|
The Second World War in General Please use this forum to discuss other World War Two related subjects not covered by the main categories. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
The Liberal View of the German Soldier
On 4 June 1940 Winston Churchill presented one of his famous speeches
to his Parliament and to the western world wherein he praises his armed forces and basically states that the success of the Wehrmacht in the battle for France (and Holland and Belgium) was based on superior numbers. This argument still is alive and well in the U.S. and the United Kingdom, and other countries. In this speech, which is published in the excellent book The Battle of France: Then and Now by Peter Cornwell, which anyone with an interest in the aspect of the air campaign should read, Churchill credits the success up to that point to the "Eight or nine armoured divisions, each of about 400 armoured vehicles of different kinds" and "the mechanised onslaught" of "a number of German divisions in lorries" and "behind them again there plodded the dull brute mass of the ordinary German Army and German people..." Churchill also credits the defense by the British Army of Boulogne and Calais of preventing the German Army from reaching Dunkirk before the British Expeditionary Force could be rescued and evacuated. Churchill claims that Calais was defended by 4000 British and 1000 French and that it took "four days of intense street fighting" for the German Army to take Calais. Churchill also claims that "At least two armoured divisions had to be sent to overcome them." The facts are much different than Churchill likes to portray them. The only division contronting the Allied forces in Calais was the 10th Panzer Division which was reinforced by the XIX corps artillery and the Stukas. The Panzer Brigade was prevented from taking part since the German higher commanders did not wish to sustain losses to their tank units which would be required to be used to advance on open terrain. The 10th PD had a Infantry Brigade of two rifle regiments (Schützen Regiment) and four rifle battalions were used in the assault with the assistance of the 90th recon battalion. The assault begain at day break on the 25th of May and was over at 1645 on 26 May. The 10th PD took a total of 13,000 prisoners. Also the halt order from Hitler is well known and this alone prevented Guderian from reaching Dunkirk and prevent the evacuation of over 330,000 troops. The German version of events if taken from the book Die Zehnte P.D.: Die Geschichte der 10. Panzer-Division by Albert Schick (1993). During the time I was in U.S. Army intelligence, I heard a NCO state his opinion that the ordinary German soldier lacked the necessary skills of initiative, knowledge, and drive that if the German officer commanding the unit were killed or otherwise incapacitated, the soldiers would not be capable of further action. This is the type of German soldier often portrayed by Hollywood and what unfortunately Hollywood portrays is often taken as fact and truth by even intelligent people. Many university professors also express such thoughts. When I attended the university, a professor of American Foreign Policy, stated that when German invaded the Soviet Union, the Germany Army was equipped with 35,000 tanks (!) (actually around 3500) and that this alone explained the rapid advance in 1941. The professor also claimed that Stalin tried to decline Lend-Lease aid except for aluminum. The University of Utah professors Ronald Smelser and Edward J. Davies II have written the book The Myth of the Eastern Front wherein they paint the picture that many Americans have been brainwashed by the Cold War when the only available view of the fighting on the Russian front came from apologists such as Heinz Guderian and Erich von Manstein and authors who wrote about such German servicemen and heroes such as Erich Hartmann and personal participants such as Otto Carius who they all tie to war crimes. The authors criticize those who admire and show a primary interest in the German armed forces (Wehrmacht) and call them gurus and romancers. These two authors seem to admire the Soviet armed forces (what do they label themselves?) and tend to denigrate the German soldiers. On page 24 of the book they describe "the picture of the Russian soldier that emerged was that of a patient, long-suffering, but also frequently a handsome, literate, innovative soldier who capable of great individual initiative." Then on page 14 the authors state that "Russian infantry also performed effectively whether working in formations or isolated and on their own." Then they make a comparison with the German soldiers who "floundered when cut off from their units just as they often struggled inadequatly when confronted with winter weather or difficult terrain." One popular author who also appeared as a guest on many documentaries was Stephen Ambrose, now deceased, who wrote several book and also made many fantastic claims which many have accepted as the gospel truth. On one occasion I heard him state that the Western Allies in Normandy were of equal numbers to the German forces and that in order to win the battle and campaign, the Allies had to "fight smarter." Ambrose liked to count all the soldiers in the German Army including support troops and only count Allied soldiers in actual combat units. Also he never mentioned the support of Allied airpower and the firepower provided by the various navies. Ambrose also liked to count the number of divisions in the German Wehrmacht and assumed all of then were at full strength. Again Niklas Zetterling provides some interesting statistics on the German military in his book Normandy 1944: German Military Organization, Combat Power and Organizational Effectiveness. Zetterling states that on 25 July 1944 the Allied armies in Normandy had a total of 1,452,00 soldiers facing about 380,000 German soldiers, a superiority of 3.8:1. The firepower was even greater. The Allies had 46 tanks for every 10 German tanks, a ration of 4.6:1. The history of the 12th SS Panzer Division consistently faced three British divisions until attrition forced them from the front line. Probably not even Rommel could have prevented a collapse. Ambrose once claimed that democracies produce better soldiers than do totalitarian governments. To him this alone explains the Allied victory. He makes this argument by producing false statistics. For example, he claims that the Americans in Bastogne during the Battle of the Bulge were outnumbered by a ratio of 10:1 but that the paratroopers prevailed against ten times their number. The actual ratio was 30,000 Germans against 20,000 Americans. The liberal establishment today continually tries to connect everyone in German military with war crimes as they try to do to the American serviceman in Iraq and Afghanistan. Years ago when several German soldiers were still living, including my uncle, I asked all of them if they were aware of war crimes being committed by their units in Russia. All of them stated they did not participate in war crimes or that they were even aware of war crimes committed by their fellow soldiers. This certainly is not evidence that their units did not commit violations of the laws of war, but the accusers certainly have not made their case that the German military was guilty as a whole of committing such crimes.
__________________
Sylvester Stadler Meine Ehre heisst Treue! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Quote:
Can we have the figures for 6 June 1944 and an explaination as to why the overwhelming German superiority was not decisive? It seems that number manipulation is not confined to your 'opponents'. It is just another 'we wuz outnumbered' excuse from one of the faithful. Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Well, I am not sure if the word liberal is used properly, but it is often used to describe a rather influential leftist ideology widespread in the West. It is a matter of fact, that those circles were either pro-Soviet or pro-communistic, and were instrumental in establishing several myths about Soviets. That said, the user, who is so ashamed of his name that is forced to use SS-man name as his cover, enters into the trap of German propaganda, which could be summarised that they were overwhelmed and not guilty. This is just ridiculous, but I am not sure if there is any sense in discussing this with the man.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Gentlemen please! The first post I find interesting and unusual. Even though you may disagree with the statements contained in it, surely they deserve a measured reply? I feel that the subject would benefit from the application of light, rather than heat. That way we lesser-informed mortals (and I am in that class) can learn. Thank you.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Quote:
Discuss if you wish by reason, not by insult...
__________________
Ruy Horta 12 O'Clock High! And now I see with eye serene The very pulse of the machine; A being breathing thoughtful breath, A traveller between life and death; |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
This first part may be somewhat tangential.What books or other sources discuss Luftwaffe pilots, their interest in American Western movies, and the use of the term Indianer?
On the main point of the thread. Liberal may not be the best descriptor of the point I think is trying to be raised. Perhaps “the popular view in English speaking nations of the German soldier” might more accurate. I have read a number of Stephen Ambrose's books and did not come away with the impression that the average German soldier was not a fine soldier. There is a book that consciously makes the comparison. I have not read the book, but it is telling that the blurb for the book talks about the myth of German army superiority.When the Odds Were Even: The Vosges Mountains Campaign, October 1944-January 1945 (Presidio, 1994) by Keith Bonn (based on his PhD thesis in International History at the University of Chicago) considers the relative effectiveness of German and US infantry. U Chicago is a first rate university and Bonn’s background makes him very well qualified: “An infantry officer with extensive tactical experience in various command and staff positions in airborne, infantry, light infantry and joint units in Korea, Central America, and the continental United States. A ranger and master parachutist, he earned a B.S. from the United States Military Academy at West Point (USMA) with a concentration in the German language, an M.A. from the University of Chicago in European history, and a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago in International history. His doctoral dissertation became the basis for his first book,When the Odds Were Even: The Vosges Mountains Campaign, October 1944-January 1945 (Presidio, 1994). He authored the 48th, 49th, and 50th editions ofThe Army Officer's Guide (Stackpole Books, 1999, 2002, and 2005). With Master Sergeant Tony Baker, Bonn co-authoredA Guide to Military Operations Other Than War (Stackpole Books, 2000). Bonn taught various core and upper-division elective courses in history during a three-year assignment to the Department of History at USMA.” Here is a review of the book: http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/a...krev/bonn.html Steve |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Quote:
One important thing, I believe. Here you are bio notes of figures involved in concentration camp system. It is in Polish, but this is not important. Note birth dates of those men and women, those were people mostly grown in Kaiser period, and only few may be called as being under influence of Nazi propaganda. http://www.majdanek.com.pl/biogramy/a.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
Quote:
A great many Finnish journalists that now occupy key positions in the media are products of the so called "Tampere school", thoroughly indoctrinated by professor Pertti Hemanus, a stalinist in truest sense.
__________________
"No man, no problem." Josef Stalin possibly said...:-) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Liberal View of the German Soldier
A most interesting observation. There is currently on TV a short series called "The Lost World of Communism". The first program was about East Germany and the second Czechoslovakia. The majority of people in those countries rejoiced at the fall of communism but some regretted the ending of an era. It is thought that it will take another two generations to erase the memory of those times.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
looking for a german soldier | Von Alles | The Second World War in General | 2 | 1st February 2008 20:29 |
60 years after German KL Auchwitz-Birkenau | Mirek Wawrzynski | The Second World War in General | 10 | 7th January 2008 16:20 |
My library - you rate it! | generalderpanzertruppen | Books and Magazines | 8 | 24th November 2007 03:36 |
Foundation for German communication and related technologies | rob van den nieuwendijk | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 3 | 5th May 2007 00:57 |
Kaczmarek - a German view of the air war | FalkeEins | Links | 2 | 4th December 2006 19:27 |