerstoerer). The E-5 was originally planned (iirc) as the light fighter next to the E-4. All from memory, so shoot me down in flames if I am contrary to spec. BTW I agree that the RAF was running behind with its all LMG armament, not in the forefront. Ruy
__________________
Ruy Horta 12 O'Clock High! And now I see with eye serene The very pulse of the machine; A being breathing thoughtful breath, A traveller between life and death; |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Any dispute about interpreting the BofB?
Hello
Fighter Command had 1 Sept 39 1’099 a/c of which 747 in first line units (incl. 347 Hurricanes and 187 Spitfires). RAF had received 497 Hurricanes by that date, I haven’t number for Spits instantly at hand. Juha |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Any dispute about interpreting the BofB?
Some numbers from Robertson's book "Spitfire - The Story of a Famous Fighter".
RAF had 400 Spitfires "in service" in September 1939, from page 22. Maybe this means "delivered"? Also from this book, the first order of aircraft were all delivered by August 1939. That would be K9787 to L1096, 310 aircraft. The next batch of 200, N3023 and on, started delivery on 9 August 1939. So, roughly 300 to 400 delivered by 1 September 1939. |
#50
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Any dispute about interpreting the BofB?
Hello Bill
Thanks for the info! Juha |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any ex-LW adviser for 1969 BofB film? | tcolvin | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 19 | 9th September 2010 13:29 |
Finding 152 Squadron families BofB | Danny152 | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 2 | 24th March 2010 21:59 |
Help Interpreting Mission Report | aldodog | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 7 | 28th May 2009 16:09 |
235 Sqn - BofB crews | andy bird | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 1 | 10th March 2006 12:33 |