Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20th June 2017, 22:30
Brian Brian is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Posts: 3,972
Brian is on a distinguished road
StG.5 1942

Hi guys

Firstly, does anyone know of a publication covering StG.5's operations during 1942 in Russia's Far North?

Secondly, were Ju87s operated against the Allied convoys to Murmansk in 1942? There are several eyewitness reports of Stukas being observed - and even shot down.

Cheers
Brian
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20th June 2017, 22:52
edwest2 edwest2 is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 7,530
edwest2 will become famous soon enoughedwest2 will become famous soon enough
Re: StG.5 1942

Hi Brian,


I can suggest this book.


https://www.amazon.com/Junkers-Stuka.../dp/184603308X




Usual disclaimer,
Ed
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21st June 2017, 06:47
PMoz99 PMoz99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 623
PMoz99 is on a distinguished road
Re: StG.5 1942

Hello Brian.
Chapter 2 of the book mentioned by Ed covers 1942.
A quick scan of the chapter reveals around 1.5 pages on StG5 in 1942, and it confirms attacks against the Murmansk railway, and from March 1942 against Murmansk and ships.
From general information, I./StG5 was created on 27/1/42 from IV.(St)/LG1, and was stationed at Rovaniemi until March. Given Romaniemi is over 400km from the coast in any direction, I think it is unlikely the unit participated in convoy attacks before March, but then again I'm not sure just how far they would have ranged. From March the unit was stationed at Alakurrti.
In December 1942 the unit moved to Kirkenes, much closer to the convoy routes.
Apparently in January 1943 32 of its Stukas were relocated to the Leningrad sector. The remainder continued attacks against the Murmansk railway line.
I have nothing else for StG5 until June when it was redesignated again.
Cheers
Peter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21st June 2017, 08:22
Col Bruggy Col Bruggy is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,487
Col Bruggy will become famous soon enough
Re: StG.5 1942

Hi Brian,

Might I recommend the following publication. It is much more comprehensive than the Osprey title already mentioned:

Dive-Bomber and Ground-Attack Units of the Luftwaffe 1933-1945 - A Reference Source Volume 1 - Units - Formation and Redesignation - Commanders - Key Operations - Codes - Emblems.
De Zeng,Henry L Jnr & Douglas G Stankey.
Hersham:Classic,2009.
pp.113-118

As described in the sub-title, ops (and losses) mentioned.

Hopefully, someone with a scanner can help.

Any particular date in mind?

Col.

Last edited by Col Bruggy; 21st June 2017 at 13:27.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21st June 2017, 10:32
Brian Brian is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Posts: 3,972
Brian is on a distinguished road
Re: StG.5 1942

Thanks guys

Ed: I have the Osprey title but as suggested it's not very useful.

Col: The De Zeng/Stankey title is new to me so will have to check it out. I will also check specific dates and come back.

Peter: Thanks for the movement details. In the absence of operational facts, I tend to think that the Ju87s were not able to reach the ships while at sea, and that eyewitnesses were mistaken.

First example:

Convoy PQ-4 the British SS Dan-Y-Bryn was allegedly attacked by Stukas (admittedly not StG.5) on 22 November 1941, according to diary of eyewitness:

(Quote) "Stukas dive-bombed the convoy. The flutes under the wings gave a banshee wail and every seventh shell was a tracer so when one of the gunners on the port wing Oerlikon was hit by a tracer shell, it cauterized the wound and he survived the rough handling when the skipper ordered “that corpse off the bridge”. I put him in the shelter of the wheelhouse, which was reinforced with concrete slabs, and took over the gun for a few exciting seconds. We were in the vicinity of Jan Mayen Island at the extremity of the Stukas' range so it was a short-lived raid. They lost two planes and the crews were dead when picked up [sic]. Temperature 40 below."


Highly unlikely! 'Stukas' may have meant dive-bombing Ju88s (apparently some merchant seamen referred to most bombers at Stukas). But the, I have no record of losses of Ju88s or any other candidates, let alone crew fatalities. Perhaps the date is wrong, though I can't find a similar action/losses.

I'll look for further examples.

Stukas were mentioned on at least three occasions in the diary of an American sailor during Convoy PQ-16 (on May 27)

And during PQ-18, the gunnery officer aboard one vessel wrote:

September 14: "A lone Stuka, breaking out from the cloud ... aims a serious of aggressive passes at HMS Avenger ... the Stuka, now well alight, begins to corkscrew out of the sky (it crashed into the sea nearby) ... there is no sign of the pilot in the blackened cockpit as the fuselage rolls over ..."


Cheers
Brian

Last edited by Brian; 21st June 2017 at 11:03.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21st June 2017, 12:41
PMoz99 PMoz99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 623
PMoz99 is on a distinguished road
Re: StG.5 1942

The Stukas of StG5 are recorded as R's, which means they could carry drop tanks, giving them a range of 860km. But even so, Jan Mayen island is around 1450km+ from their base, so Ju88's sound more likely. Ju-88's often flew armed recon missions, and would be much more likely to fly solo than a Ju-87.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21st June 2017, 16:03
Seaplanes Seaplanes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ski, Norway
Posts: 750
Seaplanes will become famous soon enough
Re: StG.5 1942

I have on hand only information regarding the Convoy P.Q.16. I./St.G.5 made two attacks on shipping in this convoy, both on 30. May 1942. The first attack took place in the morning at about 08:05 (take-off time ??) with 16 Ju 87R aircraft ,and the second on 12:30 (take-off time ??) With 17 Ju 87R. On 30. May 1942 the I./St.g.5 had a total of 38 Ju 87R on strength. I do not have the point of take-off, but even if the unit was located at Rovianemi , its airceaft were quickly moved to other locations like Kirkenes or Banak for operations. My Source Reference is BA/MA RL7/498.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21st June 2017, 16:07
Stig Jarlevik Stig Jarlevik is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,826
Stig Jarlevik will become famous soon enough
Re: StG.5 1942

PMoz99

The standard Ju 87 B was a rather short legged aircraft (P.C.Smith quote a range of 550km for the B-1 and 500 - 595km for the B-2, the latter on the same page in his book! Possibly one data is 'field' data and the other 'factory' data.)
Still quoting Smith the Ju 87 R-1 had a range of 1400km and the R-2 1253km.

I have always understood these figures to be 'ferry' ranges, ie the combat range would then be roughly half, although I think any intelligent pilot would calculate for quite a bit less, meaning the R-1 would be appx 650-680km while the R-2 would come out in the region of 590-620km

Since I presume your range data is a combat one, I wonder what source you are quoting? At least according to Smith his book is 'A Complete History'....

Now, does anyone have the exact route these convoys took? If possible (if I had been in command of a convoy) I would have wanted to be outside the Stuka combat range. Since I am no naval researcher, there might of course have been a myriad of reasons why that would not have been possible, depending on, for example, Winter or Summer conditions, other weather phenomena etc. At least in 1942 the long range of the Ju 87 R must have been pretty well known to the Allies.

Cheers
Stig
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21st June 2017, 17:24
Brian Brian is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Posts: 3,972
Brian is on a distinguished road
Re: StG.5 1942

Most interesting!

So, now we know that the Stukas DID operate on 30 May 1942 against PQ-16. This would have been when the convoy was nearing Murmansk.

No losses? No claims for damage?

Cheers
Brian
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21st June 2017, 17:48
Seaplanes Seaplanes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ski, Norway
Posts: 750
Seaplanes will become famous soon enough
Re: StG.5 1942

No losses or damage was reported during these two attacks. However, I./St.G.5 lost four aircraft around the 30 May 1942.

On 28. May 1942 Ju 87R-2 W.Nr. 5709 was lost over the Bay of Liza. Crew parachuted.

On 01. June 1942 Ju 87R-4 W.Nr. 6324 L1+CV was possibly shot down by flak near Murmansk. One crewmember missing, one uninjured.

On 02. June 1942 Ju 87R-1 W.Nr. 5485 L1+LW was shot down by enemy aircraft. Crew missing.

On 02. June 1942 Ju 87R-1 W.Nr. 5545 L1+EW was shot Down by enemy aircraft. Crew missing.

It is interesting to note that the unit still used aircraft markings as
IV.(St.)/L.G.1.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Danish Pilot Peter Horn - aircraft info wanted PMoz99 Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 70 31st December 2021 21:51
RAF and RAAF ORBs available on the Web (new version) Laurent Rizzotti Allied and Soviet Air Forces 66 12th May 2020 13:14
Is this a true statement about the B24? tcolvin Allied and Soviet Air Forces 52 24th January 2014 17:55
Hurricanes in USSR Carl-Fredrik Geust Allied and Soviet Air Forces 10 18th August 2007 20:37
JG 54 near Leningrad in August, 1942 Andrey Dikov Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 15 9th March 2007 20:54


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:17.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net