Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Japanese and Allied Air Forces in the Far East

Japanese and Allied Air Forces in the Far East Please use this forum to discuss the Air War in the Far East.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 7th October 2010, 11:09
Brian Brian is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Posts: 3,972
Brian is on a distinguished road
Seagull mistaken for Pete

Hi guys

Has anyone information concerning the possible shoot down of an SOC Seagull floatplane by a USMC F4F Wildcat from Henderson airfield on 5 January 1943? It is believed that the Wildcat pilot mistook the Seagull for a Japanese Pete floatplane.

Cheers
Brian
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11th October 2010, 20:21
Frank Olynyk Frank Olynyk is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,406
Frank Olynyk is on a distinguished road
Re: Seagull mistaken for Pete

Brian,
All USMC claims on Jan 5, 1943 are for Vals. See the PM I sent you earlier.

Frank.
__________________
Civilization is the most fragile ecology of all.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12th October 2010, 19:21
Laurent Rizzotti Laurent Rizzotti is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,917
Laurent Rizzotti is on a distinguished road
Re: Seagull mistaken for Pete

The same day USAAF pilots of 347th FG claimed three Petes.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12th October 2010, 20:10
Brian Brian is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Posts: 3,972
Brian is on a distinguished road
Re: Seagull mistaken for Pete

Ah! Thanks Laurent

Do we know the vicinity of those claims? Where was the 347th based? Who were the claimants?

The plot thickens!

Cheers
Brian
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12th October 2010, 23:02
Frank Olynyk Frank Olynyk is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,406
Frank Olynyk is on a distinguished road
Re: Seagull mistaken for Pete

Brian,
The 347th FG was flying P-38s, not Wildcats. The claims were at Tonolei Harbor, which is on Bougainville, east of Buin and Kahili. I kind of doubt that SOCs would be operating anywhere near there.

The claimants were 1st Lt Emmett L Norris, 68th FS, 1 FBP prob; 1st Lt Besby F Holmes, 339th FS, 1 FBP dest plus 2 FBP prob; Capt John W Mitchell, 339th FS, 1 Float Zero dest; Capt Robert B Hubbell, 68th FS, 1 FBP dest.

You still need to check the PM I sent you last night,

Enjoy!

Frank.
__________________
Civilization is the most fragile ecology of all.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12th October 2010, 23:44
Brian Brian is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Posts: 3,972
Brian is on a distinguished road
Re: Seagull mistaken for Pete

Thanks Frank

The content of your PM noted. Just following up leads.

Cheers
Brian
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14th October 2010, 04:39
JoeB JoeB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 121
JoeB
Re: Seagull mistaken for Pete

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Olynyk View Post
Brian,
The 347th FG was flying P-38s, not Wildcats. The claims were at Tonolei Harbor, which is on Bougainville, east of Buin and Kahili. I kind of doubt that SOCs would be operating anywhere near there.

The claimants were 1st Lt Emmett L Norris, 68th FS, 1 FBP prob; 1st Lt Besby F Holmes, 339th FS, 1 FBP dest plus 2 FBP prob; Capt John W Mitchell, 339th FS, 1 Float Zero dest; Capt Robert B Hubbell, 68th FS, 1 FBP dest.
Just to round out that combat, the Japanese reported a combat with 5 B-17's escorted by 7 P-38. They were intercepted by 6 (land plane) Zeroes of the 202nd Air Group, 2 Type 2 Float Fighters (aka 'float Zero') of 802nd AG and an uncertain number of Type 0 Observation Seaplanes (later called 'Pete') perhaps from ships, since 3 'Petes' of the 958th Air Group apparently sighted the US formation but reported no results. The 202nd claimed 1 P-38 and 2 probables for no loss or damage; the 802nd claimed 2 P-38's, one shared with the 'Petes', and 1 probable for the loss of 1 Type 2 Float Fighter, PO1C Shinkichi Ohshima bailed out; 2 Type 0 Obs. Seaplanes crashlanded. (sources: original records of the named units found at JACAR site; Japanese web source about the 'Petes').
http://www2.cty-net.ne.jp/~purejwp/zakki/suisen.htm

2 P-38's were actually lost, 1Lts Ronald Hilken and Walter Dinn MIA/KIA (source: "13th Fighter Command in WW II" by William Wolf).

Joe
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16th October 2010, 21:11
Brian Brian is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Posts: 3,972
Brian is on a distinguished road
Re: Seagull mistaken for Pete

Many thanks once again Frank, Joe and Richard

OK. So we may not have evidence of an SOC being shot down by friendly fire but the Dauntless was a new for me, anyway. By the way, did the Dauntless not carry a gunner?

I look forward to learning more about this incident in due course.

Cheers
Brian
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SOC-3 Seagull James A Pratt III Japanese and Allied Air Forces in the Far East 2 13th March 2010 22:22
Seagull V or Walrus Mk2 pbhawkin Japanese and Allied Air Forces in the Far East 1 21st July 2008 14:02
Shooting down aircraft by mistaken identity kennethklee Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 2 28th February 2008 03:44
Attack on Seagull alex crawford Allied and Soviet Air Forces 2 18th January 2007 22:53
Seafox or Seagull? alex crawford Allied and Soviet Air Forces 9 11th January 2006 04:14


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 21:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net