|
Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dornier 17-Z, Goodwin Sands, 26 August 1940
Surprised this has not yet been discussed here:
http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/london/n...oodwin%20Sands Or did I miss it? A stunning sidescan image of the bomber, too. Last edited by Andy Saunders; 14th April 2012 at 10:38. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dornier 17-Z, Goodwin Sands, 26 August 1940
Hi Andy,
Thanks for posting that, I assume that its 5K+AR of 7/KG3, with three POWs and one crewman killed. It would be a great recovery 70 years on, wonder if its a possibility, Regards Brian Bines |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Dornier 17-Z, Goodwin Sands, 26 August 1940
Yes it is said to be 5K+AR and if it is, two crew were POW, 2 killed, buried in Holland and Cannock Chase. I have been involved in this since Nov last year so expect an article in 'Flypast' shortly, including photos of a 5K+AR and 5K+GR, both of which were lost this day
Last edited by Chris Goss; 30th August 2010 at 15:35. Reason: Typo |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dornier 17-Z, Goodwin Sands, 26 August 1940
Hi Chris, fantastic news that at last we may get the chance to see some substantial remains of the only Dornier 17Z in existence.
The fact its been submerged in sea water for 70 years will know doubt add to the problems in recovering this rare bird! Please keep us posted on your forthcoming article! Rgs, Steve. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dornier 17-Z, Goodwin Sands, 26 August 1940
It will certainly be a fantastic coup if it can be pulled off. However, the difficulties of such recoveries are enormous as evidenced (for example) by the salvage of the Loch Ness Wellington and the Me 109 off Dymchurch recovered by Brenzett Museum in the 1970s. In the case of an aircraft partially submerged in silt or sand, that is a huge factor. Removal of such material is essential, obviously, otherwise the weight simply tears the airframe apart as in the case of the Spitfire recovered from the beach at Calais some years ago. However, I have no doubt that a proper plan and a professional recovery team will be in place to carry out what will be an enormously challenging and exciting project. Sadly, the site has already been dived on regularly (whether "legally" or not I don't know) and numerous treasures recovered including all five MG15s and an MP40 amongst other 'trophies'.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dornier 17-Z, Goodwin Sands, 26 August 1940
We are most amused to see that, once again, Mr Saunders has been indulging in one of his well known flights of fancy, both on this and other forums, implying in his fairly unsubtle way that this museum, custodians of the country’s largest collection of Battle of Britain artefacts and memorabilia, is already holding parts of this Dornier. Any Do17Z parts in our collection have been in our possession for many years and were not “recently recovered” as Mr Saunders states. We are sure that Mr Saunders, who has widely proclaimed his knowledge of the Battle , is well aware that there are at least five wrecks of Do17s in the vicinity of the Goodwin Sands alone, and guns (and other items) from these wrecks are in the possession of several other museums and private collections. It is also worth adding that we have never recovered an MP40 from an undersea crash as Mr Saunders states, and, indeed, the three examples of this weapon that we do hold have all been obtained from private sources and none have been recovered from a crash site, as their condition testifies.
We must reluctantly assume that it is his well known animosity to this museum that has prompted this correspondence and we now consider this matter closed. For those of you who are interested in facts about the Kent Battle of Britain Museum, there is a book covering the early days of our research and recovery, whose author has been involved since its inception, and who has not had to rely upon rumour and hearsay, which is due to be published in the early part of 2011. Trustees - Kent Battle of Britain Museum |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Dornier 17-Z, Goodwin Sands, 26 August 1940
You mean by not mentioning your organisation once in his post? If you have a private quarrel, it would be better kept private.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Dornier 17-Z, Goodwin Sands, 26 August 1940
To be fair Nick, I'm glad that we are able to hear both sides of this discussion, especially since locations and collections have been mentioned in the public domain, albeit in a round and about way. Mind you, not that I have any preference for who it right or wrong, but hearing both sides surely benefits everybody?
Cheers Peter D Evans LEMB Administrator |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Dornier 17-Z, Goodwin Sands, 26 August 1940
Quote:
Perhaps Dave is saying: "Yes, we have MG 17s in our collection which were acquired legitimately. We are delighted that a Do 17 is to be recovered and wish the RAF Museum every success. We will naturally contribute whatever we can towards a faithful restoration of this machine, which is in the interests of all who care for aviation history." Or he might be saying: "What we have we keep." Or … any number of other possibilities. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Dornier 17-Z, Goodwin Sands, 26 August 1940
I couldn't agree more Nick, the whole affair with regards the items removed is as clear as mud! To be fair, Dave's post #6 has been replicated on the FlyPast forum where the issue of plundered weapons has been discussed in detail. I have also been in PM with contact with members here and elsewhere who were able to confirm more to me in private. There certainly appears to be more to some of the discussion than meets the the eye of the casual enthusiast and I detect a very strong undercurrent of distrust and questioning of my motives. My personal interest all along when learning of this exciting project has been to see all the illegally plundered materials reunited with the airframe. No other motives or hidden agenda other than that and to hear both sides of the argument help me understand the bigger picture...
Cheers Peter D Evans LEMB Administrator Last edited by Peter D Evans; 4th September 2010 at 18:50. Reason: Poor grammar & spelling |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Friendly fire WWII | Brian | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 803 | 8th July 2023 15:47 |
Heinz Bar - JG51 Battle of Britain activity during August 15-18th, 1940?? | Mark Copeland | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 0 | 28th February 2010 16:13 |
He 111 loss 19 August 1940 (& Other losses) | Andy Saunders | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 11 | 13th August 2009 01:01 |
Stab./KG26 | anderbe | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 25 | 28th March 2009 08:45 |
Book on French AF 1939-40? | The_Catman | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 68 | 10th August 2008 15:58 |