PDA

View Full Version : Severe Overclaimers Vs. Reliable Claimers List


Rob Romero
4th January 2007, 09:51
Recently, I attempted to initiate a database of Historically Verifiable Victories (VV). Although some headway (especially with WWI German Aces) has been attained, the result, has not yet become what one might have hoped. Perhaps a more pragmatic approach would be to garner a sense of which aces were Reliable Vs. Exaggerated Claimants. Admittedly, as with Historically Verifiable Victories Thread, this would be an IMPERFECT and CONTROVERSIAL undertaking, however, eventually, and which much vetting, this avenue might garner some historical insight. To reduce my workload, I will keep this list EXCLUSIVE from the more concrete results obtained in the Historically Verifiable Victories (VV) Thread.

Alleged Heavy Overclaimers
352 Erich Hartmann –based on ‘research’ of Dimitri Khazanov
258 Walter Nowotny
224 Erich Rudorffer Afrika “Rudorffer's serious overclaims over the eastern front” Falsified Claims in Afrika?
173 Emil Lang
129 Walter Dahl –less than 100 credits according to J-Y Lorant
127 Walter Oesau
112 Kurt Bühlingen
99 Heinrich Bartels
94 Rudolf Muller
93 Sigfried Schnell
56 Helmut Wick
37 Thomas McGwire (Harry Brown (7) personally indicated McGwire scrambled, parachuted over base & claimed 3 kills he could not possibly have made!)
33 Erwin Sawallisch (Allegedly caught falsifying combats with schwarm in Afrika –may have subsequently killed himself -Source Hans Ring/Chris Shores)

JG2 in Afrika, JG5 , JG54 are some of the Luftwaffe Units Alleged to have had a licentious outlook on overclaiming.

Alleged Reliable Claimers
-Keep in mind that few pilots even come near to 100% reliablility in their claims!
221 Heinz Bär?
158 Hans-Joachim Marseille
103 Adolf Galland (Don Caldwell alleges that Galland deliberately overclaimed on at least one occaision)
102 Egon Mayer
101 Josef Priller (Kept meticulous record of combats apparently researched and largely verified by Johnny Johnson (38 )
35 Bruno Stolle

Thanx,
Rob Romero

P.S. On a related note, on 9 Feb 43 Erich Rudorffer claimed to have shot down 8 aircraft (6 P-40s and 2 P-38s) American records do not substatiate his P-38 claims –how about the P-40s?

Andrew Arthy
4th January 2007, 13:57
Hi Rob,

The following is from The Focke-Wulf FW 190 in North Africa book, written by by Morten Jessen and myself:

----------------
9 February 1943
At 13:45 six II./JG 2 pilots scrambled to intercept incoming enemy aircraft. A formation of four P-39s of the 81st FG was flying a reconnaissance mission north of Ousseltia and east of Kairouan, escorted by nine P-40Fs of GC II/5. 16 minutes after take-off, the Fw 190s attacked the P-40s, and in the engagement Sgt. Chef Denaix was hit and force-landed 24 km east of Kasserine. During this fight, Oblt. Bühligen claimed two P-40s destroyed, as did Ofw. Goltzsch, and these four victories occurred between 13:51 and 13:55, three south of Djebel bou Dabouss and one south of Djebel Rihane.[1] (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=34759#_ftn1) GC II/5 lost at least three P-40Fs in this combat, and Adjudant Chef Verrier, Sgt. Chef Denaix and Sgt. Chef Borg did not return from the mission, although no one was killed. The French pilots Hebrard, Moret and Denaix claimed a Fw 190 each, but II./JG 2 had no losses in the aerial engagement.[2] (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=34759#_ftn2)


[1] (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=34759#_ftnref1) The latter location is not certain.

[2] (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=34759#_ftnref2) GC II/5 War Diary, pp.38-39; Film C. 2027/I; Shores, Ring & Hess, Fighters Over Tunisia, pp.199-200




----------------

I posted the following in an earlier thread about II./J.G. 2 overclaiming in Tunisia:

----------------
II./J.G. 2 and Overclaiming/Falsification
Most of the suspect II./J.G. 2 claims in Tunisia occurred while they were based at Kairouan airfield in central Tunisia in January and the first half of February 1943. II./J.G. 2 pilots based at Kairouan during the period of overclaiming included: Bühligen, Rudorffer, Werner, Karch, Schülze, Goltzsche, Engelbrecht, von Farnholz, Übelbacher, Sonntag, Gäbler, Weißgruber, Jacobs, and Marx.

II./J.G. 2 was usually the only Luftwaffe unit based at Kairouan, and it was certainly the only fighter unit based there (except for the Stab J.G. 53 during the Kasserine operation). They were 150 to 200 km from the main German headquarters in northern and southern Tunisia, and reported to the Fliegerführer Tunis once a day, in the evening. The II./J.G. 2 detachment was usually at the most fifteen pilots (for example, on 5 February 1943 there were 13 pilots in the Kairouan detachment, and ten FW 190s).

Thus it was the perfect environment if the II./J.G. 2 pilots wanted to falsify claims. Rudorffer was the highest ranked officer, and he was surrounded by pilots who had been together in the Gruppe for a while.

Please note I am not saying that falsification of victories by II./J.G. 2 did occur, I’m just suggesting that rarely would a German fighter unit be in such a good position to submit false victory claims. The chances of discovery were very slim, so long as you had the trust of your fellow pilots.

Gaps in the American Records
This is a convenient excuse for the II./J.G. 2 pilots, but it’s simply not true. The 1st Fighter Group has complete records of its operations in the period of II./J.G. 2 over claiming. I have the 14th FG microfilms, and although their records aren’t as detailed as those of the 1st FG, there is enough information to be able to match up claims and losses. Unfortunately I’ve not seen the 82nd FG records, so I generally rely on Shores, Ring & Hess for their Tunisian operations (which is one reason why Morten and I weren’t too definite about II./J.G. 2 overclaiming in our book).

Martin Gleeson mentions the 3rd PRG with P-38s in Tunisia. This is a valid point, but generally II./J.G. 2 was claiming multiple P-38 kills, and the PRG units flew singly, eliminating it as a possibility in most cases.

Rudorffer on the Eastern Front
As for Rudorffer on the Eastern Front, I’m no expert, but I know that in at least one combat he and his wingman were very optimistic with their claims. I should note that I don’t wish to accuse him of anything (I believe he is still alive). Morten and I wrote to him in 2001 asking if he wanted to provide information for our book, but he declined. We wish we could have got his side of the story.
----------------

I would like to take this opportunity to defend the reputation of II./J.G. 2 in Tunisia. In the early months of 1943 II./J.G. 2 enjoyed great success against the Americans in central Tunisia on many occasions. There were only a few days when overclaiming of an unacceptable level occurred.

The days of serious overclaiming were 9 February, 14 February, 15 February, and 12 March 1943. On these days II./J.G. 2 claimed 44 victories, for which there are only six known Allied losses.

The Gruppe made around 130 victory claims in Tunisia, so this means that around 85 of the claims made were genuine.

Aside from the four days mentioned above, all other claims submitted by II./J.G. 2 in Tunisia were relatively accurate. For example, on 2, 3 and 4 February 1943 II./J.G. 2 claimed 21 victories for 13 known Allied losses, which I consider very acceptable.

I hope the above is of interest.

Cheers,
Andrew A.

Rob Romero
5th January 2007, 01:18
Arty, thanks for your reply. However, you don’t address the issue of Rudorfer’s Claims on 9 Feb 43. Rudorffer claimed to have shot down 8 aircraft (6 P-40s and 2 P-38s) within 23 minutes (13:59-14:22) –as the longest gap between claims was 15 minutes, it is manifest that these occurred within a single mission! American records do not substatiate his P-38 claims –how about the P-40s?



09.02.43 Oblt. Erich Rüdorffer 6./JG 2 Curtiss P-40 £ 5 km. S.E. Djebel Ousseltia: 1.500 m. 13.59 Film C. 2027/I Anerk: Nr.81
09.02.43 Oblt. Erich Rüdorffer 6./JG 2 Curtiss P-40 £ S. Djebel Ousseltia: 500 m. 14.00 Film C. 2027/I Anerk: Nr.82
09.02.43 Oblt. Erich Rüdorffer 6./JG 2 Curtiss P-40 £ Djebel Ousseltia: 200 m. 14.01 Film C. 2027/I Anerk: Nr.83
09.02.43 Oblt. Erich Rüdorffer 6./JG 2 Curtiss P-40 £ 12 km. N.W. Pribon: 200 m. 14.02 Film C. 2027/I Anerk: Nr.84
09.02.43 Oblt. Erich Rüdorffer 6./JG 2 Curtiss P-40 £ 10 km. S.E. Kerra: 300 m. 14.04 Film C. 2027/I Anerk: Nr.85
09.02.43 Oblt. Erich Rüdorffer 6./JG 2 Curtiss P-40 £ 15 km. S.E. Kerra: tiefflug 14.06 Film C. 2027/I Anerk: Nr.86
09.02.43 Oblt. Erich Rüdorffer 6./JG 2 P-38 £ 5 km. E. Djebel Barbraü: 6.000 m. 14.21 Film C. 2027/I Anerk: Nr.87
09.02.43 Oblt. Erich Rüdorffer 6./JG 2 P-38 £ 5 km. W. Djebel Barbraü: 6.000 m. 14.22 Film C. 2027/I Anerk: Nr.88

Thanx,
Rob Romero

Andrew Arthy
5th January 2007, 05:40
Hi Rob,

I actually did address the 9 February 1943 combat. Here it is again, this time with Allied P-40 losses on this date in boldface:

-----------------
9 February 1943
At 13:45 six II./JG 2 pilots scrambled to intercept incoming enemy aircraft. A formation of four P-39s of the 81st FG was flying a reconnaissance mission north of Ousseltia and east of Kairouan, escorted by nine P-40Fs of GC II/5. 16 minutes after take-off, the Fw 190s attacked the P-40s, and in the engagement Sgt. Chef Denaix was hit and force-landed 24 km east of Kasserine. During this fight, Oblt. Bühligen claimed two P-40s destroyed, as did Ofw. Goltzsch, and these four victories occurred between 13:51 and 13:55, three south of Djebel bou Dabouss and one south of Djebel Rihane.[1] (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=34759#_ftn1) GC II/5 lost at least three P-40Fs in this combat, and Adjudant Chef Verrier, Sgt. Chef Denaix and Sgt. Chef Borg did not return from the mission, although no one was killed. The French pilots Hebrard, Moret and Denaix claimed a Fw 190 each, but II./JG 2 had no losses in the aerial engagement.[2] (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=34759#_ftn2)

[1] (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=34759#_ftnref1) The latter location is not certain.
[2] (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=34759#_ftnref2) GC II/5 War Diary, pp.38-39; Film C. 2027/I; Shores, Ring & Hess, Fighters Over Tunisia, pp.199-200

------------------

So three P-40 losses in the combat on 9 February 1943 in which Rudorffer claimed six P-40s shot down.

Cheers,
Andrew A.

Rob Romero
5th January 2007, 06:07
Thanks Andrew,

In your original post, you only mention the 2 claimed by Bühligen and Goltzsch each, so I guess that with Rüdorffer’s 6 claims, II/JG2 actually shot down 3 of the 10 claims they made?

Thanx,
Rob

Hohentwiel
5th January 2007, 09:02
[1] (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=34759#_ftnref1) The latter location is not certain.
[2] (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=34759#_ftnref2) GC II/5 War Diary, pp.38-39; Film C. 2027/I; Shores, Ring & Hess, Fighters Over Tunisia, pp.199-200


Who tells us that these sources are correct?

dora9forever
1st February 2007, 22:20
on helmut wick ,3 spitfires 0n 6th nov 40 . but no RAF losses submit these.
he did shoot down a hurricane,southampton,sgt adairt

Rob Romero
15th February 2007, 05:34
-Update -Addition to Reliable Claimers Oskar Romm (92/79EVV)

92 Oskar Romm -On the basis of 5 Feb 44 mission in which he claimed 1 Soviet Yak & 5 Bostons -Yak shot down & 6/8 Bostons claimed by JG51 were shot down. On the basis of this single mission I will assign him a VERY PRELIMINARY claim reliability ESTIMATE of 79.2% and Estimate his Verified victories @ (79EVV)

Recently, I attempted to initiate a database of Historically Verifiable Victories (VV). Although some headway (especially with WWI German Aces) has been attained, the result, has not yet become what one might have hoped. Perhaps a more realistic approach would be to garner a sense of which aces were reliable versus exaggerated claimants. Admittedly, as with Historically Verifiable Victories Thread, the this would be an IMPERFECT and CONTROVERSIAL undertaking, however, eventually, and which much vetting, this avenue might garner some historical insight. To reduce my workload, I will keep this list EXCLUSIVE from the more concrete results obtained in the Historically Verifiable Victories (VV) Thread.

Alleged Heavy Overclaimers
352 Erich Hartmann –based on ‘research’ of Dimitri Khazanov
258 Walter Nowotny
224 Erich Rudorffer Afrika “Rudorffer's serious overclaims over the eastern front” Falsified Claims in Afrika?
173 Emil Lang
129 Walter Dahl –less than 100 credits according to J-Y Lorant
127 Walter Oesau
112 Kurt Bühlingen
99 Heinrich Bartels
94 Rudolf Muller
93 Sigfried Schnell
56 Helmut Wick
37 Thomas McGwire (Harry Brown (7) personally related that McGwire scrambled, parachuted over base & claimed 3 kills he could not possibly have made!)
33 Erwin Sawallisch (Allegedly caught falsifying combats with schwarm in Afrika –may have subsequently killed himself -Source Hans Ring/Chris Shores)

JG2 in Afrika, JG5 , JG54 are some of the Luftwaffe Units Alleged to have had a licentious attitude over overclaiming.

Alleged Reliable Claimers
(Keep in mind that few pilots even come near to 100% reliablility in their claims)
221 Heinz Bär (Some overclaims)
158 Hans-Joachim Marseille
103 Adolf Galland (Don Caldwell alleges that Galland deliberately overclaimed on at least one occaision)
102 Egon Mayer
101 Josef Priller (Kept meticulous record of combats apparently researched and largely verified by Johnny Johnson (38 )
92 Oskar Romm -On the basis of 5 Feb 44 mission in which he claimed 1 Soviet Yak & 5 Bostons -Yak shot down & 6/8 Bostons claimed by JG51 were shot down. On the basis of this single mission I will assign him a VERY PRELIMINARY claim reliability ESTIMATE of 79.2% and Estimate his Verified victories @ (79EVV)
35 Bruno Stolle

Rob Romero
15th February 2007, 05:46
Gotta be more careful before I post

Oskar Romm (73EVV)

Csaba B. Stenge
15th February 2007, 17:23
Two of my favourites from the eastern front, Lipfert and Setz seems to me quite reliable without heavy overclaims (and Setz had very good sorties/kills rate as well). OFC I have just sporadic Soviet losses, but sometimes have good accounts from areas, where they fought.

I do hope, Heinrich Setz's full diary will be published once.

Laurent Rizzotti
15th February 2007, 18:50
I have ever been doubtful about pilots claiming score of kills in some minutes. The probability of overclaiming is here in my own opinion more important, because I think most of these pilots just hit an enemy aircraft and immediatly chased another, thinking the first to be destroyed.

If you watch the record of Lipfert, he scored 3 victories in a sortie on 2 Dec 1943 (in 16 minutes), maybe 3 in the same sortie on 7 May 44 (one at 8h49, two at 9h40-45, may also have been two sorties) and 3 in one sortie on 19 July 44 (in 5 minutes). That is only 2 and maybe 3 triples on 203 claims (all known).

Now consider Rudorffer. He claimed 3 victories in one sortie on 7 Sep 40 (in 13 minutes), 3 on 19 Aug 41 (in 16 minutes), 3 on 21 Sep 1941 (in 15 minutes), 8 on 9 Feb 43 (in 22 minutes), 6 or 7 on 15 Feb 43 (6 in 15 minutes, one more 40 minutes later), 3 in the morning of 24 Aug 43 (in 7 minutes) and 5 in the afternoon (in 4 minutes), 5 on 14 Sep 43 (in 5 minutes), 7 on 11 Oct 43 (in 7 minutes), 13 on 6 Nov 11 (in 19 minutes), 6 on 7 Apr 44 (in 16 minutes), 3 on 28 Apr 44 (in 3 minutes), 5 on 3 July 44 (in 4 minutes), 6 on 26 Jul 44 (in 28 minutes), 3 on 27 Jul 44 (in 6 minutes), 3 on 17 Aug 43 (in 11 minutes), 5 on 25 Aug 43 (in 11 minutes), 4 on 6 Sep 44 (in 5 minutes), 3 on 17 Sep 44 (in 6 minutes), 6 on 25 Sep 44 (in 14 minutes), 7 on 10 Oct 44 (in 18 minutes), 4 on 22 Oct 44 (in 5 minutes) and 9 on 28 Oct 44 (in 10 minutes). I know 211 of his 224 claims, and of these 211, 120 or 121 were claimed in sorties where he made more than 3 claims.

By the way it proves nothing, Marseille has been studied in depth and was not an heavy overclaimer but claimed 82 of his 158 victories in sorties with 3 kills of more.

But without more data I will thrust more a pilot who claimed more often a small number of victories.

Rob Romero
15th February 2007, 23:07
Laurence -nice to hear from you again -did you notice I used your proportional method to estimate Oskar Romm’s (EVV) at 73? ;-)

Severe Overclaimers Vs. Reliable Claimers List

-Update Helmut Lipfert (203) & Heinrich Setz (138)

Recently, I attempted to initiate a database of Historically Verifiable Victories (VV). Although some headway (especially with WWI German Aces) has been attained, the result, has not yet become what one might have hoped. Perhaps a more realistic approach would be to garner a sense of which aces were reliable versus exaggerated claimants. Admittedly, as with Historically Verifiable Victories Thread, the this would be an IMPERFECT and CONTROVERSIAL undertaking, however, eventually, and with much vetting, this avenue might garner some historical insight. To reduce my workload, I will keep this list EXCLUSIVE of the more concrete results obtained in the Historically Verifiable Victories (VV) Thread.

Alleged Heavy Overclaimers
352 Erich Hartmann -based on ‘research’ of Dimitri Khazanov
258 Walter Nowotny -as per Dimitri Khazanov
224 Erich Rudorffer Afrika “Rudorffer's serious overclaims over the eastern front” -Falsified Claims in Afrika? ~120 of 211 documented victories were claimed in sorties where he claimed 3 or more victories.
173 Emil Lang
129 Walter Dahl -less than 100 credits according to J-Y Lorant
127 Walter Oesau
112 Kurt Bühlingen
99 Heinrich Bartels
94 Rudolf Muller
93 Sigfried Schnell
56 Helmut Wick -1/5? claims on 6 Nov 40 are VV.
37 Thomas McGwire (Harry Brown (7) personally related that McGwire scrambled, parachuted over base & claimed 3 kills he could not possibly have made!)
33 Erwin Sawallisch (Allegedly caught falsifying combats with schwarm in Afrika –may have subsequently killed himself -Source Hans Ring/Chris Shores)

JG2 in Afrika, JG5 , JG54 are some of the Luftwaffe Units Alleged to have had a licentious attitude over overclaiming.

Alleged Reliable Claimers
(Be Mindful that few pilots even come near to 100% reliablility in their claims)
221 Heinz Bär (Some overclaims)
203 Helmut Lipfert -his combat memoirs are a MUST READ!
158 Hans-Joachim Marseille -that he often scored multiple victories in a matter of minutes places the magnitude of his accomplishments in an even greater light.
138 Heinrich Setz -good sorties/kills ratio as well
103 Adolf Galland (Don Caldwell alleges that Galland deliberately overclaimed on at least one occaision)
102 Egon Mayer
101 Josef Priller (Kept meticulous record of combats apparently researched and largely verified by Johnny Johnson (38 )
92 Oskar Romm -On the basis of 5 Feb 44 mission in which he claimed 1 Soviet Yak & 5 Bostons -Yak shot down & 6/8 Bostons claimed by JG51 were shot down. On the basis of this single mission I will assign him a VERY PRELIMINARY claim reliability ESTIMATE of 79.2% and Estimate his Verified Victories @ (79EVV)
35 Bruno Stolle

Nokose
15th February 2007, 23:18
Rob, After reading the Russian story of the 05Feb44 it sounds like Romm might have gotten at least 4 of the Bostons but without seeing Romm, Josten and Stroinigg's reports who knows. His 09:04 attack was probably the one fended off by the gunners of Rud's Boston who claimed a shoot down of a FW190. Hans Stroingg's attack hit when they had used up all there ammo. Don't know how that ratio would fit.

Rob Romero
19th February 2007, 18:29
Enjoy,

Rob Romero

Klaus Schiffler
20th February 2007, 02:36
The list contains no names of Soviet, Japanese or Italian aces who were notorious in their overclaiming.

Rob Romero
20th February 2007, 04:56
1) Keep in mind that my primary interest is Luftwaffe Aces.

2) The list is available for your edification, but it is also an invitation. If you have specific individuals/infomration in mind, please feel free to contribute.

Rob Romero
24th March 2007, 19:14
See Attatchment

-Rob Romero

Mark R.
21st February 2011, 15:13
I must admit to being intrigued by the GC II/5 war diary reference. The 31st Fighter Group, which apparently had "control" of all fighter aircraft at Telepte, recorded the following message dated 091450Z Feb 43 about the French squadron which it forwarded to XII Air Support Command: "Air Operation #5 - Nine P-40s of the Lafayette Escadrille led by Lt Tremolet, Up 1315, escorted four P-39s on recon mission. Eight P-40s down 1435, one a/c and pilot not yet returned. Pilots were Lt Tremolet, Lt Hebrard, Lt Boudier, S/Sgt Denaix (NYR), M/S Verrier, M/S Casenobe, M/S Graf, Bou Dabous [sic? Cannot figure that out - Borg?]. Four enemy aircraft dived on P-40s, followed by three others. P-40s at 5,000 feet, e/a at 8,000 ft. Lt Hebrard followed one FW-190 attacking a P-40, and was in turn followed by a FW-190 which overshot him and executed a climbing right turn. Lt Hebrard opened fire at this e/a at 125 yards, the FW-190 diving out of control, showing much white smoke and was seen to crash. The pilot did not bail out. Lt Hebrard claims 1 FW-190 destroyed. The balance of the e/a broke off and headed in the direction of Kairouan. One P-40 was found to be missing after the engagement, but circumstances are not known, the combat occurred between Djebel Hannekal and Djebel Chacerour. Report light flak near Sbikka. Our casualties one a/c and pilot NYR. Enemy casualties one FW-190. Weather broken scattered clouds at 5,000 feet, ceiling very high."

SECOND MESSAGE dated 091850Z Feb 1943 - "Reference todays report on Air Operation #5. S/Sgt Denaix reported NYR has returned 1745 hours. Slight foot wound. Will have PD claim on FW-190. Further report will follow."

Will have to admit the discrepancies are puzzling, but sometimes wartime documents are not updated. Seems that any link between a French P-40 squadron and a newly arrived USAAF Spitfire Group would be tenuous at best. But the only way the French could report to XIII Air Support Command would be through an American unit.

ONE ALIBI - Bou Dabous is near Cap Bon. I think the person typing up the report added the destination of the reconnaissance flight "to Bou Dabous" before typing in the last name of the French pilots. Then he got flustered and forgot to type in "to".

SECOND ALIBI - US report lists French pilots by abbreviation of US equivalent ranks: M/S = Master Sergeant and S/Sgt = Staff Sergeant.

Andrew Arthy
22nd February 2011, 01:55
Hi Mark,

The French pilots involved were:

Lieutenant TREMOLET
Adjudant-chef CASENOBE
Lieutenant HEBRARD
Lieutenant BOUDIER
Sergent-chef BORG
Adjudant-chef MORET
Adjudant-chef GRAS
Adjudant-chef VERRIER
Sergent-chef DENAIX

Cheers,
Andrew A.

Air War Publications - www.airwarpublications.com (http://www.airwarpublications.com)

Mark R.
22nd February 2011, 04:02
Andrew, I can see where the Americans spelled a couple of names wrong. I guess that can happen even if you are on the same airfield. Many thanks. I am orienting most of my current research on mission reports with unit histories as a backup. I have found the former more detailed, especially in the case of the 1st, 52d and 14th Fighter Groups. THe 31st is not so bad at times and the 33d is not very well documented in the former category. I am looking forward to June when I can head back to the National Archives to begin collecting material on the 12th AF bomber groups, photo recon, and the observation squadrons.

Sincerely,

Mark

Kutscha
22nd February 2011, 12:44
Who is this Thomas McGwire ?

yogybär
22nd February 2011, 13:41
Kutscha, you know google? It helps you even with "w" and "ui" ;):

http://www.waffenhq.de/biographien/biographien/mcguire.html

John Beaman
22nd February 2011, 15:44
I do not know how many of you have read The First Team and the Guadalcanal Campaign, but it is worth a read. It is meticulously researched and written in an easy style despite all the detail. The author often matches up individual names in combat from both sides.

It is also intriguing that both sides, the JNAF, USMC and USN fighter pilots were consistently overclaimers, often by 50-75%. It is amazing to read how many claims for Betty" type bombers were made and credited and that so many damaged ones made it back to base considering its reputation as the "Type 1 lighter".