|
Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Erich Hartmann vs. P-51
Quote:
Best, Kenneth |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Erich Hartmann vs. P-51
quote=FalkeEins;85562]Khazanov doesn't go into the sort of detail you've attempted. I've translated parts of his piece...& the response from Lorant/Ring, which includes detailed quotes from Khazanov's article - therefore the following might be of some interest to you. Ring states that these illustrations "serve to expose the superficial nature of Khazanov's assertions and confirm that his only goal in compiling his article was to discredit Hartmann and his record ...."
[/quote] For sure Khazanov's article is too poor to prove Hartmann's overclaiming. However, there remain lots of questions. I have already posted some times ago the example of unsubstantiated victories against Aircobras, claimed by Hartmann. They were well confirmed by authorities, though having no background from the opposite side. Most of the remarks of Lorant/Ring in point of fact criticise mistakes in Hartmann's victory list, that Khazanov based on while writing the article. Eventually, it is not Khazanov's problem that western researchers can not fix the reliable list of Hartmann's claims throughout more than 60 years. From my experience I can say that those obscure "Lagg" hamper identification signifficantly. Another point here, I know that many members of this board believe that any overstatement in German claims are absolutely impossible and if Soviet records contradict this in some cases, then those records are pure fake. In this case rather rhetorical question emerges, taking TW claims lists and comparing them with Soviet documents, why claims by Barkhorn, Rall, Krupinski, Beisswenger, Wolf, Wolfrum, Schack, Brendel, Lipfert and many others coinside with Soviet records with little exeptions, and those made by Hartmann, Batz, Rudorffer, Lang, Nowotny, Philipp in many cases are missing. I suppose here a malicious campaign against this Luftwaffe pilots Soviet authorities deliberately hide info on the planes shot down by those personalities... |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Erich Hartmann vs. P-51
I do not know about others, but I would be most interested to read a detailed break down of victories of German top aces. Personally, I would love to see Weber and Setz as well. That said, it is all in hands of Russian researchers.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Erich Hartmann vs. P-51
Based on my research and experience, one of the main errors done by many aviation historians - from all sides! - who try to match a certain airman's victory lists with losses from the opposing side, is to look only for crashed or force landed (thus destroyed or severely damaged) aircraft. This is incomplete research. Aircraft damaged in air combat, but returned to friendly territory should also be considered.
Another frequently done error is to discount the ground fire (flak, small arms fire, etc.), which caused a similar number of losses than by fighters and board gunners. However, the feats of the anti-aircraft artillery is usually poorly covered. All these often overviewed factors should also be counted, for the overall picture to be clearer (it will never be 100% clear anyhow).
__________________
Dénes |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Erich Hartmann vs. P-51
Denes,
Quote:
This last gradation can not surely be an air victory of any German pilot that claim it. Quote:
The comparison between losses to flak and to fighters for Soviet side, shows that the latter prevails, at least with regards to fighter planes losses. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Erich Hartmann vs. P-51
If an aircraft was damaged in air combat, but could be later on repaired, at least gives an indication that an air combat did take place and hits were scored, so the opposite side's claim was not made up. In my point of view, at least.
This, again, should be valid for claims of all sides, not only German.
__________________
Dénes |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Erich Hartmann vs. P-51
No historian has authority to change officially authorised scores, he may only establish it, if it is unknown. Historian is supposed to find out what actually happened, so he should consider even undamaged aircraft. For example if Mr X claimed a victory, following replies should be considered satisfactory: at the time and place following aircraft were lost, at the time and place following aircraft were lost but they are attributed to ground fire, at the time and place following aircraft were damaged, at the time and place fought unit Z and suffered no losses, enemy cannot be established.
Now, over to you, I am looking forward for an article or a book about top German aces of the Eastern Front. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Erich Hartmann vs. P-51
about Mr. Bernad second point, the aaa. thats indeed very important.
in my researches about kursk there seems to develope following conclusion. if to compare german fighter claims with soviet losses you will come to bergstroms conlusion of 1:1,25 up to 1:1,33 overclaiming (kursk, p. 118). but if you resarch the (strong) german aaa, you will have an rate of 1:3 overclaiming. btw if you look at the soviet side, this rate is much higher - around 1:8 exaggeration. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Erich Hartmann vs. P-51
About Kursk, it must be said that Bergstrom's figures for German losses are too low. Taking the losses one by one, you already get more airplanes destroyed than he did, and yet these figures are not complete. I greatly appreciate Christer Bergstrom's work, but in this case it's not perfect.
The Soviet overclaim rate was undoubtedly higher than that of the Germans' at the time, but the difference is less than what could be deduced from his numbers (I'd say the Soviet overclaimed 5-6 : 1 for the Kursk battle). Generally speaking, I may be mistaken, but the impression I get from reading a lot about these issues is that the side which is tactically on the defensive is usuallly less accurate in claims. This is also true when many units are involved at the same time. Last edited by kolya1; 13th May 2009 at 15:19. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Erich Hartmann vs. P-51
I'd like to thank all of you for your info in this thread.
Joe Harper was my grandfather, and he died when I was still a baby. While I have his medals, etc., I never got to learn this stuff from him. I'll be doing more research about all of this, and will share anything I find. It's strange to learn that Hartmann was the one who shot him down. I've long been a WWII fighter plane buff, and am currently working on a young adult novel set in 1945 Germany (I write kids' books for a living, though this one is an extracurricular book), so this sort of stuff was on my mind. Thanks again to everyone who provided info! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
German overclaims in the East. Hartmann and others... | Nikita Egorov | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 232 | 31st January 2020 03:21 |
Luftwaffe shared victories (was: Hartmann ....352 victories or 80?) | Vinman | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 48 | 22nd April 2007 06:49 |
Hauptmann Erich Hohagen | Leo Etgen | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 3 | 29th September 2005 06:42 |
Hartmann versus P-51s | Monaco | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 0 | 10th May 2005 17:45 |
Erich Hartmann: 352 victories or... 80? | Dénes Bernád | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 67 | 4th May 2005 19:04 |