|
Japanese and Allied Air Forces in the Far East Please use this forum to discuss the Air War in the Far East. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
B-29 Formations
Can anyone tell me if there was any set formation pattern for B-29s when flying over Japan or enemy territory in general? I am certain 20th AAF procedure differed from that of the tight combat box formations flown by '17s and '24s in the ETO.
I am sure I have read they flew in loose formations and only closed in when near or over the target areas, or perhaps where enemy aircraft were expected, and that after hitting their targets, flew home in no particular order and sometimes alone? Thank you |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: B-29 Formations
From images I have see it look like triangle formation but also steped formation. Best info could find in Osprey "B-29 Hunters of the JAAF".
__________________
Srecko Bradic Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com/forum Owner: www.sreckobradic.com Owner: www.warplanes-zine.com Email: srecko.warplane@gmail.com Skype: sreckobradic Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/LetLet...s/308234397758 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: B-29 Formations
Two of my favourite books on the B-29 campaign against Japan are:
Birds From Hell, by Wilbur Morrison Blankets Of Fire, by Kenneth Werrell. Morrison served with the 58th Bomb Wing from April '44 to October '45. It's a personal account of his war and as such is one of the very few that deals with the B-29 campaign. Fascinating reading. 'Blankets' is more the historical analysis of the development of the B-29, the decisions and actions of the Bomb Wings involved in the campaign and the adjustments that had to be made by the USAAF for waging strategic war in the Pacific. So between both books one gets an excellent picture of the aerial offensive. For all it's advanced technology the B-29 was pretty much a nightmare to fly, always the risk of engine fire or crashing on takeoff due to the mission overload. Units didn't fly in the strict wing box formation of Europe, but rather in the old flight formation of three, four vic's making a diamond shape, each vic slightly higher or lower than the others. This allowed for greater fuel economy and lowere pilot strain on such long haul missions. As the formation approached Japan the formation would tighten up into a loose box. Given the B-29's greater firepower and gun area coverage this was considered a good balance. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: B-29 Formations
Thanks again guys. I will check out the first book you mentioned, Jim.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: B-29 Formations
Do either of the B-29 books mentioned above list losses and causes?
It seems to be very difficult to get hold of any published data on USAAF combat losses in the Far East and it is rarely included in books covering units, aircraft and campaigns. This is in stark contrast to studies of USAAF operations over Europe. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: B-29 Formations
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: B-29 Formations
For B-29 ops from China/India in 1944 see my article:
www.warbirdforum.com/elusive.htm Scroll through the Chinese and earlier American sections to the fourth part on B-29s. In day raids they generally flew three-plane sections and overall formations not dissimilar to those used in Europe. However, many raids were at night. Rick Dunn |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: B-29 Formations
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
8th Air Force Formations and PFF | Pathfinder | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 3 | 31st January 2006 17:03 |
8th Air Force Formations and PFF | Pathfinder | Allied and Soviet Air Forces | 0 | 30th January 2006 21:11 |
German Claims in Poland 1939 | Marius | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 56 | 12th September 2005 17:39 |
Discussion on the air war in Tunisia | Christer Bergström | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 14 | 1st April 2005 18:47 |
Tunisian losses | Juha | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 29 | 25th March 2005 13:56 |