Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Allied and Soviet Air Forces

Allied and Soviet Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the Air Forces of the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 30th September 2017, 03:15
Frank Olynyk Frank Olynyk is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,406
Frank Olynyk is on a distinguished road
Re: USAAF Claims for Me 163s

Peter,

Here is Garlich's report on the Feb 23 mission. It is part of a Squadron Strafing Report, of Neuburg A/D.

I was flying Green 4 and came in over Neuburg A/D to the left of my flight leader, Lt. Ludeke, between him and purple flight and behind Capt McNeff and Lt. Schmidt. There were 6-8 E/A parked wing tip to wing tip in the SE corner of the field, and I concentrated on the 3rd one from the west. I opend fire at 700 yards and immediately began to register hits. As I closed to point blank range, there was an explosion and the plane, a T/E aircraft, caught fire. As I pulled off the field I observed one large fire in the area in which I felt encompassed several aircraft, including the one I had destroyed. I claim 1 T/E U/A destroyed.

My notes say this was in box 3373, Record Group 18, Entry 7A at NARA II, digitized on April 25, 2011. I had microfilmed this material back in the early '80s, when it was held at the Washington Record Center at Suitland, Maryland.

On the first page of the report, which lists all the claims made at Neuburg A/D, which is titled "Squadron Strafing Report, 357", Garlich's line has a ? in pencil on the left side (all the other entries have "OK" in pencil), and in pencil on the right, "film so dull, can't see A/C".

Now I need to find my copy of the full VCB report, somewhere on my hard drive.

Enjoy!

Frank.
__________________
Civilization is the most fragile ecology of all.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 30th September 2017, 04:48
Frank Olynyk Frank Olynyk is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,406
Frank Olynyk is on a distinguished road
Re: USAAF Claims for Me 163s

OK, found the VCB report. I digitized it on Feb 15, 2007. It would appear to be box 189 or 190 of RG 18, Entry 7A.

The title is "Joint Victory Credits Board, 65th, 66th and 67th Fighter Wings, Confirmation of Victory Credits Board". This is Report 7, and Garlich's entry is line item 32, on the second page of the report. It is noted as 355th FG, 357th FS, on 23 Feb 1945. The claim is noted as one destroyed, the award is noted as one destroyed, the Type E/A is noted as "Me163 grd" and the Place is "Neuburg A/D". Remarks noted as "Confirmed." This is the original report, dated 20 March 1945, not "A True Copy".

So we have the interesting situation that the combat report claims an U/I T/E aircraft on the ground, which becomes a Me 163 on the ground in the VCB report, and then a Me 163 in the air in the extract posted by Peter. But I have to go with the original report in College Park, NARA II.

Enjoy!

Frank.
__________________
Civilization is the most fragile ecology of all.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 30th September 2017, 10:21
Peter Randall's Avatar
Peter Randall Peter Randall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maubeuge, France
Posts: 162
Peter Randall
Re: USAAF Claims for Me 163s

Thanks Frank. Just goes to show what an absolute jungle this can be! Unfortunately Bob Garlich is no longer with us so he can't shed any light on the subject. However, the VCB document that I posted was given to me by Bob at one of the reunions, and if I remember correctly, and I'm sure that I do, he said that the 163 was landing, but still "in the air" when he hit it. Guess that we will never really know the true circumstances.

Peter
__________________
US 8th Air Force Little Friends Site
www.littlefriends.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 30th September 2017, 10:54
Stig Jarlevik Stig Jarlevik is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,828
Stig Jarlevik will become famous soon enough
Re: USAAF Claims for Me 163s

Thanks Peter/Frank

Reading again the combat report quoted by Frank, I cannot see how this Me 163 suddenly can be landing. There is nothing in the combat report which suggest anything like that.

I have always interpreted T/E to stand for a twin-engined aircraft. Since the Me 163 was far from a twin-engined aircraft I can then only assume that Me 163 was the final interpretation of the gun-camera film?

Finally, if Neuburg in this case is the same as Neuburg an der Donau, I have not heard of any Me 163 ever being based down there. This attack must also have been among the first made against this airfield.

Cheers
Stig
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 30th September 2017, 18:50
Peter Randall's Avatar
Peter Randall Peter Randall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maubeuge, France
Posts: 162
Peter Randall
Re: USAAF Claims for Me 163s

I've asked Bill Marshall if he has any take on this one.
Peter
__________________
US 8th Air Force Little Friends Site
www.littlefriends.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 30th September 2017, 22:25
Karoband Karoband is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 829
Karoband will become famous soon enoughKaroband will become famous soon enough
Re: USAAF Claims for Me 163s

Hello all,

Just a correction on the oft-misquoted rank of Rolf Glogner. From Ransom & Cammann, Me 163 Rocket Interceptor Volume Two, (2003) p.274:

"Uffz. Rolf Glogner: (23) 'I shot down a Mosquito on 16 March 1945. In this case, Goring should have awarded me a medal and given me a promotion and special leave. Instead, I received confirmation of my victories in Russia. Because, up to that time, I had only received the gold Frontflug-Spange fur Jaeger, I was retrospectively awarded an EK II. Shortly afterwards I was promoted to Feldwebel.'"

best regards,

Jim Geens

P.S. I'm sorry. This post was meant for Chris' thread on the Mosquito Loss 10 April 1945.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 1st October 2017, 00:00
drgondog's Avatar
drgondog drgondog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 909
drgondog is on a distinguished road
Re: USAAF Claims for Me 163s

I'll try to answer all the 355th questions.

First, neither Garlich nor Allen received an aerial victory credit during WWII by either *th AF VCB or USAF Study 85.

The Me 163 claim by Garlich was a credited Me 263 at Neuberg A/d. The 355th awards for ground destruction on 2/23/45 was 14 Destroyed, 12 Damaged. None of the damaged Me 262s burned and only Garlich's 163 was observed burning.

Allen's 3-2-45 claims for 109s were disallowed because a.) no witness and b.) film was bad. Simply no confirmation possible.
__________________
" The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nightfighter claims in Febr.1945 Peter Kassak Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 2 6th April 2013 10:12
U.S Loss Reports for crashes in the UK Melvin Brownless Allied and Soviet Air Forces 4 6th August 2012 12:49
V-1 bombs shot down by U.S. Air Force strafer Allied and Soviet Air Forces 12 3rd April 2010 03:31
Percentage of Verifiable Victories of Various Aces –Updates & Recommendations Rob Romero Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 25 9th March 2010 02:39
Percentage of Verifiable Victories of Various Aces –Updates & Recommendations Rob Romero Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 0 30th September 2006 09:05


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:57.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net