Quote:
Originally Posted by Stig Jarlevik
Guys
Since no one has anything to say vs Harrison's statement that WNr 5329 was PG+BW I have from previous statements (I hope...) that STKZ as WNr 5328... 
Annoying I know...even to me.... 
GRM has (as always) an impressive 'future' for this individual
Thanks
Stig |
Hi Stig,
According
http://www.stammkennzeichen.de/index.php?pge=search and Peter van Gogh list (ex LEMB Stkz data list) WNr.5329 was PG+BW.
Note:
PG+BO was WNr.5296 then comes PG+BQ with WNr.5323 in Gogh list.
Stammkennzeichen list is a little bit different.
For them, PG+BR/5299 then PG+BS/5300 then PG+BT/5326 ...
Harrison's statement is correct according these two lists.
Cheers, Franck.