Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 3rd November 2022, 13:29
ArtieBob ArtieBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sharps Chapel, TN USA
Posts: 442
ArtieBob will become famous soon enough
Re: D-16 also known as ?

I cannot confirm whether any Di-6 were operational, but I have seen German photos of Di-6 on captured airfield.


ArtieBob
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 6th November 2022, 09:43
andrus andrus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 71
andrus is on a distinguished road
Re: D-16 also known as ?

My understanding is that DI-6 means "biplane with retractable landing gear".
In most cases it probably was actually I-153.


Kochyerigin DI-6 was known to germans, but I-153 was relatively new aircraft which was not yet in "Kennungsblatt" ?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 6th November 2022, 09:44
oquaig's Avatar
oquaig oquaig is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Santa Cruz, California
Posts: 325
oquaig is on a distinguished road
Re: D-16 also known as ?

Hi everyone,


DI stands for Dvukhmestnyi Istrebitel (Two seat fighter). It resembled the single seat I-15bis, which was replacing it in 1938. Both were biplanes and both had a straight upper wing, unlike the I-153 which had an obviously gulled upper wing. The only difference being the rear gunner in an enclosed cockpit on the DI-6. I would think a keen eyed Luftwaffe pilot would know the difference. There were some 90 still in service in Leningrad, Baltic and Kiev Military districts as of 1 June 1941.


Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 21st November 2022, 16:27
kirche kirche is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Moscow region
Posts: 392
kirche is on a distinguished road
Re: D-16 also known as ?

Hello,
There are mentions that on June 1, 1941, 71 DI-6 aircraft were listed in the entire structure of the VVS RKKA (including rear districts and training units), of which 40 were faulty. But, for example, in the combat composition of the Air Force divisions of the Western, Southwestern, Southern and Karelian fronts in June-July 1941, none of these aircraft appears, as well as losses among them. The applications of German pilots (of which there are about 40) may correspond to the losses of the I-153 aircraft (also a biplane with a star-shaped engine and a retractable landing gear) or the I-15/I-15bis versions (but their landing gear was not removed).
Best regards,
Kirill
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22nd November 2022, 02:56
oquaig's Avatar
oquaig oquaig is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Santa Cruz, California
Posts: 325
oquaig is on a distinguished road
Re: D-16 also known as ?

A quick look at the "Jim P" list for 22/6/1941 shows:


22.06.41 Oblt. Karl Führing Stab IV./JG 51. DJ-6. 03.40. Film C. 2036/IIAnerk: Nr.6 (his fifth claim)
22.06.41 Maj. Friedrich Beckh. Stab IV./JG 51. DJ-6. 06.25. Film C.2036/IIAnerk: Nr.5 (his fifth claim)
22.06.41 Fw. Neuhoff 7./JG 53. DJ-6. 09.30. Film C. 2034Anerk: ASM (his eighth claim)
22.06.41 Oblt. Adolf Kinzinger. 1./JG 54 DJ-6 03.30. Film C.2036/II (his eighth claim)
22.06.41 Oblt. Adolf Kinzinger. 1./JG 54 DJ-6 03.30. Film C.2036/II (his nineth claim)

I still think a keen eyed Luftwaffe pilot would know the difference between a two seat straight wing and a single seat gull wing I-153.


Cheers

Last edited by oquaig; 22nd November 2022 at 03:04. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 22nd November 2022, 08:47
Stig Jarlevik Stig Jarlevik is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,826
Stig Jarlevik will become famous soon enough
Re: D-16 also known as ?

One point of interest which has nothing to do with the original request...

I notice that Kirill claims only 71 DI-6 was left in the entire VVS RKKA structure while Oquaig
state "some 90" remained.

May I ask why this difference?

Cheers
Stig
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
claims of Japanese and Finnish GMichalski Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 6 18th March 2022 16:33
US Navy Parachute Incident July 16, 1929 paulmcmillan Pre-WW2 Military and Naval Aviation 4 30th May 2019 18:44
First Yak9 shot down alessandro bray Allied and Soviet Air Forces 25 6th March 2018 12:45
Ju 88 A-4 WNr 1612, lost on 15 or 16 January 1942 Laurent Rizzotti Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 4 16th January 2012 11:54
Erg.Staffel "K"? Possibly EKdo 16 (JG 400)? Ian Jewison Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 3 10th January 2011 18:29


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:18.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net