Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 29th July 2021, 19:34
Revi16 Revi16 is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,212
Revi16 is on a distinguished road
Fw-189 update

New photos to me at least.
https://www.aircraftrestorationcompany.com/fw189
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29th July 2021, 23:52
Adriano Baumgartner Adriano Baumgartner is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,210
Adriano Baumgartner is on a distinguished road
Re: Fw-189 update

Amazing....sadly a project that still requires some years and a lot of $$$$ to be completed and finished. Hope someone with the financial capability will carry on.

Nice photos indeed...good for modellers as well.

A
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30th July 2021, 23:01
markjsheppard markjsheppard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 680
markjsheppard is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Fw-189 update

Thought $1.5m for the airframe was a good low price.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30th July 2021, 23:21
John Manrho John Manrho is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,478
John Manrho is on a distinguished road
Re: Fw-189 update

Mmmmm how much of that bird is still original....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 1st August 2021, 22:21
harrison987 harrison987 is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,328
harrison987 is on a distinguished road
Re: Fw-189 update

I know the main wing spar was too damaged for use. When it comes it aircraft...regardless of how many original aluminum parts you have (even if near perfect)...you have to replace everything.

Aluminum age hardens...and it is far too risky to fly any aircraft without replacing 80% of the airframe.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 3rd August 2021, 20:06
Revi16 Revi16 is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,212
Revi16 is on a distinguished road
Re: Fw-189 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by harrison987 View Post
I know the main wing spar was too damaged for use. When it comes it aircraft...regardless of how many original aluminum parts you have (even if near perfect)...you have to replace everything.

Aluminum age hardens...and it is far too risky to fly any aircraft without replacing 80% of the airframe.

Not sure where you get the above, but 80% of the airframes on DC-3's, AT-6's, T-28's, B-17's (to name a few) have not been replaced. Unless there is damage or corrosion the original aluminum parts are still with it, wing spars, wing/fuselage skins, etc..

There are instances when rare aircraft are 80% new or even higher because they are using the data plate to start a rebuild with a lack of parts, but saying aluminum age hardens and is too risky to keep flying is inaccurate.

Last edited by Revi16; 3rd August 2021 at 21:48.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 3rd August 2021, 21:56
markjsheppard markjsheppard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 680
markjsheppard is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Fw-189 update

One that I saw when first recovered and researched in detail with Finnish friends.

Not sure how it can be called a replica when you start with 95% of an original airframe. Most damaged section was the glasshouse but the center section, wings, fins and tailplane were all there. Both engines and cowlings. Booms also but a bit distorted.

As with the '190 A-5, there is a vast amount of original material. I would guess the stork and tactical markings on the fin would be retained unrestored and replaced.

I would like to see it restored. Whether flying or static. Been a long time - nearly 30 years!

I think it was also discovered it was used for testing in 1941 - I can't recall if Bremen or somewhere else. Something was sent to me years ago but I currently can't locate.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/avar...95631907291331

regards,

MS
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 1st August 2021, 23:32
John Manrho John Manrho is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,478
John Manrho is on a distinguished road
Re: Fw-189 update

Sure, if you want to make it airworthy. So what is the use of recovering an aircraft if you throw away 80% anyway. My take: Just preserve it to static status and use as much as possible of the original
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 2nd August 2021, 13:59
harrison987 harrison987 is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,328
harrison987 is on a distinguished road
Re: Fw-189 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Manrho View Post
Sure, if you want to make it airworthy. So what is the use of recovering an aircraft if you throw away 80% anyway. My take: Just preserve it to static status and use as much as possible of the original
It is more valuable restored.

But...I agree with you.

Look at the gorgeous Japanese Zero that was recovered many years ago...LOADS of original paint. But...it now hangs restored from the ceiling of a museum, nothing left original.

The Fw190 out of Russia that Flying Heritage has...was a BEAUTIFUL wreck. Nothing left original. Now restored and flying...though they spent $15M...it is worth maybe $5M at the high side.

Same with Me109 G6 411077. the entire fuselage is made new.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 3rd August 2021, 11:02
DaveM2 DaveM2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 263
DaveM2
Re: Fw-189 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by harrison987 View Post
It is more valuable restored.

But...I agree with you.

Look at the gorgeous Japanese Zero that was recovered many years ago...LOADS of original paint. But...it now hangs restored from the ceiling of a museum, nothing left original.

The Fw190 out of Russia that Flying Heritage has...was a BEAUTIFUL wreck. Nothing left original. Now restored and flying...though they spent $15M...it is worth maybe $5M at the high side.

Same with Me109 G6 411077. the entire fuselage is made new.
The 190 analogy is incorrect, very much original, including 90% of the skins, hence the cost.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fw 200 C-5, the invisible sub-type? A review of published and documentary sources. INM@RLM Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 20 10th August 2019 11:50
I./ & IV./JG51 losses, Velikije Luki, 11.1942 - 01.43 Evgeny Velichko Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 9 4th August 2013 22:20
Sept 1942 Fw-189 Stalingrad area losses James A Pratt III Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 1 6th April 2013 00:05
sg10 in July 1944 keith A Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 5 14th June 2012 13:46


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:13.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net