Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 3rd October 2024, 19:35
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 5,932
Nick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura about
BP+FO, W.Br. 7204

I have an ULTRA reference to this aircraft from March 1945. The Stammkennzeichen seems to fall with a block of Siebel Si 204's (and ithat fits the context) but can anyone confirm its identity?
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 3rd October 2024, 20:03
Matti Salonen Matti Salonen is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 3,211
Matti Salonen will become famous soon enough
Re: BP+FO, W.Br. 7204

I have Si 204 D-1, WNr. 321281, BP+FO. I have no Si 204 with WNr. 7204.

Matti
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 3rd October 2024, 20:53
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 5,932
Nick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura about
Re: BP+FO, W.Br. 7204

Thank you Matti.

This was from an ULTRA message (CX/MSS/R483(C),21:
To AMC [Air Movement Control] Unterschlauersbach from AMC Lechfeld, dated 4/3 [1945]:
Request landing report of 7204 BP+FO. Took off from Lechfeld at 0735/(smudge)2.
So I wonder what "7402" meant if it wasn't a Werk Nummer? Another aviation mystery!
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 3rd October 2024, 22:14
Franek Grabowski Franek Grabowski is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 2,382
Franek Grabowski is on a distinguished road
Re: BP+FO, W.Br. 7204

Read it 7-204, which suggests Si 204 in some code I guess. There was 8-109, but I do not remember if 8 denoted fighter aircraft or aircraft,
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 3rd October 2024, 22:20
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 5,932
Nick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura about
Re: BP+FO, W.Br. 7204

Quote:
Originally Posted by Franek Grabowski View Post
Read it 7-204, which suggests Si 204 in some code I guess. There was 8-109, but I do not remember if 8 denoted fighter aircraft or aircraft,
8- were airframes and 9- were engines but thank you Franek because you inspired a thought that gave me the answer. Maybe the cipher clerk read "Siebel" as "Sieben" (= seven)?
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 4th October 2024, 02:06
Franek Grabowski Franek Grabowski is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 2,382
Franek Grabowski is on a distinguished road
Re: BP+FO, W.Br. 7204

Possibly, unless there was another code for such communications.
I wonder, do you have complete aircraft traffic in Ultra?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 4th October 2024, 08:13
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 5,932
Nick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura about
Re: BP+FO, W.Br. 7204

Quote:
Originally Posted by Franek Grabowski View Post
I wonder, do you have complete aircraft traffic in Ultra?
No, just a part of what is there for 1944–45, a few things from late 1943, items from Summer 1942 that related to my Kommando Koch project, one message from 1941 … there are hundreds of thousands of items from the Luftwaffe and army, even before you get to the naval material (which often links to Allied or German air operations) or the police and intelligence services’ signals (which I have looked at but are very hard to find anything specific in; they are in German and are mostly from and to callsigns whose meaning I don’t know). I haven’t seen the Reichsbahn traffic at all but I believe there is some.
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 4th October 2024, 09:21
Stig Jarlevik Stig Jarlevik is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,038
Stig Jarlevik will become famous soon enoughStig Jarlevik will become famous soon enough
Re: BP+FO, W.Br. 7204

Confess I was impressed by Nick's lateral thinking here.

Sieben 204 (is 7204)

Siebel 204 is just that, the aircraft type. Also it STKZ was used upon landing.

Why didn't I think of that?

Cheers
Stig
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 4th October 2024, 11:21
Snautzer's Avatar
Snautzer Snautzer is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,427
Snautzer will become famous soon enoughSnautzer will become famous soon enough
Re: BP+FO, W.Br. 7204

Could it be the last 4 didgits of o a si204
Like Bu181 BN+OT Wrknr 16170 LSK4 43-44 the picture has the plane with the last 4 didgits 6170. I can imagine germans using the visable number in their communications

Picture https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/thread...4#post-1962784
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 4th October 2024, 23:49
Stig Jarlevik Stig Jarlevik is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,038
Stig Jarlevik will become famous soon enoughStig Jarlevik will become famous soon enough
Re: BP+FO, W.Br. 7204

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snautzer View Post
Could it be the last 4 didgits of o a si204
Like Bu181 BN+OT Wrknr 16170 LSK4 43-44 the picture has the plane with the last 4 didgits 6170. I can imagine germans using the visable number in their communications

Picture https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/thread...4#post-1962784
As per Matti's answer we know that BP+FO was WNr 321281 and nobody (so far) has ever heard
of a Si 204 with Wnr 7204.
Stig

Last edited by Stig Jarlevik; 5th October 2024 at 13:48. Reason: Correcting possible misunderstanding
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 22:53.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net