Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 5th October 2024, 21:10
Peter Cook Peter Cook is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 286
Peter Cook is on a distinguished road
Fw 58 or He 59 - 11 August 1940

Brian's research for this forthcoming 3rd volume in his Battle of Britain history has pointed out for me a possible connumdrum over an incident that took place over the Channel on 11 August 1940. A Fw 58 'hack' aircraft was apparently attacked by Spitfires of 610 Squadron, who reported it as a He 59, they then went on to attack a second He 59, which was claimed as damaged, before they were attacked in turn by Bf 109s. Uffz Ferdinand Decker, a groundcrewman with 5./JG 54, was wounded in the attack on the Fw 58, and Brian's research links the shooting down of two 610 Squadron's Spitfires to claims by Hptm Dietrich Hrabak and Ofw Hier of 4./JG 54.
However, my own research raises some questions. 610 Squadron took off at 10.46 and F/L Smith's claim for a He 59 damaged was made at 11.15. But the claims by Hrabak and Hier, as listed in Tony Wood's OKL Luftwaffe claims file, were timed at 10.00 and 10.05 BST respectively – over an hour earlier – and can be linked to an engagement over the Channel with Spitfires of 64 and 74 Squadrons. It is much more likely that 610 Squadron were attacked by I./JG 52, which made three claims for Spitfires between 11.23 and 11.25 BST.

On the issue of the Fw 58 versus a He 59, I find it hard to imagine that as the pilots of 610 Squadron encountered two He 59s, they did not spot the obvious difference between the Fw 58, which had no floats and was a monoplane, versus the much larger He 59 which was a biplane with twin floats. On the issue of Uffz Ferdinand Deckert, Michael Balss' Luftwaffe claims and losses book lists him as wounded as part of the crew of a He 59 of Seenotflugkdo 2 that was attacked later that day off Cherbourg:

Balss - 2018 - Luftwaffe Losses & Claims - Vol. 3 p. 225
Seenot.St. Cherbourg - OP - Kanal
Take off Cherbourg - Off Calais - Shot down in flames by Spitfire (601.Sq.)
He 59 D - 100% damage
Bm Uffz. Ferdinand Deckert WIA (von 2.(H)/14), 3 crew safe

Any thoughts?

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 5th October 2024, 21:48
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 5,946
Nick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura about
Re: Fw 58 or He 59 - 11 August 1940

From TNA HW 13/28: German Naval Air Activity Vol. II: Carrier- and land-based units (28 Dec 1939–31 Dec 1940)
11 August 1940, North Sea

… the bulk of the work was done by CWA (Cherbourg?) who controlled surface craft CWW, CWT, LWH and LWB between 0545 and 1705. CWW left port at 0545 and reported a strong swell and state of sea 3–4. At 1104, he sighted 5 aircraft in close formation 50 km 330º W. of Cherbourg. He sent out an SOS at 1246 reporting a salvage aircraft in flames. The crew was picked up and control was asked to have an ambulance and surgeon at the harbour for a severe casualty. Meanwhile, at 1244, CWT also sent out an SOS announcing that he was engaging enemy fighters. At 1301 a third unit LWH told control he was proceeding to place of accident (position was not given) … CWT informed Control at 1405 that he had pcked up a Flight Serjeant [sic] (Nr. 14 60027) and handed him over to an S-boat.
"Salvage aircraft" is (I think) what the British listeners were calling what we'd term a rescue aircraft.
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 9th October 2024, 18:13
Seaplanes Seaplanes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ski, Norway
Posts: 758
Seaplanes will become famous soon enough
Re: Fw 58 or He 59 - 11 August 1940

On 11 August 1940 the He 59D W.Nr. 1845 St.kz. TW+HL of Seenotflugkdo.2 in Cherbourg was reported 100% lost in the Channel off Cherbourg. One source says "Brennend abgestürzt" and another that the plane capsized during rescue attempt. Lt.z.See Kemper and Fw. Dahmen were rescued. What happend to the rest of the crew, Obgefr. Apelt and Uffz. Palm, is not known.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 9th October 2024, 18:33
Chris Goss's Avatar
Chris Goss Chris Goss is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 11,461
Chris Goss has a spectacular aura aboutChris Goss has a spectacular aura aboutChris Goss has a spectacular aura about
Re: Fw 58 or He 59 - 11 August 1940

...and this sounds like the He 59 destroyed by 604 Sqn. 601 claimed no He 59s and "off Cherbourg" is way out of 610 Sqn's operating area
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 9th October 2024, 21:03
Peter Cook Peter Cook is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 286
Peter Cook is on a distinguished road
Re: Fw 58 or He 59 - 11 August 1940

Thanks for the input, Nick, 'Seaplanes', and Chris,

The main part of my request concerned the action involving 610 Squadron, which made its He 59 claims over the Channel, '3 miles off Calais' according to F/L Smith's combat report, many miles from Cherbourg. The He 59s attacked by 610 Squadron were presumaby from Seenotflugkdo 3, based at Boulogne, which reported no losses.

There is still the question of the Fw 58 and Uffz Ferdinand Decker – which unit did he belong to, and how could Smith have confused a Fw 58 with a He 59?

In a recent emial exchange with Brian Cull he remembered that Chris has posted the following on the Key-Aero forum:

Curiously, Uffz Ferdinand Decker, a groundcrewman from 5./JG 54, was wounded by two British fighters while flying in a twin-engined Focke-Wulf Fw 58 Weihe monoplane. This had taken off at 1100hrs to help drop a dinghy to two survivors of a Blenheim of 53 Squadron shot down earlier. Decker was wounded in the leg for his troubles by Flt Lt Edward Smith of 610 Squadron off Calais; Smith had claimed to have damaged a Heinkel He 59 biplane.

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10th October 2024, 00:44
Chris Goss's Avatar
Chris Goss Chris Goss is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 11,461
Chris Goss has a spectacular aura aboutChris Goss has a spectacular aura aboutChris Goss has a spectacular aura about
Re: Fw 58 or He 59 - 11 August 1940

……fog of war I would say
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10th October 2024, 13:55
JoMe JoMe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Offenbach / Germany
Posts: 489
JoMe is on a distinguished road
Re: Fw 58 or He 59 - 11 August 1940

Hi

On this day, two He 50 sea rescue aircraft from SN-Flugkdo.2 (SN Flugkdo. Cherbourg) are said to have been lost.
The He59/TW+HL was lost when it rolled over during a water landing in the British Channel, another He59 (no further details are known) was seen burned out (RL2III/1147, page 48).
The Fw58 must be considered separately. At this time, the fighter units deployed on the Channel had their own sea rescue aircraft (Fw 58), which they probably used independently. Uffz Ferdinand Deckert from II./JG 54 was wounded during one of these sea rescue missions (in aerial combat). Nothing further is known about this Fw 58 either.

JoMe
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10th October 2024, 14:04
Seaplanes Seaplanes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ski, Norway
Posts: 758
Seaplanes will become famous soon enough
Re: Fw 58 or He 59 - 11 August 1940

The FW58 joined the Seenotdienst during the summer of 1940. They were stationed with fighter units along the coast all the way from Norway to France, and eventually they became the "Hilfsseenotdienst (Luft)". These planes could drop small life-boats (probably a rubber dinghy) and other stuff to fighter pilots in distress, much quicker than the He 59.
A couple of the early ones arrived in Norderney for Seenotdienst on 9 August 1940. They were:
FW 58 RG+NN W.Nr. 58076 and KB+HP W.Nr. 58023.

I have used the Werk-Nummern and Stammkennzeichen as written in the KTB of Seenotzentrale Nord (Luft).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
He59 operating off Isle of Wight August 1940 BrianC Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 5 11th September 2024 11:32
Spitfire Loss, Sgt Manton 610 Squadron, 29 August 1940 Peter Cook Allied and Soviet Air Forces 7 18th August 2024 21:12
New website for RAF Aircraft Losses September 1939 to August 1940. Martin Gleeson Links 14 11th August 2024 02:32
Battle of Britain Airfields Under Attack: 19 August 1940 – 6 September 1940 edwest2 Books and Magazines 0 5th August 2024 19:26
"Manston Mutiny" August 1940 BrianC Allied and Soviet Air Forces 5 19th May 2024 19:17


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:34.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net