Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 24th November 2014, 23:05
John Beaman John Beaman is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
Posts: 2,155
John Beaman is an unknown quantity at this point
date format

In recent weeks, we have seen some varying date formats on posts. Let me plead once again for everyone to use a uniform date format on the various forums. There are variants all over the world, using just numbers. The simplest way to do this is to use the DD-MM-YYYY, as in:

15-Apr-1945

Hey, it is only a few more key strokes!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24th November 2014, 23:39
Larry deZeng Larry deZeng is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,616
Larry deZeng will become famous soon enoughLarry deZeng will become famous soon enough
Re: date format

45/04/08


I think this format, or 45-04-08, was required in the old Microsoft Access programming software from 15 years ago? Don't Perry and Morrison use this format in their data base, or at least used to? Virtually every country, except the Americans, of course, and excluding the U.S. military, use the logical linear progression day-month-year. Some day, long after I'm gone, the U.S. will join the rest of the world and convert to metric and this form of writing dates.

L.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25th November 2014, 02:18
Richard T. Eger Richard T. Eger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seaford, DE, U.S.A.
Posts: 626
Richard T. Eger is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: date format

Dear John and Larry,

We've had this discussion before. The dating convention used by the individual is what it is. Each of us may have created a massive data base using whatever we prefer. On the U.S. side of the pond, as you point out Larry, we go month-day-year. In GB and Europe, you go day-month-year. And, as Larry has pointed out, some go year-month-day. It won't change.

So, one has to hope that, amongst the dates given in a data set that there is at least one date where the number 13 or higher exists, which then provides the key to the Enigma cypher. John, the example of 15-04-45 would clearly provide the author's dating convention.

If there is a question, someone can ask for clarification.

Unfortunately, GB uses both 15/04/45 and 15-04-45 and the U.S. uses 4/15/45 and 04-15-45. Both the U.S. and GB use 15 Apr. 1945 and the U.S. in addition, actually its standard, uses Apr. 15, 1945. I'd say that U.S. use of 15 Apr. 1945 would be pretty much restricted to the military or government.

The one convention, at least up to now, that is unique is the European 15.4.45, although some advertisers here in the U.S. have decided that the dot convention just looks neat and different, resulting in 4.15.45. Hopefully, this is just a passing fad. 15.4.45 also takes up the least amount of type space.

Regards,
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25th November 2014, 10:23
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 5,798
Nick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura about
Re: date format

Unfortunately, GB uses both 15/04/45 and 15-04-45
You rarely see the second of those; much more common is 15.04.45; some Luftwaffe documents use 15.IV.45 (Roman numeral for the month).

It does seem to make sense that if we are discussing events in Europe, we use a European format of day/month/year.
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25th November 2014, 13:33
Richard T. Eger Richard T. Eger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seaford, DE, U.S.A.
Posts: 626
Richard T. Eger is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: date format

Dear Nick,

For the reason you cite, I sometimes use the dot convention, especially if mailing to someone in Europe. That said, my guess is that there are a whole lot of us from the U.S. and, although the U.S. government has dabled in trying to get us to go metric, it hasn't taken. So, it is what it is.

Fortunately, 99+% of what we write here is in English. But, we have a whole lot of members who don't have English as their primary language, but have either learned it well or try as best they can to write here in broken English. Just imagine the mess we would really be in if everyone wrote in their native tongue!!!

The irony is even greater, as we are discussing historical events in Germany where English was certainly not the native tongue. We even have documents written in Sütterlin or a basterdized version thereof and need to come hat in hand to those that actually understand this very old version of German.

Put into perspective, what date convention is used is an annoyance, one we can certainly live with. For those willing to make the effort to be better understood in this regard, we should be grateful. If a scan of the original German document is provided, we know automatically that it follows the day-month-year convention.

Regards,
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25th November 2014, 15:45
SES's Avatar
SES SES is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 05 ON LT 8
Posts: 709
SES
Re: date format

Just a thought. There is NATO standard nn AAA nnnn like 8 MAY 1945 which is clear and unambiguous, but if you create a spreadsheet and want to be able to sort your data by date the EU standard yyyymmdd is the only viable option.
Bregds
SES
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25th November 2014, 15:47
G.R.Morrison G.R.Morrison is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NH, USA
Posts: 455
G.R.Morrison
Re: date format

This reply is merely to 'defend the honor of ancient databases.' We've always used day/month/year (and when first begun in the 1980s, it was on an extinct Apple platform, before Access).

Usually, if I'm responding to an inquiry, I'll write-out the month to lessen confusion. I also follow the German convention of 'Zeit vor Ort,' so when something occurred appears before the location.

BTW, if you've been missing Jim's replies lately, it's because he's been swamped with work.

GRM
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25th November 2014, 16:03
John Beaman John Beaman is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
Posts: 2,155
John Beaman is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: date format

Guys, thanks for all the input and ideas for date formats. My actual point is that pure numeric formats regardless of which sequence/format they follow can still lead to confusion. Eg: 11-4-43. Is this Nov 4 or April 11. That's why, in order to cover all EU, NA, SEA, etc. conventions, we could use an actual month name--eg., Nov, etc. That removes all confusion whether you do it Nov-4-43, 43-Nov-4 or whatever.

I do not think we will get every one on this board to use the same total numeric format, per se, so this might be the best format to work towards. Using a month name is only one more keystroke!

As for the US and metric, I would love it, but the US Congress rejected a change prior to the NAFTA and WTA agreements. Now, after approving these agreements, that we are in "worldwide trading", it amazes me that we are not metric. All manufacturers that export are metric, and to work on my lawn mower I must have metric tools--do not ask me why we have not changed--stupid and education? Its not like we are not familiar with metric. In the '50s and '60s we learned in high school and in university. Many of our athletic competitions, swimming, track, etc. have been metric for years. Frankly, I am not sure who is still fighting this.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25th November 2014, 17:38
Revi16 Revi16 is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,313
Revi16 is on a distinguished road
Re: date format

Count yourselves lucky for being historians of earth wars!

Stardate 41153.7 http://trekguide.com/Stardates.htm

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25th November 2014, 17:38
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 5,798
Nick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura about
Re: date format

Frankly, I am not sure who is still fighting this.
As allies of Revolutionary France (the people who gave us the metric system) it's surprising the USA didn't change over 200 years ago.

Meanwhile in Britain we're officially metric apart from miles (too many roadsigns to change), miles per hour (so car speeds relate to the road signs) and pints (for milk and beer but pretty much any other liquid is now metric). Imperial measurements persist in popular use just because so many people grew up with them and automatically think in those terms.
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
date of some US losses GMichalski Allied and Soviet Air Forces 7 1st August 2013 14:45
StaKas 2./JG77 ? fran Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 9 27th June 2012 00:37
Seeking date and specific location of FL by Ju87B T6+EP of 6./StG2 on hillside above Moselle River near Trier, Germany, winter 1939-40 Larry Hickey Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 11 23rd December 2011 18:50
M-262 shot down April 13th or 18th 1945 by 325th FG at Regensburg Airport. Can anyone confirm details or date please? Mysticpuma Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 5 2nd November 2010 11:23
Date Convention John Beaman General 3 12th January 2007 05:27


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 00:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net