Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 29th August 2017, 10:19
CJE's Avatar
CJE CJE is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bordeaux (France)
Posts: 1,409
CJE
X and Y-Verfahren

Hello,

When did pathfinder operations with X or Y-Verfahren stop?

Thanks in advance.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29th August 2017, 15:57
Marcel Hogenhuis's Avatar
Marcel Hogenhuis Marcel Hogenhuis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Venlo - the Netherlands
Posts: 799
Marcel Hogenhuis will become famous soon enough
Re: X and Y-Verfahren

Hello Chris

The easiest answer: soon after the British were able to 'bend' the beams by the end of 1940 (I must check Most Secret War of prof. R.V. Jones and some other publications to be more precise). I faintly remember that parts of KG 26 were involved in using the X-Verfahren.

The Y-Verfahren was not abandoned, this technique was used later to plot the position of (own) Luftwaffe-fighters and nightfighters.

Best regards, Marcel
__________________
airfield Venlo in WW-2, I./NJG 1, He219-project
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30th August 2017, 12:19
CJE's Avatar
CJE CJE is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bordeaux (France)
Posts: 1,409
CJE
Re: X and Y-Verfahren

Thanks.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30th August 2017, 13:19
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is online now
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 5,795
Nick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura about
Re: X and Y-Verfahren

I'm not sure any of the techniques was completely abandoned. Prisoner interrogations suggest that Knickebein stations were still transmitting during the May 1944 raid on Bristol, for example.
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30th August 2017, 15:01
sirbob sirbob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Forest, UK
Posts: 172
sirbob is on a distinguished road
Re: X and Y-Verfahren

The use of X and Y-Verfahren was indeed severely blunted over England in early 1941, but their limited use continued until 1944. Each side sought advantage in adjustments, variations, bluff, traps and prediction in a battle of electronic measure and counter-measure similar to Bomber Command's offensive over Germany.
And don't forget the eastern front. I have no knowledge of the electronic air war over there but I do have several photos of He 111's in Russia fitted with X or Y Gerät aerials.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30th August 2017, 15:29
edNorth edNorth is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,126
edNorth is on a distinguished road
Re: X and Y-Verfahren

FYI, Photos show X/Y antennas on He 111s etc. But Ju 88 A-4 (as much used in Britains bombing up to 1944) had their antennas "intregal" (recieving antenna was external under rear fuselage!): the FuBI antenna, only having special amplifiier to they Lorenz apparatus internally.
Not that is specificly belongs here, just curiously, I discovered by resarching "mysterious" antenna on a very famous bird. Period is spring 1943, so was USAAF also using beams
http://scout.com/military/warrior/Ar...elle-101458766

-Ed
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30th August 2017, 16:54
Brian Bines Brian Bines is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,378
Brian Bines is on a distinguished road
Re: X and Y-Verfahren

According to an RAF report for February 1944 'Benito' (Y) had been transmitted during the recent London raids but no Luftwaffe aircraft were found to carry the equipment to operate with these beams . The operation of these beams were not normal as the communication needed for ranging and bomb dropping were more limited than normal when Benito was actually being used .
From memory I believe another report believed the transmission of these beams were intended to cover the use of more sophisticated systems .
As Nick states interrogation reports for the Steinbock period indicate use of Knickebein by main force aircraft.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30th August 2017, 22:31
Marcel Hogenhuis's Avatar
Marcel Hogenhuis Marcel Hogenhuis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Venlo - the Netherlands
Posts: 799
Marcel Hogenhuis will become famous soon enough
Re: X and Y-Verfahren

Dear Nick, SirBob, Ed and Brian,

Thanks for your interesting comments! Nice to learn that Knickebein and Benito was used a bit longer than I thought.

Best regards, Marcel
__________________
airfield Venlo in WW-2, I./NJG 1, He219-project
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 31st August 2017, 09:03
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is online now
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 5,795
Nick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura about
Re: X and Y-Verfahren

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcel Hogenhuis View Post
Dear Nick, SirBob, Ed and Brian,

Thanks for your interesting comments! Nice to learn that Knickebein and Benito was used a bit longer than I thought.

Best regards, Marcel
I wonder if they just used everything they had in the hope that at least one system would still get through the jamming.
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31st August 2017, 11:31
Brian Bines Brian Bines is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,378
Brian Bines is on a distinguished road
Re: X and Y-Verfahren

No claim to being an expert on this just passing on what I understand from the 'K' reports from aircrew and on Luftwaffe Radio and Radar assessments etc I have, so any corrections welcome. Not certain how badly the Egon system was subject to jamming but reports show the contact between the ground station and the aircraft were. This resulting in instructions being sent by both R/T and W/T , with modification being planned to the FuGe 25 to eliminate the need for such communication . Up until the loss of Z6+HK on the 24-02-44 the use of Hyperbol ( direct use of British Gee equipment and signals ) was utilised, the accuracy over the UK near to the ground stations being potentially more accurate. This being superceded by the Truhe system with German made receivers and ground stations on the same principle.
I believe the Freya pulse of the Egon system had a range of some 250 km. to the aircraft's FuGe 25. was best received at higher altitudes and could only deal with one aircraft every ten minutes. The release of Sky markers would have needed accurate Met info. however on some Steinbock raids wind direction and speed were completely wrong dispersing the markers to add to any jamming problems.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:46.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net