|
Books and Magazines Please use this forum to review or discuss books and magazines. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Could the Luftwaffe do SEELÖWE in July 1940
Hi, just read an alternative history novel, Seelöwe, the landing in England on the 21st of July 1940. Lots of senseful information on the planning and surprise landing in July which ist primarily an Luftwaffe op.
There is an Ebook at: https://www.amazon.de/dp/B01N7LIVT9 and also a paperback version. Reminds me a bit of Tom Clancys Red Storm Rising, comparable style. I think it falls a bit short, regarding the logistical situation of the Luftwaffe in June and July in France. Would it really have been possible for the Wehrmacht to do this stunt? What do you think? Regretfully only in german language, though I hope an english version will follow. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Could the Luftwaffe do SEELÖWE in July 1940
I think it falls a bit short, regarding the logistical situation of the Luftwaffe in June and July in France. Would it really have been possible for the Wehrmacht to do this stunt?From my reading of the deciphered signal traffic for the period (which is a far from complete picture of course) the Luftwaffe was far too busy restoring communications, supplies and serviceability on a mass of new and unfamiliar bases to do more than it actually did in the immediate aftermath of the French capitulation. Also the Kriegsmarine was just about nowhere with assembling the necessary shipping (see the monthly War Diaries of the German Naval Staff Operations Division: https://archive.org/search.php?query...Sorter&page=2). Then the Army had to train troops for amphibious ops — so there were a lot of obstacles for the Wehrmacht to overcome. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Could the Luftwaffe do SEELÖWE in July 1940
[quote=Nick Beale;228266]
Quote:
Right, but the authors basic strategy is a landing by paras and Ju 52 transported troops on a small perimeter near Folkestone, after the navy is decimated by a fake landing attempt in the nortsea. Thereby the Luftwaffe, supported by Me 109s with extended range with drop tanks, will be able to reach local air superiority. The use of the Luftwaffe is tactical and not as in the real battle strategical with bombing the quite irrelevant London. The historical strategy of SEALION with a broad landing with insufficient naval ressources would have been impossible to support as you rightly point out! There is a lot of thought on the actual planning en datail in the book, that seems to be written by someone who knew a real lot of historical and technical details. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Could the Luftwaffe do SEELÖWE in July 1940
Well, this is not the classic sealion approach for a landing on a broad front with an insufficient navy and tranport capacity.
His idea is a para landing supported by Ju 52 transported infantry on a small perimeter near Folkestone. The Luftwaffes job is to reach air superiority over this small area. Then the RN is lured into the northsea by a fake invasion fleet and decimated like in Crete 41. After that it becomes easier to support and enlarge the first perimeter. The story gives a lot of insights into the thinking process of the german staff. Hope 2nd part comes soon. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Could the Luftwaffe do SEELÖWE in July 1940
Quote:
The RN already had a fleet situated at Scapa Flow in case of any attempt to cross the North Sea without stripping the south coast bases of their ships/MGB's, and not forgetting the Allied submarines in position to intercept such a force.
__________________
Collecting Interests: WW2 German Award Citations, Wehrpasse & Soldbucher. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Could the Luftwaffe do SEELÖWE in July 1940
Decimating the RN:
The concept rests on the assumption, that the RN could not ignore a invasion fleet of about 50 larger freighters coming out of the Kattegatt (which ist an information given by an intelligence deception operation to the english). Then, give them a treatment of horizontal bombardments to disperse the ships and make them spend ammo, give them a treatment of torpedo bombers supported by Me 110 for flak reduction, then again horizintal bombers, plus stukas etc., all of that in nice Me 109 range and cover, and then some U Boats in deep water on the return trip to scapa. Nice plot! |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Could the Luftwaffe do SEELÖWE in July 1940
What torpedo bombers? He 115?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Could the Luftwaffe do SEELÖWE in July 1940
Quote:
And not forgetting that those German ships would have to get through a screen of Allied submarines before even getting close to the operational area. From the beginning of April to the end of June 1940 Allied submarines hit over 50 ships - all in the North Sea area - so were a potent force. A force that large would have to exit through the German minefields and the size of those exits wouldn't allow a force of that size to transit in formation and not forgetting trying to get through the British laid minefields. Quote:
And not forgetting that in daylight warships when not tied to escort work and in plenty of sea room are hard to hit when allowed to alter course and speed. And not forgetting that the RAF weren't the only British force with aircraft. They might of been outdated but a force of Fleet Air Arm aircraft from Aircraft Carriers would of been able to put the bombers off their aim as well as strike against the German decoy fleet. That is assuming that the RAF wouldn't of been able to put up a squadron or two but the chances are that they would of done.
__________________
Collecting Interests: WW2 German Award Citations, Wehrpasse & Soldbucher. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Could the Luftwaffe do SEELÖWE in July 1940
Horizontal bombardment means bombardment by horizontal bombers like He 110 or Do 17 ezc, that were available in large numbers. The aim ist to disperse the ships so that they cannot support each other mutually by their AA guns, which were at this time rather decrepit. For comparison, Renown class had at the time three octuple (cumbersome) 2 pounder mounts) and 4 (albeit ineffective) quadruple 0.5 inch MG. So singling the ships out to destroy them piecemeal ist sound tactics.
There is no discussion about the quality of RN Captains, because in this scenario the few german big ships have explicit orders to retreat like cowards to encourage the RN to follow. Furthermore, the distance from scapa to an area off Jutland is about 600 km one way. You cannot do all of this by night, especially when the fake invasion fleet bids its timing to appear on daylight. And, and this is a big and, the german laid the ambush in this scenario and RN and RAF must react and cannot be comparably prepared. Especially RAF fighters were mainly dislocated in No 11 grop in the south. RN U Boats where a menace, but had the same problems as the german U Boats, that most of the north sea is rather shallow, not a good place for an U boat tom get caught. In this scenario the fake invasion transports are filled with empty barrels to enhance their survival. Makes them hard to sink. And using RN Carrieres with Shagbats against Me 109 does not sound like a particularly sound idea! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
British Second-Line Aircraft lost in France Sept. 1939 - June 1940. | Martin Gleeson | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 23 | 23rd March 2020 21:36 |
July 1940 Luftwaffe losses | Brian | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 8 | 17th October 2013 22:09 |
Luftwaffe loss July 1940 | Brian | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 1 | 24th June 2012 11:38 |
Luftwaffe losses early July 1940 | Brian | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 3 | 9th October 2010 00:24 |
238 Squadron pilot in the sea 1940 | Jon | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 26 | 24th July 2005 13:10 |