Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum  

Go Back   Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum > Discussion > Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces

Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces Please use this forum to discuss the German Luftwaffe and the Air Forces of its Allies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 6th July 2006, 15:45
Jerome Ribeiro Jerome Ribeiro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paris
Posts: 90
Jerome Ribeiro is on a distinguished road
Heavy Flak - 88 or 105 mm heavy guns

Hello Everyone,

During the Sitzkrieg then the Blitzkrieg, plenty of french bombers were shooted down by the heavy Flak unit equipped with with heavy guns (88 or 105 mm).

I need you support re the heavy guns utilized by the Flak at this time. Does anyone has photos or documentations especially on the caracteristics of the 88 and mostly the 105 mm gunneries?

Thanking you in anticipation
Regards
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 7th July 2006, 15:43
Boomerang Boomerang is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 165
Boomerang is on a distinguished road
Re: Heavy Flak - 88 or 105 mm heavy guns

Numerically, the 88mm flak was available in significantly larger numbers than the 105mm flak eg see:

http://www.feldgrau.com/weaprod.html

According to a very old reference (Sweetman, Schweinfurt Disaster in the Skies) for the Flak 38 105 mm weapon weight of shell = 25 kg, muzzle velocity = 870 m/sec, range = 40,000 feet, rate of fire = 12 rounds per minute.

Not a lot to go on, but perhaps the above could be a starting point.

Regards

Boomerang
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 7th July 2006, 17:27
Ruy Horta's Avatar
Ruy Horta Ruy Horta is offline
He who rules the forum...
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Amstelveen, The Netherlands
Posts: 1,474
Ruy Horta has disabled reputation
Re: Heavy Flak - 88 or 105 mm heavy guns

Was the 8.8 regarded as heavy FlaK, or medium?
__________________
Ruy Horta
12 O'Clock High!

And now I see with eye serene
The very pulse of the machine;
A being breathing thoughtful breath,
A traveller between life and death;
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 7th July 2006, 18:51
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is online now
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 5,813
Nick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura about
Re: Heavy Flak - 88 or 105 mm heavy guns

You'd find a lot of the answers in Edward Westerman's "Flak: German Anti-Aircraft Defenses, 1914–1945". University of Kansas 2001 (ISBN 0-7006-1420-6) now in soft cover as well.

Be warned however: I found this is a turgid and repetitive book (how many times per page can an author refer to "the german ground-based air defences" without driving his readers nuts?) but if you can wade through the verbal treacle, there are some useful data about guns here and there.

My other complaint (and Rabe Anton will hate me for this!) is that it's a book written by a professional historian bringing his academic technique to a field in which he doesn't have the background knowledge that a Luftwaffe/air warfare specialist would have. He dismissed the 1940 Blitzkrieg in about two sentences for example. Also, don't expect anything like an order of battle (IIRC he doesn't name a single Flak Division). All you get are total numbers of different weapons in service at particular points.
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 7th July 2006, 20:14
Jerome Ribeiro Jerome Ribeiro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paris
Posts: 90
Jerome Ribeiro is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Re: Heavy Flak - 88 or 105 mm heavy guns

All,

Thanks for your information provided on Flak weapons, especially those on the 105mm.

What stands for the suffixe number 38 just after the Flak eg 105mm Flak 38 and 39 or 88mm Flak 18, 36 and 38?
Is the model or the year of 1st batch of production?

cheers

Jerome
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 8th July 2006, 10:26
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is online now
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 5,813
Nick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura aboutNick Beale has a spectacular aura about
Re: Heavy Flak - 88 or 105 mm heavy guns

AFAIK it's just a model number. You see the same thing with tank guns and artillery pieces.
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 9th July 2006, 06:02
George Hopp's Avatar
George Hopp George Hopp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ottawa, CA
Posts: 830
George Hopp
Re: Heavy Flak - 88 or 105 mm heavy guns

There is an excellent book on the subject entitled "Flak" by H.A. Koch, printed in 1965 in German.

And, yes, the 18, 36, 37, etc. numbers after the calibre appear to indicate the year of introduction of that particular model. In the above book, page 41, it states: "The 8,8 cm-Flak 18 in its improved form reached the forces as 8,8 cm-Flak 36 (1937 with further technical improvements as 8,8 cm-Flak 37) and became the standard weapon of the heavy batteries."

Last edited by George Hopp; 9th July 2006 at 06:35.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10th July 2006, 02:43
Tony Williams Tony Williams is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 92
Tony Williams
Re: Heavy Flak - 88 or 105 mm heavy guns

There was some inconsistency over the German numbering system. They were restricted in developing new armaments after WW1, so up to the mid-30s often gave a spurious number like "18" to indicate that it had been developed during WW1 and was therefore permitted. In fact, the 8,8cm Flak 18 entered service in 1933, the Flak 36 was a modified version which came out three years later, the Flak 37 a further modification.

There were two very different 8,8cm Flak: the 18, 36 and 37 family all fired the same ammunition, the 41 fired much more powerful ammunition giving it a greater effective altitude.

The basic figures are these:

8,8 cm Flak 18, 36, 37: 9.4 kg shell at 820 m/s, effective ceiling 8,000 m

8,8, cm Flak 41: 9.4 kg at 1,000 m/s, effective ceiling 10,675 m

10,5 cm Flak 38, 39: 14.8 kg at 881 m/s, effective ceiling 9,450 m

All data from Hogg's 'German Artillery of WW2'.

Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and discussion forum
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10th July 2006, 03:39
George Hopp's Avatar
George Hopp George Hopp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ottawa, CA
Posts: 830
George Hopp
Re: Heavy Flak - 88 or 105 mm heavy guns

Quote:
There was some inconsistency over the German numbering system. They were restricted in developing new armaments after WW1, so up to the mid-30s often gave a spurious number like "18" to indicate that it had been developed during WW1 and was therefore permitted.
As I recall the original 88 did come out in 1918. So as I said above, the numbering appears to reflect the year the weapon became operational.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10th July 2006, 08:44
Tony Williams Tony Williams is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 92
Tony Williams
Re: Heavy Flak - 88 or 105 mm heavy guns

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Hopp
As I recall the original 88 did come out in 1918. So as I said above, the numbering appears to reflect the year the weapon became operational.
88mm had been a common German gun calibre for a long time - the first one being introduced in 1873. There were indeed 88mm guns in use during WW1, but the Flak 18 owed nothing to them. Its development was started in 1925, and the gun and ammunition were quite different from earlier guns - the only thing it shared in common was the calibre.

Similarly, the Luftwaffe's standard 7.9mm aircraft MGs at the start of WW2, the MG 15 and MG 17, were both 1930s developments. In contrast, the Army's MG 34 and MG 42 did reflect the dates of introduction.

Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and discussion forum
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
concrete flak towers around airfields: myth or reality? O.Menu Allied and Soviet Air Forces 1 15th October 2005 12:07
Concrete flak towers around airfields: myth or reality ? O.Menu Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 0 28th September 2005 21:26
Flak around Airfields? F10_Chainsaw Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces 16 16th May 2005 09:55


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:44.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net