Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Japanese and Allied Air Forces in the Far East

Japanese and Allied Air Forces in the Far East Please use this forum to discuss the Air War in the Far East.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11th February 2025, 18:06
Buckeye30's Avatar
Buckeye30 Buckeye30 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bedford, England
Posts: 906
Buckeye30 is on a distinguished road
"Deceptive" camouflage US Navy

One of the most impressive anti-submarine "Confusion" schemes (confuses me anyway) applied to "HANCOCK" on commision, photo is Aug. 1944 en route to Pearl Harbour with Air Group 7 aboard; this is Measure 32/3A also authorised for "INTREPID" and "FRANKLIN". Before her "horseshoe" tail symbols were marked on (SR-2E ordered 21-6-44 but effective from 7-10-44), tail numbers only carried as on her Helldivers here.
By 26 Feb. 1945 "HANCOCK" was in the much simpler Measure 12 (C-S19-7/631).


Nick


https://www.navsource.org/archives/02/021983b.jpg


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_...s_carriers.jpg

Last edited by Buckeye30; 11th February 2025 at 18:10. Reason: Added original drawing
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11th February 2025, 19:24
edwest2 edwest2 is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 8,303
edwest2 has a spectacular aura aboutedwest2 has a spectacular aura about
Re: "Deceptive" camouflage US Navy

The goal of this and other patterns was to cause enough confusion under differing lighting conditions that could result in the delay of a torpedo being fired.

I wonder how many of these patterns continued to exist after the war.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12th February 2025, 13:15
Buckeye30's Avatar
Buckeye30 Buckeye30 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bedford, England
Posts: 906
Buckeye30 is on a distinguished road
Re: "Deceptive" camouflage US Navy

Hi Ed. Ship type and target angle too, also part of the design was visible and part lost as recognised in "SHIPS-2" March 1943. "BuSHIPS C-519-7/631 20 Feb. 1945 ordered Measures 12/21/22 for surface ships superceding "Dazzle" schemes, including carriers in service and under construction ( MS12 on "Hancock") these were simpler schemes; on 10 Aug. 1946 12CL-46 revised the scheme for all surface vessels as Measure 13 Haze Gray.

Regards
Nick
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18th February 2025, 16:27
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is online now
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 6,014
Nick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the rough
Re: "Deceptive" camouflage US Navy

Dazzle camouflage (of which that Hancock photo is an amazing example, by the way) goes back to the Great War, with a number of Britain's then-modern artists involved in producing schemes for the armed forces, some of which also figured in their own paintings.

Edward Wadsworth: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped..._Liverpool.jpg

C.R.W. Nevinson: https://d3d00swyhr67nd.cloudfront.ne...M_5275-001.jpg

Uncredited: https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/i...ject/205183559
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19th February 2025, 17:54
Buckeye30's Avatar
Buckeye30 Buckeye30 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bedford, England
Posts: 906
Buckeye30 is on a distinguished road
Re: "Deceptive" camouflage US Navy

Thanks Nick. The Camel is an-ex night fighter in experimental scheme; the top of the upper wing had diagonal dark stripes angled forward and oval cocardes, the lower wing bottom had light stripes.

Nick
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17th March 2025, 21:18
Buckeye30's Avatar
Buckeye30 Buckeye30 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bedford, England
Posts: 906
Buckeye30 is on a distinguished road
Re: "Deceptive" camouflage US Navy

In early 1945 with the reducing threat from subs and surface ships and the increase in air attacks (primarily Kamikaze) the "Dazzle" schemes 31/32/33 were discontinued and a BuShips Washington instruction on 26 Feb. ( C-S19-7-631) specified Measures better suited to reduced visibility from the air. These were darker blues and grays, a good match for the upper surface camouflage on deck-spotted aircraft ( Semi-Gloss Sea Blue and Sea Blue Gloss).

For carriers these were Measures 12 and 21 (22 on destroyers and cruisers) assigned as per the Feb.26 Order.......
http://www.researcheratlarge.com/Shi...5_S19_631.html

For some reason "Lexington" CV16 was never assigned a Dazzle scheme and remained in her Measure 21 to mid-1945 when she adopted MS 12. At about the same time that carrier camouflage was changed a Technical Letter ( 06040) assigned geometric tail and wing symbols to identify Air Groups aboard CVs, CVLs and CVEs replacing the 1943--44 designs.

Nick
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What exactly is a US Navy MK. 8 GYROSCOPIC Gunsight? harrison987 Allied and Soviet Air Forces 8 11th November 2024 14:50
US Navy A/C History Card question DaveM2 Post-WW2 Military and Naval Aviation 12 24th October 2024 01:53
The U.S. Navy in the Korean War edwest2 Books and Magazines 2 31st May 2024 20:27


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:33.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net