me109E1 or 3

[Stig Jarlevik]

Guys

Since no one has anything to say vs Harrison's statement that WNr 5329 was PG+BW I have from previous statements (I hope...) that STKZ as WNr 5328...
Annoying I know...even to me....

GRM has (as always) an impressive 'future' for this individual

Thanks
Stig

[ouidjat]

Originally Posted by Stig Jarlevik

Guys

Since no one has anything to say vs Harrison's statement that WNr 5329 was PG+BW I have from previous statements (I hope...) that STKZ as WNr 5328...
Annoying I know...even to me....

GRM has (as always) an impressive 'future' for this individual

Thanks
Stig

Hi Stig,

According http://www.stammkennzeichen.de/index.php?pge=search and Peter van Gogh list (ex LEMB Stkz data list) WNr.5329 was PG+BW.
Note:
PG+BO was WNr.5296 then comes PG+BQ with WNr.5323 in Gogh list.
Stammkennzeichen list is a little bit different.
For them, PG+BR/5299 then PG+BS/5300 then PG+BT/5326 ...

Harrison's statement is correct according these two lists.

Cheers, Franck.

[Stig Jarlevik]

Thanks Frank

The 109 is in fact a bit too big type for me to follow so I just quote what has basically been picked up here and there, and that unfortunately did not fit either of your listed sources.

Looks like a lot of red herrings have been floating around in the ponds during long gone days....

Sorry about that...

Cheers
Stig