Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 4th December 2019, 23:44
TigerTimon TigerTimon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Gelderland
Posts: 36
TigerTimon is on a distinguished road
Question Ju 88 endurance

Hello everyone,

what is the endurance for the several Ju 88 variants?
Could a night fighter Ju 88 C-6 stay up in the air for five hours?

Kind regards,

Timon
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 4th December 2019, 23:54
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 4,344
Nick Beale will become famous soon enough
Re: Ju 88 endurance

Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerTimon View Post
Hello everyone,

what is the endurance for the several Ju 88 variants?
Could a night fighter Ju 88 C-6 stay up in the air for five hours?

Kind regards,

Timon
The Ju 88 A-17 torpedo bomber had a range of 2300 km and a cruising speed of about 290 km/h so a five-hour endurance for a C-6 doesn't seem unreasonable.
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 5th December 2019, 00:35
Jukka Juutinen Jukka Juutinen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 926
Jukka Juutinen is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Ju 88 endurance

Here it is extremely important to note that endurance of piston-engined aircraft, especially those with lots of power, can be greatly extended by flying slow well below the speed for maximum air range. I don't have accurate figures for the Ju 88, but e.g. the Spitfire can be flown for endurance for well over 2 hours on internal fuel alone.
__________________
"No man, no problem." Josef Stalin possibly said...:-)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 5th December 2019, 01:19
13starsinax 13starsinax is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 13
13starsinax is on a distinguished road
The JU-88 R, especially with the drop tanks on wings could. I do not think I am allowed to post pictures yet. Do a search for drop tanks on the 88, The reconnaissance versions had greater range.

JU-88 D1 with drop tanks. Sorry I am still learning the forum, and how to post.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Junkers_Ju_88_with_drop_tanks D1.jpg (72.5 KB, 45 views)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 5th December 2019, 17:35
Graham Boak Graham Boak is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 1,558
Graham Boak is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Ju 88 endurance

Sorry Jukka, but I sincerely hope that no-one relies on this advice. All aircraft have a minimum drag speed. This is also the optimum speed for maximum endurance, because more power is needed to fly either faster (because of an increase in zero-lift drag) or slower (because of an increase in lift-induced drag). I suggest looking up the term "drag polar".

I'm afraid my official technical education in performance was restricted to jet engines. In this case the optimum cruise speed is indeed faster than the optimum endurance speed, because of the behaviour of the turbine engine with velocity. (As I understand it.) Many years after first being gainfully employed in the business, I had the opportunity to study the notes of a fellow engineer from another college, and was surprised to learn that for a piston engined aircraft the speed for best endurance and the speed for best range are identical - the minimum drag speed.

So once at the optimum cruise speed, any Ju.88 pilot could only fly at a lower speed by increasing power. This is because of the need to fly at a greater angle of attack to obtain enough lift, hence increasing the lift-induced drag, which would increase the total drag more than the reduction in zero-lift drag gained by reducing speed. More power = higher fuel flow = less endurance. And less range.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 5th December 2019, 18:39
chuckschmitz's Avatar
chuckschmitz chuckschmitz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 437
chuckschmitz is on a distinguished road
Re: Ju 88 endurance

"JU-88 D1 with drop tanks. Sorry I am still learning the forum, and how to post."

Drop tanks from a P-38 used to ferry that D-1 across Africa and to the USA. Aircraft is now at the National Museum of the USAF in Ohio, USA.

Chuck
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 5th December 2019, 19:00
edNorth edNorth is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,970
edNorth is on a distinguished road
Re: Ju 88 endurance

Ju 88 D´s of Westa´s (Weather Recce) presumably with one or two 900 L centre slung drop tanks was capable of 7-8,5 hours as matter of routine (2.800 km). Racks on outer wings could be fitted, but not used on about 99% of them. The use of outer racks (usually) exceeded MAX TOW permissible IIRC. One or more 10,5 hours 3.500 km flight to Rockall and back to Stavanger is known from some log.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 5th December 2019, 19:43
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 4,344
Nick Beale will become famous soon enough
Re: Ju 88 endurance

Naval ULTRA is full of notifications to naval authorities of Ju 88 (and other types) giving their time out over the coast and time when they are expected back. See the attached examples.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screenshot 2019-12-02 at 17.00.03.jpg (267.7 KB, 31 views)
File Type: jpg ZIP:ZTPG:187606.jpg (252.9 KB, 32 views)
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 6th December 2019, 10:52
jschreiber jschreiber is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 24
jschreiber is on a distinguished road
Re: Ju 88 endurance

Hello

Some standard figures are in the A-4 handbook, from where ball park extrapolations are possible. Since the C-6 airframe is basically the same, the error margin should be acceptable.

With full internal fuel (3 800 l), the A-4 was given for 5h45 endurance, at "max continuous" power (82 %). At an "economical cruise" setting (65 %), endurance is a bit above 7 hours. More can be obtained by reducing the power settings if the engines are complying, but the airplane, especially at full load, has also to remain safely flyable and maneuverable for the average pilot.

I dont know for what speed the Ju-88 wing was optimized. So my estimates are conservative (more drag at economical cruise settings, despite being partially compensated by less specific consumption - approx 15 %)

A maritime patrol configuration (full internal fuel plus 2 x 900 l with very few ordnance) could have a standard endurance of approx 11 hours at 65 % power settings.

For what it's worth...

Have a nice day


J Schreiber
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 6th December 2019, 16:06
ArtieBob ArtieBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sharps Chapel, TN USA
Posts: 376
ArtieBob
Re: Ju 88 endurance

Extrapolating Ju 88 A-4 cruise and range performance to C-6 should be done with great care. Although they share the same basic air frame and engines, the empty c.g. shifts forward on the C-6 because of the weight of the armor and guns in the nose and this
was even more marked with addition of guns in the Bola. Landing a C-6 was reportedly affected to the point it was difficult to get the tail down in low fuel state, particularly if the guns had not been fired.
best regards,
ArtieBob
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1./(F)123 Losses 1943 Melvin Brownless Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 43 30th January 2016 12:33
Ju 88 G-7 Roger Gaemperle Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 5 6th December 2012 13:52
11.04.1944 Bay of Biscay battle ZG1 vs. RAS 151 sqn 248 sqn FrankieS Allied and Soviet Air Forces 10 24th October 2012 20:44
Ju188 lost in France Eric Larger Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 16 16th December 2011 00:47
Athens-Tatoi Andy Mitchell Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 22 30th July 2010 19:45


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net