|
Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Performance of the Fw 190A on the Deck?
Quote:
Quote:
"However, the result for this specific problem, the speed change required for constant Cl at higher weight, is over ten times higher than the result for the problem in our hand." In other words, you try to use my words so, that the meaning is exactly opposite than in the original text. This is just one example how you have been twisting my words last 14 pages. |
#172
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: Performance of the Fw 190A on the Deck?
No one has twisted your words, Harri.
Quote:
Quote:
You lose the forest for the trees as all you can see is your one specific solution you have been taught to parrot. You don't seem to understand that the force of weight continues to have the same affect on the aircraft whether it is at high velocity or low velocity. If we increase the weight, our aircraft needs to overcome it to maintain performance. I don't know how else to tell you that much clearer. Any lower level aerodynamics course will tell you exactly the same thing and to prove that you can easily perform a parametric study on your own. Try thinking really hard on this part, Harri: Quote:
That is evidenced by your own calculations: Quote:
Quote:
So when we isolate the affects of weights in a parametric study to see the true affect, we can only conclude that weight has very significant affects upon an aircraft, even at high speeds. All the best, Crumpp |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Performance of the Fw 190A on the Deck?
Quote:
This is the principal difference between these approaches and allready pointed out in the posts #21, #24... and also #150 of this thread, which you continously misquote and try use to for exactly opposite purpose, it was originally posted. But as allready seen in this thread, there is no limit how far you will go on this. In the AH board you were banned for this kind of manners and I've been told that the same happened in the ww2aircraft.net, where I have never posted. |
#174
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Performance of the Fw 190A on the Deck?
Although this is an interesting thread, it has not really been a constructive discussion for some time now.
I'm closing the thread, since the original topic has been largely overshadowed by a mathematical argument. But I would like to add that it was refreshing to step away from the beaten path.
__________________
Ruy Horta 12 O'Clock High! And now I see with eye serene The very pulse of the machine; A being breathing thoughtful breath, A traveller between life and death; |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most One Sided Luftwaffe Victory over the 8th Air Force | Rob Romero | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 22 | 18th August 2010 22:55 |
Fw 190A <III of II./JG 26 | CJE | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 2 | 25th February 2007 15:36 |
Spitfire losses January 22nd, 1943 | Jochen Prien | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 5 | 14th September 2006 01:35 |
Aircraft performance curves | Christer Bergström | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 17 | 19th November 2005 21:49 |
Low altitude tests: P-47 vs. Fw 190 | Six Nifty .50s | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 4 | 20th April 2005 00:13 |