Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26  
Old 23rd September 2007, 20:51
Richard T. Eger Richard T. Eger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seaford, DE, U.S.A.
Posts: 626
Richard T. Eger is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: The great camouflage & markings debate

Dear Christian, Michael, and Franek,

Thank you for your added comments. I have finally heard from Ken Merrick. Ken sent me what I would call a "white paper" on the subject and I've asked his permission to share it in this thread.

In summary, Ken's latest approach has been to mix paints per the original RLM specifications as opposed to attempting to color match against old paint chips or paint on remnants of recovered aircraft, the approach which has pretty much been institutionalized until now. His argument is that paint fades and if a part has been excavated it could have been subject to chemical attack. Even museum aircrafts' paint will fade with time.

On the opposite side of the fence, adhering to the old approach, is Michael Ullmann, who has brought up the idea that the different aircraft manufacturers ended up with somewhat different shades for the same RLM numbered paint. I have his 2002 book on order, so can't comment much further on this until I have it in hand.

I can say that, despite the best of intents, paint manufacturer's quite likely were forced to use whatever base materials they could get their hands on, materials that could have affected the final color produced. If true, this could support Michael's thinking.

In a phone conversation with Manfred Boehme this morning, he noted that when it came to the official RLM specification for the camouflage pattern, he has never seen a photo of an Me 262 that had camouflage that adhered to the official pattern for the type. I would assume that this comment might be applicable to the Me 163, as well.

As for being extremely careful in noting the existing original paint and pattern, unfortunately some sections of the aircraft arrived in the U.S. without paint. For instance, there is no paint on the rear fuselage. Hopefully, someone has notes or photos of what it looked like before it was removed.

Thus, we will still be interested in seeing exactly how the AWM Me 163 B was patterned prior to repainting to act as a guide for the aircraft now at Legend Flyers.

Regards,
Richard
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NEW BOOK - Fw 190 D Camouflage & Markings - Pt. 1 David E. Brown Focke-Wulf Fw 190D Camouflage & Markings 71 31st March 2014 00:16
Luftwaffe Camouflage and Markings Errata and Addenda - Update 30/5/06 Chevron Publishing Luftwaffe Camouflage and Markings 1933-1945 0 30th May 2006 12:01
ANR Camouflage & Markings new book: errata corrige veltro Books and Magazines 2 27th August 2005 20:50
Camouflage and markings of the ARN jad Books and Magazines 0 16th March 2005 01:07
Camouflage and Markings of the ANR Ruy Horta Books and Magazines 4 10th February 2005 21:06


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:52.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net