|
Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Focke-Wulf Fw 190A poor high-altitude performance
The poor performance of the Fw 190A above 20,000 feet is well-known. As best I could ascertain, the reason for this limitation was ineffective superchargers for the Fw 190's BMW radial engine. The Republic P-47 Thunderbolt had excellent high-altitude performance with its radial engine, which was attributed to a large degree to its supercharger. The Germans seem to have effective superchargers for their inline Daimler-Benz and Junkers Jumo engines, so I am curious why an effective supercharger was not able to be developed for the BMW radial engine. (Searching on Google was fruitless for me.) Am I missing the real reason(s) for the poor performance of the Fw 190A at altitude?
Thanks, Kenneth |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Focke-Wulf Fw 190A poor high-altitude performance
The P-47 was the happy recipient of a lot of research and experiments by the USAAF with turbo-superchargers (exhaust driven) and was, therefore, ready for high-altitude combat.
The Germans, on the other hand, never anticipated the WWII high altitude combat that resulted from the USAAF’s high altitude bombing campaign. Recall, that the DB 601 engine was developed in the late 19030s when medium altitude combat was the expected norm. The DB engines were not that great over 20k feet, hence the eventual addition of GM-1 to the DB 601 and 605 for high altitude performance and eventually, the make-shift AS types. This was also true of the RR Merlin which did not have effective high-altitude performance until the Merlin 61(?) in the Spitfire IX. Superchargers for in-line liquid cooled engines were much simpler to develop than for radial engines, hence all the work by the US on the turbo superchargers—it was tedious work. The Germans never made that much effort for radials until the Fw 190 experiments which resulted in nothing for the BMW radials. It was simpler, easier and quicker to do the D-9, pending the Ta 152. Bottom line: the need was not anticipated and money for experiments was always a big issue for the pre-war Luftwaffe. Goering and Hitler wanted a strong air force, now, not a few years down the road. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Focke-Wulf Fw 190A poor high-altitude performance
IIRC US Navy/USMC radial engine fighters (F4F, F6F, F4U) had similar performance drop offs to the 190A at high altitude.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Focke-Wulf Fw 190A poor high-altitude performance
It is not a function of radial engines. It is largely a matter of superchargers and the maximum compression ratio. All single-stage supercharger engines begin running out of power around 20000ft. The radial BMW 801 was no different to the inline Sabre, hence the problems with accepting the Typhoon into a Fighter Command that increasingly emphasised high-altitude performance. For performance at higher altitudes the US went to turbochargers, the UK to two-stage superchargers, the Germans to exotic fuel additives. This was partly a matter of available materials, turbochargers requiring exotic metals the Germans lacked; and available expertise, RR being particularly good with superchargers.
For additional altitude, aerodynamic advantage can be gained from larger wings, either by increased span or greater aspect ratio (span divided by mean chord, or span squared over wing area). The Fw 190 has a low aspect ratio wing, so loses out here. Consider the Ta 152H..... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Focke-Wulf Fw 190A poor high-altitude performance
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Focke-Wulf Fw 190A poor high-altitude performance
Focke Wulf and BMW planned to add the turbo charger but these developements never went beyond experimental stage. IIRC the only plane which reached more or less experimental service with the BMW turbo charged engine was the Ju 388.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Focke-Wulf Fw 190A poor high-altitude performance
And Allison did a two-stage supercharger, which saw production in the P-63, and postwar in the F-82.
It is worth pointing out that phrases such as "poor high-altitude performance" is only meaningful comparated to those aircraft with turbochargers or two-stage superchargers. The Fw 190 was superior to the Yaks and Lavochkins it faced on the Eastern front, although curiously it does not seem to have gained the same reputation in the East that it had in the West. A supercharger design is set to a given pressure, and hence a given fixed throttle height. Witness the "cropped" LF series of Merlins, which gave the Spitfire LF Mk.V possibly the highest low-level climb rate of any WW2 service fighter, but reached its maximum power at only 5000ft. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Focke-Wulf Fw 190A poor high-altitude performance
Kenneth,
I suggest you take a look at: Focke-Wulf Fw 190A Die Ersten Baureihen Dietmar Hermann, Ulrich Leverenz & Eberhard Weber Aviatic Verlag, 2002 3-925505-72-5 Laminated, 222p Focke-Wulf Fw 190 "Long Nose" An illustrated history of the Fw 190 D series Dietmar Hermann Schiffer Publishing, 2003 0-7643-1876-4 Hard Cover, 206p Focke-Wulf Höhenjäger Vom ersten Höhenjäger zur Fw 190 H Jet & Prop Typen-Chronik 6 Spezial Dietmar Hermann VDM, 2002 3-925480-XX-X Softcover, 132p The first title is also available in English as published by Schiffer (I usually by original German if I have a choice). These three books cover your questions regarding the Fw 190 and high altitude performance. Issues as design philosophy, impact of the RLM, engine and supercharger research are all covered. The Fw 190 was seen by Tank as a flexible frame for a work horse.
__________________
Ruy Horta 12 O'Clock High! And now I see with eye serene The very pulse of the machine; A being breathing thoughtful breath, A traveller between life and death; |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Focke-Wulf Fw 190A poor high-altitude performance
Quote:
Thanks for the book recommendations. I have Jerry Crandall's (Focke Wulf Fw 190 Dora Vol 1" on order and I am hoping it will cover the altitude issues that led from the Fw 190A to the Fw 190D. I'll see if I can find Dietmar Hermann's Fw 190 books. Kenneth |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Focke-Wulf Fw 190A poor high-altitude performance
Thanks to everyone who posted on this thread. I gained more insights into why the Fw 190A had poor performance above 20000 feet, why it was not initially considered a problem, and more books to read.
Kenneth |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Performance of the Fw 190A on the Deck? | Boomerang | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 173 | 11th August 2008 09:30 |
I'm seeking these 1/48 kits ! | jmarcpe | Wanted | 0 | 26th April 2008 17:41 |
Focke Wulf FW 190 D Camouflage & Markings Vol.2 | Rudi Penker | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 0 | 19th September 2007 19:14 |
Aircraft performance curves | Christer Bergström | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 17 | 19th November 2005 21:49 |
Low altitude tests: P-47 vs. Fw 190 | Six Nifty .50s | Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces | 4 | 20th April 2005 00:13 |